|
|
|
-
PE,
You rock! I, for one, seriously appreciate your effort.
-
 Originally Posted by alexhill
PE,
You rock! I, for one, seriously appreciate your effort.
Thanks.
I do the best I can, but sometimes it is hard as you get older.
I hope I can meet all of my aims in the book.
Best wishes to all.
PE
-
 Originally Posted by Photo Engineer
Graham;
Thanks. Sometimes it feels like I am back at work and I'm my boss. I don't like me telling me what to do!
OTOH, I do have to kick myself to get started as this is difficult work and getting harder and harder. In addition, no one seems interested in it around here at all. We used to have parties for RIT students here and visitors all the time, but now all I hear is "you are on your own". Analog is not a current interest in these parts. When most of us retire or leave EK, they abandon photography completely or go to digital.
PE
I always thought about building a massive EMP device, but this would kill my precious internet, and I would no longer be able to watch my foreign shows.
-
-
Miller;
I was half joking, but if I could get 100 or so 4x5 contact prints with good coating quality of one single negative with a reference print set at the same density and gradation on a brand name paper of any sort (but identified), this would go into the book with pleasure along with an acknowledgment of your work and the students names along with you and the school. After all, credit where credit is due! Including a Stouffer step wedge in the image area would be a big benefit as well. I do this with a 6x7 negative and a small size Stouffer wedge.
Each of the premium sets would then contain two prints (reference and experiment) along with the DVD set. If you go ahead, please insure that you know what contrast grade you get from the Formulary and check beforehand. I think that they are almost out of the current supply and may only have one grade in stock. IDK when the next run is scheduled.
Thanks.
PE
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
I saw that Formulary had both a low contrast and a regular batch – is there one that would make the most sense?
Would you supply me with a specific negative, or do I use one of my own (which is not a problem).
I have step tablets from both stouffer and those big yellow guys too.
Just to be clear, the experiment print would be the one using formulary's solution and the reference print would use a commercial paper?
-
 Originally Posted by J. Miller Adam
I saw that Formulary had both a low contrast and a regular batch – is there one that would make the most sense?
Would you supply me with a specific negative, or do I use one of my own (which is not a problem).
I have step tablets from both stouffer and those big yellow guys too.
Just to be clear, the experiment print would be the one using formulary's solution and the reference print would use a commercial paper?
Miller;
One would be a Formazo print and the other would be a standard print, both run through the same developer with one of your negatives and a step wedge. So, there would be 2 prints.
The Formazo comes in Soft and Hard (about 2 and 3 grade with Azo speed).
The choice of negative would depend on which batch they have left. If they only have the Soft, then you would need a harder negative, etc....
Does this make sense to you?
PE
|
|