Discussions: 45,150 | Messages: 608,663 | Members: 29,909 | Online: 198 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1096 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
629 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
942 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Darkroom > Silver Gelatin Based Emulsion Making & Coating > To Photo Engineer

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2007, 05:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 97
Default To Photo Engineer

Dear sir

Last night I made a batch of unwashed emulsion and shot a number of plates today, It worked out better than I expected with better contrast, density and speed compaired to what I have been using. The main thing is that the emulsion after development exhibits a surface texture similar to that of hypo chrystals as when fixer is left out and dried in the tray,as small small linear surface lines, but does not seem to cause any problems other wise other than a tendancy to lift from the plate some times.

The stuff is thicker than the other emulsion I have been using and coats better, sort of like a double cadmium collodion. Would less gelatin or more water result in a smooth consistent surface with out sacrificing the image quality?

Inert gelatin was used with sensitiser, accidentaly used twice as much as shuld have been used. Could a new batch be made and intermixed with this one, or should it be washed? What effect will washing have?

Also,is the addition of potasium bromide as a final for stabeliser a good idea for this emulsion?

I do'nt mean to sound whiney but this is one of those things where simpler might be better.

Thanks
KPK
kevin klein is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-03-2007, 05:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,734
Default

The effect you describe is typical of unhardened emulsion or hardened emulsion that is not left to dry long enough. What you describe is severe reticulation.

It could also be due to the lack of adhesion to the support. This would be the case of an unwashed emulsion on glass or film, or emulsion coated on a poorly subbed film.

As a final stabilzer to a washed emulsion, potassium bromide is a good stabilizer, but the Tetra Aza Indene I describe elsewhere, and which is in Jim Browning's article is even better. I'm trying to arrange to have it made available as a solution from a distributor as it is tricky to make up.

The final coated gelatin should be between 5 and 12% with the best being around 8 - 10%.

You cannot easily mix a sulfur sensitized emulsion with one that is unsensitzed, but you can mix a spectrally sensitized emulsion with one that is not spectrally sensitzed and sometimes get good results.

Adding too much sulfur increases fog, adding too much sensitizing dye will decrease speed and contrast.

Emulsion making is not easy, but once you learn it, it becomes easier and easier with each repeat performance.

All the best to you.

PE
Photo Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-03-2007, 06:04 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Neanderman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ohio River Valley
Posts: 303
Default

Could you please give this some context? Percentage of what?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post

The final coated gelatin should be between 5 and 12% with the best being around 8 - 10%.

PE
Ed
Neanderman is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-03-2007, 07:04 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,734
Default

Gelatin in water. That is, for 10%, 10 grams of gelatin in 100 grams of total emulsion. The gelatin is 250 BI photo grade, bone gelatin.

Pe
Photo Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-04-2007, 06:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 97
Default

Thanks for the info. I did wash the emulsion and it is behaving much better.
The speed and density are much better than what I have been using.

As far as I am concerned this simpler bromide emulsion is the thing to use, I am very pleased, good density for albumen printing.
kevin klein is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 03-04-2007, 06:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,734
Default

You said it was one I posted earlier.

Was this the Ammonia emulsion?

PE
Photo Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using