Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,299   Posts: 1,535,775   Online: 761
      
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31
  1. #21
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,821
    Images
    108
    And did you notice that autochrome histograms are smoother ?

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustafa Umut Sarac View Post
    QC , Lets continiue to reverse engineering. May be We can post process an image as you told and see the result. This is called histogram matching or something similar to it .
    Is there anyone who knows how to create such a histogram on a image or do I need to ask to hybrid photo ? This is not digital photography but get help from a calculator.
    You could produce such an image easily (in theory) in any image processing software. Just fill an image with a gradual transition from black to white.
    You have to make sure that the image is as many pixels wide as there are tone steps in the colour mode (or a whole number multiple of that), so that each tone does indeed find a place.

    In theory, because you need to be able to control the gradient fill tool so that it does indeed use the same step size for every part of the tone scale (gamma 1?).

    In such an image, every tone is present as often as any other tone: flat histogram.

    But recreating such an image would indeed be something for hybridphoto.


    Oh, and no: i haven't noticed any extraordinary smoothness in the histograms of the Autochrome images i have picked of the web and tried.

  3. #23
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,821
    Images
    108
    Can you select a image and convert it to flat histogram as you told ?
    By this way people do not have to imagine but see .
    If you want , you can carry it to hybridphoto but it is not a crowded environment but harder to find help !
    By this way , may be you will want to discuss to create a flat histogram by analog meanings !

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    That would be a lot of work. And i mean a lot of work. So, no.

    You can create a flat histogram using film by taking a picture of a continous wedge, and trace that with a densitometer.
    Whether it will be really flat depends on exposure and processing though. To help, no toe or shoulder is allowed. The curve itself must not be a curve, but be straight. And gamma must be 1.

  5. #25
    lxdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Redlands, So. Calif.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,628
    Quote Originally Posted by 2F/2F View Post
    What is a "histogram"? I am sure someone at Hybrid Photo dot com knows!
    They give you allergies this time of year. That's why people take anti-histograms.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    3,268
    Doesn't a "flat histogram" indicate that there is not a lot of color saturation in the image?
    Kirk

    For up from the ashes, up from the ashes, grow the roses of success!

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Keyes View Post
    Doesn't a "flat histogram" indicate that there is not a lot of color saturation in the image?
    I don't think so.

  8. #28
    Athiril's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,499
    Images
    28
    flat histograms to me respresent a lot of colour separation and high saturation (usually), not something I think of when thinking of Autochrome.

    For example, here is the histogram of some Kodak 50D that has very very little colour information, due to the telecine operator setting the white point to the negative density of when the camera was running at only a few frames per second and thus several stops overexposed instead of the maximum density of when it was running at 25 fps - he also compressed it out to 1997 HDCAM without the correct levels set, which was then recompressed out to ProRes,

    Long story short, what we end up with is a piece of crap with 5.27 bits of information on average per colour channel.



    Now if we compare that to something with reasonable colour separation and saturation
    Last edited by Athiril; 05-01-2010 at 11:00 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  9. #29
    nick mulder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,204
    Images
    14
    This reminds me of the time I put a photoshop standard gradient (the default option) from black to white vertically or horizontally across a large enough resolution file then looked at the histogram...

    certainly not linear ! although I suspect the issue was with the gradient tool, rather than the histogram - although I do wonder ...
    Cleared the bowel problem, working on the consonants...

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by nick mulder View Post
    This reminds me of the time I put a photoshop standard gradient (the default option) from black to white vertically or horizontally across a large enough resolution file then looked at the histogram...

    certainly not linear ! although I suspect the issue was with the gradient tool, rather than the histogram - although I do wonder ...
    That has to do with what i wrote before, i think.
    A histogram is nothing but a list of all possible tones, with information about how often each of those is found in an image.

    So a gradient from black to white should produce a completely flat line histogram.

    But only if the gradient tool is set not to favour one, or boths ends of the gradient. (An issue that can be be confounded by the image profile that a image processing software applies to that image - such a profile usually also contains a preferred gamma setting, i.e. applying the profile will change the tone distribution even if the gradient tool is completely 'true'.)

    And if the gradient length matches the number of possible different tones (or a whole number multiple), so that it does not need to be made to fit. (A 256 tone scale from black to white, for instance, is hard to fit in a 200 pixel wide image without having to drop quite a few tones.)

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin