Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,011   Posts: 1,524,665   Online: 812
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21
    dwross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Oregon Coast
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    798
    Ron:

    I'm delighted that you have a sample of matte commercial baryta. I'd love to look at it. Could you hang on to it for awhile? I've got paper samples piled so high and deep here that it would just get lost, and also I know you're busy packing up for Montana.

    I'm going to try my hand at making baryta paper. I know that the glossy is beyond me. Apparently, it takes many passes through a calendering machine to produce a high gloss, but I should be able to manage a matte-type. (Now, that statement may just be the ultimate in hubris.) I finally got the barium sulfate. "Barytes" used to be available through Daniel Smith Art Supplies, along with things like China Clay for printmaking. For some reason, it's gotten hard to get. I found it from a chemical supply house in Florida. It took my business license and a statement of intent, but after that it didn't even ship HazMat. Go figure. I'll keep you informed. Hopefully, the Great Baryta Grail will go better than my Flubber Adventure!

    d

  2. #22
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,942
    Images
    65
    Denise;

    You can use 60% medical barium sulfate paste for this operation. (pun intended) If you don't have pre-prepared paste, you may need to use a ball mill to get the material down to the right particle size for coating.

    Mixing it with gelatin to get the right thickness, adding surfactant and hardener and coating will give you a matte 'rough' finish baryta which looks very interesting. It should be fun.

    You may need to coat this with a blade at 10 mil instead of 5 or 7. In fact, you may need to go to 20 mil for proper coverage. It depends on the viscosity and coverage of the material.

    PE

  3. #23
    dwross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Oregon Coast
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    798
    Hi All:

    I have just posted the current update of my emulsion research. The material relating specifically to puddle pushers is here:

    http://dwrphotos.com/blog/Section7/Papers.htm

    Hope it helps. Happy Emulsion Making.
    Denise

  4. #24
    Alex Hawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,895
    Images
    63
    Fascinating Denise, and a most well-done presentation. Thank you for making this info available.
    Semper Fi & God Bless America
    My Photography Blog

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    127
    Denise,

    I agree with Alex, great presentation and content.

    I concur with the sentiments of the "I love Emulsion" page. I'm sure this forum will enable a whole new batch of amateur emulsion making to occur. I look forward to your Jan 2008 update.

    Thanks for sharing all this wonderful information!

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Hawley View Post
    Fascinating Denise, and a most well-done presentation. Thank you for making this info available.

  6. #26
    donbga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Shooter
    Large Format Pan
    Posts
    2,058
    Quote Originally Posted by dwross View Post
    Hi All:

    I have just posted the current update of my emulsion research. The material relating specifically to puddle pushers is here:

    http://dwrphotos.com/blog/Section7/Papers.htm

    Hope it helps. Happy Emulsion Making.
    Denise
    Nice write up Denise. The Defender formula seems very similar to the Ansco 130 formula.

    Thanks,
    Don Bryant

  7. #27
    dwross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Oregon Coast
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    798
    Hi All:

    Many thanks for the kind and supportive thoughts. They are appreciated. I'm ruefully aware I can get a little evangelical about emulsion making. I keep hoping to hear that someone else has joined the club. But it may be that the APUG group is a tad too conservative. B&W paper is seen as something that comes in a package from a factory. The way it always has been is the way it oughta be (I really am saying that with smile on my face. I respect the intent of APUG's mission.)

    Because I do respect it, and sincerely respect Sean's right to keep out digital, I am very uncomfortable posting anything here. APUG should be the natural place for this dialogue. But, because I am incorporating digital negatives (scanned from film) into my research and work flow, I should not be posting here and will not again.

    I will continue posting updates and answering any questions I can about silver gelatin emulsions on hybridphoto.com. If you haven't visited the site, you really should. I'm pretty sure it's not a sin. Great folks there with a genuine love of photography - past, present, and future.

    http://hybridphoto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=386

    Best wishes to all,
    Denise

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin