Discussions: 45,149 | Messages: 608,659 | Members: 29,909 | Online: 197 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1096 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
629 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
942 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Darkroom > Silver Gelatin Based Emulsion Making & Coating > 16mm handmade emulsion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2007, 03:25 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 75
Default 16mm handmade emulsion

I have finally got a tough gelatin capable of traveling through my 16mm camera. Unfortunately, as a bad experimenter, I tried the pre-hardening before the gelatin was dried and it destroyed most of the emulsion. The other batch I have that is better coated i actually used a paint brush to do so. Anyway, here are some scanned samples (with a flatbed scanner):

http://jcsmr.anu.edu.au/~rleao/DH_pics/Film_stripe1.jpg

http://jcsmr.anu.edu.au/~rleao/DH_pics/Film_stripe2.jpg

http://jcsmr.anu.edu.au/~rleao/DH_pics/Film_stripe3.jpg

Now, with my other batch, I'll try to develop as reversal and then project it, then it comes another problem, while the emulsion survived the camera, I ain't sure if it would survive a 16mm projector, so, my question is, what could I use to toughen it to peel off? Could I spray lacquer or something like it after the development? What do you guys think? Many thanks.

richardson
narigas2006 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-26-2007, 08:12 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 12,551
Default

Wow. It's obviously really funky, but it would also look really cool projected, if you can get enough contrast to make it look good on screen.
__________________
Photography-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb/photo
Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb
David A. Goldfarb is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-26-2007, 12:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,734
Default

In the first sample, Kodak edge markings are clearly visible. This indicates that there is some of the original emulsion present in a form viable enough to image this edge mark. Could this be contributing to some of the image? To some of the problems? IDK, but it should not be there.

You should add hardener just prior to coating the emulsion. You can add a humectant such as sorbitol. Many films are lacquered after processing to protect them. Kodachrome is one of those films.

PE
Photo Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-26-2007, 01:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Van Buren, Arkansas
Posts: 1,830
Default

Could it be that he is contact printing a 16mm negative? onto his homemade emulsion?
PHOTOTONE is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-26-2007, 02:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,734
Default

It says "survived a camera" so I assume it did. IDK, and that is why I ask. If emulsion remained behind from the previous film, it would certainly mess up the experiment in one way or another.

PE
Photo Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 02-26-2007, 04:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
htmlguru4242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Worcester, MA, Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 889
Default

Quite interesting. I agree with David that it looks a little funky, but PE has a good point about the previous emulsion being still on the base. Definitely keep this up though and let us know how it goes!.

I wonder if you could find raw 16mm clear base to coat onto ...
htmlguru4242 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-26-2007, 06:07 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
Jerevan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 709
Default

Cool project! I wonder if http://www.filmotec.de/ could sell clear 16 mm base?
__________________
Photography reveals truths that reality obscures.
Jerevan is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-26-2007, 07:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
It says "survived a camera" so I assume it did. IDK, and that is why I ask. If emulsion remained behind from the previous film, it would certainly mess up the experiment in one way or another.

PE
Hi PE,

I should have explained, the kodak label is printed in the leader (I used clear polyester leader from kodak, not old film, so no remaining emulsion). The leader is black also because I inverted the scanned images in Gimp (they were actually negatives). I used sorbitol in the original formula. I'll try the lacquer before projecting it. Many thanks!
narigas2006 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-26-2007, 07:16 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,734
Default

Best of luck to you.

Any estimate of the speed?

PE
Photo Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-26-2007, 07:44 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
Best of luck to you.

Any estimate of the speed?

PE
Thanks! I did some diffuse measurements (it was overcast) and using 16fps (1/30) and f4 i'd say ~15.

And Jerevan, thanks for the tip! I just found out that they have precoated acetate clear leader!
narigas2006 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using