Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,283   Posts: 1,534,916   Online: 854
      
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33
  1. #21
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,972
    Images
    65
    Ralph;

    Very nice. My feeling was, when I looked at the numbers, that you were pretty far down on the toe. Is that the case here?

    PE

  2. #22
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    the villages .centralflorida,USA and Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,457
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    Ralph;

    Very nice. My feeling was, when I looked at the numbers, that you were pretty far down on the toe. Is that the case here?

    PE
    Usually one gets stoned in these forums for proposing anything but a log density of 0.1 for Zone I. Nevertheless, I can live with it as long as I place the effective film speed at Zone I.5 or a log density of 0.17. Is that what you meant?
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  3. #23
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,972
    Images
    65
    Yes. That is what I mean. I still think that if you are on the toe too far, the shadows will be lacking detail or contrast. But, to each his own.

    Thanks Ralph.

    PE

  4. #24
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    the villages .centralflorida,USA and Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,457
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    ... I still think that if you are on the toe too far, the shadows will be lacking detail or contrast. ...
    I could not agree more. This is about the most important recipe for print quality! I wish more people would realize this. Please consider my chart as the absolute minimum negative densities required.

    On the other hand, I can only pick two points on the characteristic curve. Whatever happens in between is a material-dependant response to light and development.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  5. #25
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,972
    Images
    65
    IMHO too many people underexpose! And, they are not fully aware of it either.

    PE

  6. #26
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    the villages .centralflorida,USA and Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,457
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    IMHO too many people underexpose! And, they are not fully aware of it either.

    PE
    I remember a Kodak representative showing me a panel of prints from -2 to +10 stop exposures. The '-' prints where all terrible. The '+' prints got better with exposure. Amazing!

    Richard Zakia showed a nice example of it in one of his books. I spoke to him recently, and unfortunately, he has lost the originals, but fully approved of the examples I published in WBM2 (attached).

    Some things are really simple, too simple, in fact, to be appreciated.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Latitude3.jpg  
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  7. #27
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,972
    Images
    65
    Very nice Ralph.

    A while back I posted a series of Portra VC exposures at ISO 25, 50, 100, 160, 200, and 400. Same thing.

    PE

  8. #28
    dwross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Oregon Coast
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    803
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray Rogers View Post
    Hi Denise.

    Happy (if belated) New Year!

    Perhaps its crusty synapses but I really have read his series...
    and, over the years, I have even owned two complete sets!!
    but they and other goodies were stolen from me,
    so now... my Adams Engine just limps along on fumes.
    Ray,

    So sorry to hear about losing your books. Ouch! Now I hope even more that you find yourself a set of Adams', and any of the other books lost that you considered important. Photographers cannot live on fumes alone!

    d

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,560
    Ralph, Denise

    Thanks.

    Denise,
    They are very well written and a pleasure to read and learn from,
    but I doubt I will replace them anytime soon.


    ----------------------------------------------
    "All That Glitters Is Not, All That Glitters"
    patti smith

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by RalphLambrecht View Post
    Ray

    Try the attached for starters, but it is only a rough guide for a normal subject brightness range without expansion or contraction development.
    Ralph,

    I'm having shadows in Zone I 1/2 of a stop more dense compared to your table, midtone gets higher about 1/3 of a stop. I think that is more or less along your line of recommendations? Highlights, I'm not sure, characteristic curve I'm getting ends at higher densities.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin