Discussions: 45,207 | Messages: 609,544 | Members: 29,948 | Online: 194 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1137 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
648 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
963 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Darkroom > Silver Gelatin Based Emulsion Making & Coating > How color film actually looks

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-28-2007, 06:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,747
Default How color film actually looks

Here are photo micrographs of actual color films.

One compares film to a human hair, and the other shows film before and after processing.

In the before and after process photos, you can see the silver grains in one and not in the other, and you can also see the change in the layers.

Again, I am indebted to my friend, Dr. Bruce Kahn for permission to use these photos.

You can see from the size of the hair in comparison to the thickness of the film layers why I have likened photo engineering to designing a biological system, as we are working on the scale of cellular structures or smaller, when we build and examine film.

PE
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cross section and hair.jpg (129.2 KB, 171 views)
File Type: jpg cross section.jpg (195.5 KB, 177 views)
Photo Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-28-2007, 09:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
JBrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 3,994
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Thanks PE,


Those are a 10 on my neatstuffometer.
__________________
--J Brunner, The Prints of Darkness


Developing video:
http://www.jasonbrunner.com/videos.html
JBrunner is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-28-2007, 10:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
jstraw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Posts: 2,561
Default

So the yellow layer...before processing it looks quite diffreren than the magenta or cyan...yes?
__________________
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. In velit arcu, consequat at, interdum sit amet, consequat in, quam.

http://mnewmanphoto.com
jstraw is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 02-28-2007, 10:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
richard ide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa Ontario
Posts: 488
Default

PE
I was told many years ago (I think by my Kodak rep.)That your colour films are coated wet on wet with as many as 20 layers. Does that seem right? technically, what an amazing challenge to produce. I worked for a diazo coater many years ago so have a slight clue.
__________________
Richard

Why are there no speaker jacks on a stereo camera?
richard ide is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-01-2007, 12:57 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Montréal (QC)
Posts: 3,647
Default

Does the "before processing" means "after silver development, but before color developer," given the visible grains?
__________________
Using film since before it was hip.
Michel Hardy-Vallée is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 03-01-2007, 01:38 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
Steve Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ryde, Isle of Wight, England
Posts: 2,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBrunner View Post
Those are a 10 on my neatstuffometer.
That would be a coolness factor of 1000 milliFonzies!

Steve.
Steve Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-01-2007, 04:02 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
ben-s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 410
Default

This is fascinating stuff!
I've looked at film under my microscope, and the grain structure is fascinating.
I'll have to try a bit on edge, and see if I can see the layers.
Any idea what mag these are at?

Anyone got a spare microtome?
__________________
Lens caps and cable releases can become invisible at will. :D
ben-s is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-01-2007, 12:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,747
Default

In answer to the questions above, the yellow layer is usually the coarsest grained, fastest of all emulsions, and yes, Kodak coats up to 20 or so layers at one time in a single pass. I believe that my max was 14 or so.

You have to remember that this is also at very high speed, probably 3x faster than most of the industry standards, and orders of magnitude faster than many 3rd tier companies.

PE
Photo Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-01-2007, 12:09 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
jstraw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Posts: 2,561
Default

I'm not sure what the correct metric is....feet per second? How fast can those lines run?
__________________
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. In velit arcu, consequat at, interdum sit amet, consequat in, quam.

http://mnewmanphoto.com
jstraw is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-01-2007, 12:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,747
Default

Sorry, I would rather not discuss actual figures on the speed.

PE
Photo Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using