Couple of quick replies,
Kino- You have no idea, the camera is just one of many issues facing me...
David - hadn't thought about that, have to sleep on that one...
Will - I didn't say that this will be the last camera I build, just a step along the path of photographic nirvana, kind of an initiation into ULF for cheap. And being lith film, it's not like I need to cut it in the dark, hell, I can guillotine a box up at a time, takes about 30 secs. for the time being, I'll have to take your word on the coverage, though surprisingly, I was playing with a 180mm tessar (CJZ) and was shocked that in a pinch, I can nearly illuminate 8x10 (slight vignetting in the corners) with the front element removed, the circle of illumination is huge, though there are gobs of SA and some residual astig, though I'm already thinking there's some Galliesque image potential here....
Argus - ok, right after you send me 50 kilos of chocolates....
Paul, let me know what you end up with, perhaps I can machine some parts up in trade? (as long as there's no threads involved, the old SB9 just doesn't thread well anymore, though I do have a friend that is a machinist that does all my threading for me). I didn't' say conventional film holder, did I. I envision a 1/8" al plate for a septum, with with a grid of .050" or so holes .500" to 1" on center ,connected to a vacuum source through 4-6 o-ringed ports on the back, basically, slide the film holder in, turn vac on, withdraw darkslide, expose, etc.
Donald - hadn't thought about that, though it would make sense, as I'm pretty sure I have at least one lens that cover's unconverted, scads that do converted.
I know the circle of illumination of the componon 360 is huge when converted, though it's a ~800mm f12 lens.
Emile, you do realize that I'm just a poor self employed sign maker, can we trade signwork for life for it?
Jim Fitzgerald and I are both in the middle of building our own 8 x 20's ourselves. Jim's is out of Walnut and mine is out of Makore (african cherry). The one bit if advice I can give is that you really need to take a lot of time planning it all and build model pieces out of cardboard, pine, MDF board, or whatever to test your design. Otherwise, you will go through a lot of your cherry in the process.
If you have the time, woodworking experience, tools, and patience, I'ld recommend it. So far, it has been alot of fun and very satisfying. We've both been posting progress pictures on the Camera Building forum if you want to see our progress.
I did successfully build a quick 8x10 (for under $35.00) so I think that with a meager budget and a few hours here and there, I should be ok.....
That's a deal! I have some connections here.
Originally Posted by epatsellis
(I wish this was not a joke)
I picked up my repro camera (http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI....m=200012842518) last night and the remains of it are still sitting on the trailer awaiting further demolition. I paid $1 for it and probably spent another $40 (mostly trailer hire) getting it home. Fortunately the selllers had a forklift to help load it.
So what did I end up with?
A bellows that has an inside measurement of 270mm x 270mm (11x11") at the small end and 660 x 730 (26" x 28") at the large end. It has about 800mm of draw.
A vacuum pump, two frames and sundry rubber tubing and connectors.
Four 500w halogen lights.
A bank of 4 20W flourescent tubes in a glass topped case.
A large pile of scrap metal.
135/9.5 and 270/9.5 "Repromaster" lenses.
A quick search claims that the lenses were made by/for AGFA and are the same manufacturer as the Staeble and Eskofot range. I've already got a set of Ultragons: 150/9, 240/9 and 305/9 and there are a lot of similarities in construction and finish. The thing is that the 270/9.5 is twice the size of the 305/9 (1154g vs 568g). I guess I'm going to have to wait until I build the camera before I can test the image circle.
The bellows weighs just over 2.5kg (5.5 lb?) and shouldn't be the limiting factor on anything. I can't imagine ever shooting anything that approaches the limits unless 10x28 panoramics get popular. There shouldn't be any need to worry about using it in portrait orientation!
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
Erie, I think the jump to 8x20 would be a good idea. Dan and I are building 8x20's as he said. You have the wood and materials and there is a great deal of help and inspiration on this site. Take your time and do it right. Let us see what you are doing. I've gotten great ideas from the people posting and it has helped me with my first building project.
Originally Posted by epatsellis
Stay Focused....or Soft Focused!!