Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,925   Posts: 1,556,793   Online: 1009
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Michael Finder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Gold Coast, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    149
    Images
    25

    ULF LENS COVERAGE

    I am looking at two lenses for an ULF camera and am unsure of their coverage. Can anyone offer some help please?

    Taylor,Taylor and Hobson 25 inch 635 mm Series IX
    Cooke Apochromatic Process Lens f10 - f128

    Busch Rapid Aplanat No.6
    24 inch f8 - f64
    ROJA vorm. Emil Busch Rathenow

    Thanks in advance.

    Michael Finder

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    229
    Hi,

    For the "Taylor,Taylor and Hobson 25 inch 635 mm Series IX" I am not sure, but the 30 inches version covers 20x30

    have a look at http://www.allenrumme.com/lensdb/DBIntro-1.html they might be listed there,

    cheers

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,455
    If you're lucky the TTH Series IX will cover 45 degrees. If so, it will cover a 21 inch circle.

    Sandholm, a 30 inch lens that covers 20 x 30 inches at infinity covers 62 degrees. Few ancient process lenses have that much coverage. Process lenses coverage is conventionally given for 1:1, not infinity. This has confused many innocents.

  4. #4
    jp80874's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bath, OH 44210 USA
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,436
    Images
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by sandholm View Post
    ....have a look at http://www.allenrumme.com/lensdb/DBIntro-1.html they might be listed there,

    cheers
    What a GOLD MINE!
    Thank you!

    John Powers

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    229
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Fromm View Post
    If you're lucky the TTH Series IX will cover 45 degrees. If so, it will cover a 21 inch circle.

    Sandholm, a 30 inch lens that covers 20 x 30 inches at infinity covers 62 degrees. Few ancient process lenses have that much coverage. Process lenses coverage is conventionally given for 1:1, not infinity. This has confused many innocents.
    Well, its not me its the http://www.allenrumme.com/lensdb/DBIntro-1.html and the 12 lenses I have are correct listed in the database.

    If you doubt, check which source he got it from and ask them.

    cheers

  6. #6
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,281
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,455
    Quote Originally Posted by sandholm View Post
    Well, its not me its the http://www.allenrumme.com/lensdb/DBIntro-1.html and the 12 lenses I have are correct listed in the database.

    If you doubt, check which source he got it from and ask them.

    cheers
    I checked. You misread the table. He does indeed report that the 30" TTH Series IX covers 20 x 30, but at 1:1. At infinity it covers 15x20, i.e., 45 degrees.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    New Mexico
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    98
    It is nice to see that the database is actually useful on occasion, as I get little indication other than the monthly web site statistics. I have a boat load more data that needs to be added to the tables and a large stack of catalogs, and advertisements that need to be reviewed. It would be great to make this a searchable database at some point, rather than just a big list. But all of that takes time, of which I never seem to have enough.

    I think a couple of comments on the data are also in order. All the data comes from manufacturer's catalogs, advertisements, or brochures. If it didn't come directly from a manufacturer generated source, that I have in my possession, it isn't included. All the sources are listed so that folks can go check the primary sources if they so choose. There are duplicate entries for some lenses because in comparing data on the same lens, from two different sources, I found different specifications. Lastly, I only report the data the manufacturer provides, if they only list coverage at infinity, then the other coverage columns are left blank. I have attempted to make the data as accurate as possible, but my dyslexic fingers sometimes have a mind of their own. If errors exist then let me know so I can remedy the problem.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,455
    Hmm. Live by the catalog, die by the catalog.

    I make this point because I recently had the opportunity to confront what two Berthiot catalogs (pre-WWI, between the wars) and one Berthiot brochure (post-WWII) say about Perigraphes' (Serie VIa, f/14; Serie VIb, f/6.8) coverage. It fell over time. In the case of the VIb, from 95 degrees to 65 degrees.

    Further on this point my friend and co-author Eric Beltrando (see his site, www.dioptrique.info) has used a ray-tracing program he wrote to evaluate a number of lenses' performance, including coverage, using prescriptions from patents and from as much of the Boyer archives as he has. Short answer, in general coverage claims are exaggerated. This is especially the case with Boyer's Beryl, a clone of Goertz' Dagor, and the Dagor itself.

    Faith in coverage claims published in catalogs seems, um, misplaced. The best way to know what a lens will do for you is to ask it.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    New Mexico
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Fromm View Post
    Hmm. Live by the catalog, die by the catalog.

    Faith in coverage claims published in catalogs seems, um, misplaced. The best way to know what a lens will do for you is to ask it.
    Catalog data is most certainly only a starting point, and one must verify for themselves if a specific lens meets their needs. You imply, however, that catalog data is completely useless, which it isn't, and your condescending tone is far from necessary. Some finite starting point is a much better place to begin ones investigations. The reason I started this database was that there is a huge amount of anecdotal information floating around out there that is, in my experience, worthless.

    I am quite familiar with Eric's efforts, having corresponded and shared some data with him.
    Last edited by AllenR; 04-18-2011 at 12:12 PM. Click to view previous post history.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin