Discussions: 45,207 | Messages: 609,544 | Members: 29,948 | Online: 188 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1137 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
648 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
963 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Plate Cameras and Accessories > Best 9x12 folding plate camera to start

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2008, 07:28 AM   #51 (permalink)
 
Steve Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ryde, Isle of Wight, England
Posts: 2,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gandolfi
Today I just got a Bergheil 9x12 in a beautiful condition!!

I have just done a bit of a search on Bergheil and unless I am mistaken, I think I have one.

I certainly have a similar camera with the spring loaded lens release mechanism. Mine didn't come with a lens or its associated mounting plate but I'm sure the catch on the body is the same. Can you post a close up of this area so I can compare them?



Steve.
Steve Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-25-2008, 03:12 AM   #52 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 4,693
Default

Steve, there were about 30 different manufacturers producing very similar looking cameras, mainly in Germany, up until the end of the 1930's. Some of them use common parts, or possibly copied parts.

It would be better to post some images of your camera.

Ian
__________________
My APUG portfolio
Ian Grant is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-25-2008, 03:30 AM   #53 (permalink)
 
Steve Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ryde, Isle of Wight, England
Posts: 2,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
Steve, there were about 30 different manufacturers producing very similar looking cameras, mainly in Germany, up until the end of the 1930's. Some of them use common parts, or possibly copied parts.
You are right. I have two or three of these but only one has the catch for a quick release lens plate.

I forgot to look at it last night though.

I was going to make a plate to permanently fit to the front but if there is a possibility of making a plate which works with this catch, I might give it a go (after I finished the hundreds of other things I have started or thought about doing!).




Steve.
Steve Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-25-2008, 04:44 AM   #54 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 4,693
Default

Steve, I have noticed at least two UK sellers on ebay who quite obviously strip the lenses off 9x12cm cameras and sell them separately, a good the lens on it's own sells for far more than a complete 9x12 camera, in the UK.

Somewhere I have an image of a non-Voightlander 9x12 which took interchangeable lenses, with a bayonet mount. My guess though is if yours is a Bergheil someone sold the original lens for 5x4 use. My Rodenstock camera with an excellent Eurynar cost me around £30, currently 2 Eurynars are on Ebay for £120 +£125.

Ian
__________________
My APUG portfolio
Ian Grant is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-25-2008, 04:54 AM   #55 (permalink)
 
Steve Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ryde, Isle of Wight, England
Posts: 2,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
My guess though is if yours is a Bergheil someone sold the original lens for 5x4 use.
That would be my guess too even if it isn't a Bergheil as I bought it without a lens.

I had planned to make it into a simple, lightweight 5x4 camera with a basic film holder and use a modified film holder with a ground glass for focussing but as I have a few holders which fit it and it's original ground glass viewer, I may keep it as it is.

I did buy another, similar camera without the lens mount which was not in good condition. I bought it for the lens, a Zeiss 135mm Tessar, to use on my home made 5x4. Despite reports to the contrary, it does cover 5x4 with limited movements. This lens could be put back to use on a 9x12cm camera.

Another interesting thing I found was that all of my 9x12cm film (glass plate actually) holders were fitted with supplementary holders to take 2" x 3" plates.


Steve.
Steve Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 09-25-2008, 05:07 AM   #56 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 4,693
Default

The 135mm f4.5 Tessar was very common on 9x12 cameras usually on the top of the range models, only really Voightlander and other camera/lens manufacturers like Rodenstock & Goerz didn't use thems. They were also often fitted on 5x4 Speed/Crown Graphics, they do cover 5x4 but edge/corner sharpness is poor until f16 and best at f22.

Ian
__________________
My APUG portfolio
Ian Grant is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-27-2008, 10:21 AM   #57 (permalink)
 
gandolfi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 961
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Smith View Post
I have just done a bit of a search on Bergheil and unless I am mistaken, I think I have one.

I certainly have a similar camera with the spring loaded lens release mechanism. Mine didn't come with a lens or its associated mounting plate but I'm sure the catch on the body is the same. Can you post a close up of this area so I can compare them?



Steve.
hi steve.
here are two images for you.
the first is the frontplate of the Bergheil. The second, the back of the lens..

Hope that was what you was asking about. (?)

emil
Attached Images
File Type: jpg bergheil-fatning-01.jpg (43.9 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg bergheil-fatning-02.jpg (65.1 KB, 13 views)
gandolfi is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-28-2008, 08:51 AM   #58 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 711
Default

Zeiss Ideal, Favorit, Juwel and others all had removeable lenses but a photograph of the camera would easily identify it. The Zeiss lenses have two bayonet ears extending outside the shutter housing, the Bergheil uses a flange behind the shutter.
Mark
__________________
Mark Layne
Nova Scotia
and Barbados
Mark Layne is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-29-2008, 06:02 PM   #59 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa. USA
Posts: 529
Default

I have a Zeiss Ikon Miroflex, which is a fairly amazing camera:

Reflex viewing, a focal plane cloth shutter with speeds to 1/2000 and an interchangeable lens (with some effort). The standard lens is a 15cm Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar.

Of course, the challenge is to find one that doesn't need new curtains, is working on all speeds and has a ground glass screen and focusing hood intact.

Otherwise, great camera.
__________________
Mike Elek
my site »
elekm is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 11-20-2008, 08:13 AM   #60 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Naestved, DK
Posts: 1,867
Default

Hmm Did I post this link to a site on some Voigtländer plate and roll filmcameras
http://www.cinci.de/index.html

kind regards
__________________
Søren Nielsen
Denmark

Ok no more cameras until July 2009
Soeren is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using