Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,702   Posts: 1,548,461   Online: 872
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    harveyje's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    166
    The 55 micro was the first extra lens that I purchased after buying my Nikomat (I had just arrived in Okinawa). I have always loved the lens and macro photography. I also use it frequently for general photography. You must understand that the only automatic Nikon I have is a Nikkormat EL - the others are all completely manual.
    John Harvey
    Colorado Springs, CO
    harveyje@usa.net

  2. #12
    Dimitri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    81
    I've been using the 105 Micro Nikkor for the past year now. Excellent quality and 1:1 with no extension tubes or attachment lenses. A bit expensive, but worth every penny.

    AF is not that fast, but then MF is supposed to be used most of the time.

    The good thing about the lens is the working distance, which is large enough not to scare bees and such.

    For illumination I bought an el-cheapo ring flash (comes under various brand names, mine's a TOPCON) and have been using it with a reasonable success rate.
    Too many Chiefs not enough Indians.....

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    369
    I've been using the phenomenal Kiron 105 macro. 1:1 without any adapters or tubes. 2:1 with a quality 2x teleconverter.

    Kiron Kid

  4. #14
    Ara Ghajanian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Providence, RI
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    368
    Images
    14
    Hey everyone,
    Thanks for all the insight on macro photography. I got the lens on Saturday and it's great. Only one gripe: in order to get 1:1 with the 55mm micro and the PK-13 extension tube, the front of the lens has to be a couple of inches from the subject. Not very good if you're using lighting due to shadows, etc. I think I should have gotten the 105mm micro instead. Oh well, I'll deal with it. I'll have some images for the Gallery soon.
    Ara
    Just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wi
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    3,242
    I have used the 55mm 2.8 and 105mm f4. Both are lenses of good quality. The 105mm f4 required an f stop of f8 to really get sharp.

    If you get a bellows I would very much suggest that you also get adapter ring(s) allowing the use of both the Micro-Nikkor and your enlarging lenses to be used in the ordinary as well as the reversed mode. The reversed mode for 55mm threads will also allow use to use any lens with a 55mm thread reversed. For example if you wish to get a lot more magnification than is allowed by the Micro-Nikkor a reversed 28mm for example will allow you to do so and may give extraordinarily good results. If your interests, in the future, lie in really extremely large magnification than reversed movie camera lens can perform nicely. Of course one may use for example Photars and Luminars with great success they can be quite costly.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin