Discussions: 45,157 | Messages: 608,763 | Members: 29,912 | Online: 365 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1098 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
631 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
944 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Panoramic Cameras and Accessories > Best(!) focal length for 6x12 / 6x17 formats?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-01-2007, 04:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 86
Default Best(!) focal length for 6x12 / 6x17 formats?

I plan to purchase a Shen-Hao TFC45-ⅡB 4x5 view camera with their 6x17 / 6x12 panoramic back.

The lens I'm interested in is a Nikon 135/5.6 Nikkor-W (200mm image circle @ infinity, stopped down to F22) - it's a relatively cheap and small/light lens which gives ~25 degrees vertical, ~54 degrees horizontal and ~58 degrees diagonal angle of view on 6x14 format (same horizontal angle of view with a 35mm lens on 35mm format).

1. Do you think 135mm is a nice choice for formats 6x12 and 6x17?

I'm afraid of lenses as wide as 90mm (as far as I can understand, for some reason this is the most preferred focal length for 6x17) since the horizontal angle of view is quite wide - read as: presumably hard do manage... I also don't want exaggerated perspective effects.

2. What can you say about Shen-Hao's 4x5 camera and panoramic film back?

3. Do you find 135mm a good choice for a single-lens 4x5 LF system?

4. What would be your recommendations for a multi-format >= 6x12 panoramic camera system?

Thanks in advance,
Loris.

Last edited by Loris Medici; 08-01-2007 at 04:30 AM.
Loris Medici is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-01-2007, 04:47 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
David H. Bebbington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,320
Default

Purely a matter of choice - my preference is for 6x12 and 135 mm, with 210 and 360 also used often. My personal feeling is that a combination of 6x17 and 90 mm makes it very hard to get a close-up of anything without falling over yourself or getting your shadow in the picture! I have a Nikon 135/5.6 Nikkor-W, have been very pleased with it.

As regards a recommended system, I would say any regular 4x5" camera with either a 6x12 holder or a step-up back and 6x17 - can't quite see the point of enormously expensive panoramic cameras when any other camera can do the same job!

Regards,

David
David H. Bebbington is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-01-2007, 06:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 4,284
Default

The TFC45-ⅡB is the non-folder right? I bet the number of users is fairly small. The folder is much more common.

I've got a 120mm for 6x12 but like David said it's a personal choice.

I've got the 612BC roll film back. The downside of my model is the very dark ruby window. I just picked up the SPC617 back which fits the 5x7[and bigger] cameras. It's got a more reasonable ruby window. I don't know if that means newer 612BC have similar windows. The intention is to use it on my 5x7 or 8x10 with the reducing back.
Nick Zentena is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-01-2007, 06:13 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
tony lockerbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bega N.S.W. Australia
Posts: 1,388
Default

Just bought a 6x12 Horseman back for my Linhof so I haven't settled on a lens yet but my 135mm Symmar feels pretty right. I have taken a couple on the 90mm and there is no problem here. The good thing about the 6x12 is that the view angle is exactly the same as 5x4, so no adjustment is needed in my shooting style.
Tony
__________________
Visit my webpage
tony lockerbie is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-02-2007, 10:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
nicolai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, US
Posts: 189
Default

There is no "best", just "best for you for a given situation".
nicolai is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 08-02-2007, 11:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Madison, WI and soon to be Syracuse, NY
Posts: 232
Default

I'm in the midwest united states, and tend toward longer lenses here. otherwise there's a lot of sky and foreground. When I went to Yosemite a few years ago, I had to get used to the fact that it was hard to get everything I wanted to in. These are two extremes. Anyway, I think you have to look at your subject matter and the type of landscape you will be shooting in most.
Looking forward to seeing your pics
jamie young is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-02-2007, 11:40 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 4,663
Default

Remember that 6x12 and 6x17 are wide Panoramic formats, a 90mm lens is a very practical option and makes a good standard lens for 6x17.

My personal preference is a 75mm Super Angulon, neither the 90mm or the 75mm give exaggerated perspective on 120 film, either at 6x12 or 6x17. After all 75mm - 90mm lenses are standards on 645/6x6 and 6x7 cameras.

Jamie makes a good point, one of the reasons for shooting 6x17 as opposed to 5x4 is to get everything you want into the image without an excess of foreground and sky.

Ian
Ian Grant is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-05-2007, 12:28 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 547
Default

I have just returned from a 3 day camping/photo trip near The Avenue of the Giants. I used my new pano camera is a Speed Graphic with a 6x12 back the last day. I shot with 65mm Super Angulon and 90mm Fuji and by far my favorite was the 65mm - There are really tall trees there

No problems at all with exaggerated perspective.

Mike
__________________
Web Site at http://home.pacbell.net/mkirwan
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-05-2007, 03:06 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,879
Default

With 6x12 and 6x9 rollfilm backs on my 4x5 Shen Hao my 55mm Rodenstock Apo Grandagon and my 47mm Super Angulon are the lenses I use the most. I also occasionally use my 65mm Super Angulon and I rarely use my 90mm Nikkor.
__________________
Tom Hoskinson
______________________________

Everything is analog - even digital :D
Tom Hoskinson is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-05-2007, 07:32 AM   #10 (permalink)
 
David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 12,552
Default

I think I tend to use the 90mm most often for 6x17, unless I want to shoot handheld with the rangefinder on my Technika, which I can only do with a 150mm lens (it could be done with a 135mm lens, but my 135/3.5 Planar doesn't cover 6x17).

My DaYi 6x17 back doesn't have a red window, but simply an open window with a foam light seal around it and a shutter to keep the window closed when not winding the film, and this hasn't caused any problems.
__________________
Photography-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb/photo
Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb
David A. Goldfarb is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using