Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,723   Posts: 1,515,018   Online: 1238
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    6

    coverage for 7" x 17" camera

    Hello all-

    I am building a 7 x 17 inch camera that I would like to create a zone plate for. There is a zone plate generator on the site Mr. Pinhole, but I do not know what I should enter as the proper focal length. Can anyone suggest a "normal' focal length for this size format? Thanks for any help- Will

  2. #2
    Murray@uptowngallery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Holland, MI
    Shooter
    Pinhole
    Posts
    1,028
    nominally (7^2+17^2)^0.5 (square root of sum of squares of the side dimensions = nominal diagonal...the actual is a miniscule bit shorter, but insignificantly).

    If you have zone plate making capability, great...otherwise go back to f295 and email user POB (Pierre-Olivier) & tell him your project.
    Murray

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,813
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by will kirchoff View Post
    Hello all-

    I am building a 7 x 17 inch camera that I would like to create a zone plate for. There is a zone plate generator on the site Mr. Pinhole, but I do not know what I should enter as the proper focal length. Can anyone suggest a "normal' focal length for this size format? Thanks for any help- Will

    Normal focal length for a 7X17" camera might be in the 450mm - 600mm range. However, many people prefer wide angle lenses for this format, and 305mm is very popular. Bear in mind that with a zone plate you have to be concerned about depth of field, since unlike a pinhole the zone plate lens focuses.

    If I were you I would have the zone plate lens made in the 270mm to 350mm range.

    Sandy

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    111
    Images
    1
    Hey Will,
    don't I know you from Boston?
    Many folks like to use the "normal" lens for the "normal" format on which the pano format is based, which in this case might be the defunct 7"x9" format, which would make between 270mm and 305mm a focal length to look at, or in other words, "what Sandy said"
    Best,
    Tracy
    Tracy Storer
    Polaroid 20x24 Studio West
    www.mammothcamera.com

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, CA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    448
    Images
    19
    [QUOTE=Murray@uptowngallery;553225]nominally (7^2+17^2)^0.5 (square root of sum of squares of the side dimensions = nominal diagonal...the actual is a miniscule bit shorter, but insignificantly).

    QUOTE]

    Nominally I would agree, where the aspect ratio is roughly equivalent to human vision, ie: 1:1.25 or 1:1.5. With a panorama however, it seems to me that the vertical is cut down somewhat and the horizontal is greatly expanded from our usual conception of the visual field. Accordingly, I wonder if Pythagoras should be invoked for a 7x17 to actually consist of an imaginary 7x9, or 8x10, or 9x12 (choose your own) field of view. If you choose 7x9, for instance, you get 11.4 in. or a 290 mm lens. If you choose 9x12 you get 15in. or 380mm.
    Personally, I shoot a 355 when I want "normal" and it looks "normal" to me, but then again, I'm not normal.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin