Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,205   Posts: 1,531,766   Online: 974
      
Page 1 of 9 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 82
  1. #1
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,796
    Images
    108

    Solving Polaroid PN 55 Secret

    Ron , As you remember , I had been started a thread on polaroid emulsion making here.
    Finally , you said , kodak had been secretly developed the emulsion recipes.
    50 years ago , there was not todays spectrometers and I believe PN 55 developer and thin film formulas can be reverse engineered.
    I worked 22 years on zildjian and published the secret at www.cymbalholic.com under zildjian secret thread.
    Some people visited me from France and started to cymbal business at there with my recipe.
    I think I can again make it for PN 55.
    Ron , you know the technology , how can this film and developer be analysed ?
    I read some whiskey manufacturers at Scotland started to spectrum analysis their alcohol to match all future production to a single formula.
    Liquids ...
    I did not use PN 55 but I saw some nude pictures taken by rodenstock land at polaroid com gallery and they were the best bw pictures i have ever seen.
    How Kodak test their films chemical contents ?
    Is there a special method ? Can Kodak be hired to analyse the films as Land hired the Kodak ?
    Or are there same instruments at USA elsewhere cheaper ? University labs ?
    Nowadays dollar is so low and its time to import knowledge from USA .
    I think England and Europe costs 3 times more !
    Can Russian technology be hired ? Is there anyone knows Russia ? David may be ?
    Ron , you know the patents of Land , Can you collect recipes here belong to PN 55 ? If I know some portion of the mix , it would be easier to extract unknown.
    I read Davids monobath experiments. Is Polaroid monobath formula inside of little pockets which opened and spreaded with rolls.
    I think I will start from there , is there a polaroid monobath patent just for PN 55 ?
    Is there still factory fresh PN 55 at the market ?

    Best ,

    Mustafa Umut Sarac

    Istanbul

  2. #2
    Alex Hawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,895
    Images
    63
    Hi Mustafa,

    I can't speak for Ron, nor do I have any of his wizardy in my brain, but perhaps I can offer a couple things to the discussion. I've used several boxes of Type 55 so I have some familiarity with it.

    You're right. It is/was an absolutely excellent film. I've said many times that I could have been happy just using Type 55 for everything.

    One problem I see with reverse engineering it is with the film base material. The stuff that was used was pretty unique. It was a lot thinner yet stronger than conventional film bases. To my meager knowledge, Type 55/665 and Kodak Panatomic X were the only commercial films that used this base material. All of those films are out of commercial production so I would suspect that the base material is nearly impossible to find. Could it be reverse-engineered? I'm sure it could, but producing it would take a full-scale plastic/chemical sheet production facility.

    The second problem I see is one that Ron has wrote about before. The most difficult thing to manufacture on the instant films was the chemical pod. Not that the chemistry was hard, it was the pod itself that was very difficult to do.

    My suggestion is to experiment with monobath developers. David Goldfarb has been writing about them lately. No chemical pods required.

    You may be able to still find some retailers with a small stock of Type 55. Be prepared to spend at least $100 per box for it. I checked Polaroid's web store and they are no longer listing it.

    Type 55 and 665 were stunning films. Its a shame they are gone but that's the unfortunate reality.
    Semper Fi & God Bless America
    My Photography Blog

  3. #3
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,796
    Images
    108
    There are hundreds of companies at china and india which seeks customer like crazy. They can manufacture the base and the pods. At Intota site , there are many experts who are ready for help.
    But it coasts 500 dollars per hour but they have 40 years of experience.
    I think pod is the easiest thing to do but I want the image quality , we dont need to imitate the pod. May be customer distribute the monobath at home . It would be decrease the manufacturing cost also. We are not running after instant photography but the quality.
    Market is 4 x 5 . I think after the chemical analyses , Ron can change the formula with cheaper newer chemicals without altering the result.
    I am after writing a manual of inside chemicals.
    I need patent numbers exactly for PN 55. And a analyser company , may be Kodak Labs.
    Ron , can you reach inside of labs today with your connections ?

  4. #4
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,796
    Images
    108
    2686717
    2483390
    2698245
    2558856
    2563342
    2558856
    2706937
    2565376
    2584029
    2455126
    2661292
    2689306
    2708864
    2702146
    2653527
    2692830
    2544260
    2435717
    2584030
    2496630
    2726154
    2662822
    2558857
    2559643
    2719791
    2627460
    2435719
    2500422
    2590186
    2698798
    2635048
    2565378
    2435718
    2740714
    2616805
    2704721
    2698243
    2572357
    2669516
    2647056
    I found 46-52 patents from land

  5. #5
    Murray@uptowngallery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Holland, MI
    Shooter
    Pinhole
    Posts
    1,028
    Somewhere I read the paste had triethanolamine in it.

    But that's about as helpful as saying D-76 has water in in after it's mixed.
    Murray

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by Murray@uptowngallery View Post
    But that's about as helpful as saying D-76 has water in in after it's mixed.
    so that's what i've been doing wrong

  7. #7
    Jim Noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,828
    Blog Entries
    1
    If I remember correctly, originally the film used was Panatomic X.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Films NOT Dead - Just getting fixed![/FONT]

  8. #8
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,079
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    Mustafa, I don't think there is any problem figuring out what's in the pods... certainly, we can break open a pod and do spectroscopy and tell you exactly what's in there and in what proportion. We probably already can guess the most important ingredients based on others' monobath work.

    Even deciding which film best approximates what was used may not be such a challenge- there are so many rumours about it being panatomic x that we could just say, fine, close enough, let's call it that. No need for me to throw it on a TEM or whatever and prove it so.

    But then what?

    The issue is the reliable production of the packed and podded film with QC at the level of Polaroid... or better yet, the level of Kodak or Fuji. Based on what reading I've done, I would conclude that getting the polaroids to shelf at reasonable cost, in mass quantities, and with acceptable shelf life and QC is by far the hardest part. The formulas have been known for a very long time by two, maybe three companies.

    What disappoints me is that polaroid has yet to step up and say, fine, we hereby discontinue the film as a packed product, but we will release the emulsion formula and the goo recipe... I mean, formulary could probably make up a goo and sell it in nothing flat, for use with a variety of films and processable by relatively simple rolling mechanisms. It disappoints me that polaroid didn't see that the true value of the product is definitely not in the positive image- it is in the quickly developable neg. For this they will face the wrath of St. Ansel himself on Judgement Day. And Ansel's gonna be pissed. I think he's going to place them on zone 20 or so.
    Last edited by keithwms; 05-11-2008 at 12:20 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  9. #9
    Murray@uptowngallery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Holland, MI
    Shooter
    Pinhole
    Posts
    1,028
    If the goal is to make a film that acts like 55, NOT necessarily to make an INSTANT film that acts like 55 (and the prints themselves are not what makes it so great), one needs to keep perspective.

    Do people who use and love 55 think that there is really nothing that can provide comparable results? Have the other film companies really never matched or exceeded 55's capability?

    "What is the best...?" questions pop up here daily. There is no such best ANYTHING in subjective interpretation.

    I don't think a patent or even a list of ingredients makes something manufacturable (we would be lacking the specific processes), and what incentive do people who work 9-5 have, to research this to assist film lovers on the Internet? I don't see how the time and resources can be procured for the research on a charity basis. As Mustafa noted, people ARE available for hire, but who is going to cough up the money?

    Then, how close is "close enough" in reverse chemical engineering? There are generic pharmaceuticals and cosmetic products that mimic 'name brands'. Some are functionally equivalent (speaks highly for the reverse engineering), but many have slightly different minor differences like odor, texture etc. (I'm speaking more about non-medicinal product copying).

    If the goal is to make the film only, for home development, I really have to wonder whether people shooting film in formats other than 4x5 and 8x10 suffer the indignity of feeling the film they use will never be as good as Polaroid 55.

    This sounds like more effort than even getting Polaroid to start making it again. At least that has a yes or no result that isn't subjective.
    Murray

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Eastern, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,020
    Images
    55
    g'day all

    so the experts who made and marketed these products could not find a viable consumer base, why should any other manufacturer even bother?

    maybe it's time you all got over your attachments to various materials, good photography is not about what you use, it's about how you see

    Ray

Page 1 of 9 1234567 ... LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin