| |  | | | | |  | | Subscriber | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK) | Buffered Borax Developer
This is a variant of D76 I'd not seen before, it came from the Kodak Research Laboratories and was published in 1934 in Camera, Philadelphia and the BJP 26th Oct 1934 page 638-9 (and the BJP Almanac 1935).
Metol 2 gm
Hydroquinone 5 gm
Sodium Sulphite (anhyd) 100 gm
Borax 2 gm
Boric Acid 14 gm
Water to 1 litre
(The formula was published to make 500ml, figures doubled to make 1 litre for comparative purposes)
Ruyuki Suzuki, Sliver Garin.orb lists a D76x variant which is quite similar, but contains 0.125 gm Potassium Bromide & 15 gm Boric Acid.
Ian
| | | Total Comments
06-20-2009, 05:19 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Plymouth. UK.
Posts: 1,105
| I have seen this published before, but the only name I have seen for this formula is "Buffered Borax".
I like the original D-76 (ID-11) formula, DK-76, Adox M.Q-Borax and an M.Q developer that I recently designed for one-shot use which is diluted 1+4 from stock and uses carbonate + bicarbonate instead of borates. |
| |
06-20-2009, 05:50 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 9,381
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Tapscott. I have seen this published before, but the only name I have seen for this formula is "Buffered Borax".
I like the original D-76 (ID-11) formula, DK-76, Adox M.Q-Borax and an M.Q developer that I recently designed for one-shot use which is diluted 1+4 from stock and uses carbonate + bicarbonate instead of borates. | It was in the BJP Almanac I lent you in Cornwall
My preference out of all the variants is Adox Borax MQ which I used commercially for a number of years and also used to supply to 2 coomercial studio's.
Crawley adds Carbonate & Metabisulphite in some of his formulae, this forms a Carbonate/Bicarbonate buffer according to Henn.
Ian |
| |
06-20-2009, 08:12 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Plymouth. UK.
Posts: 1,105
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Grant It was in the BJP Almanac I lent you in Cornwall
My preference out of all the variants is Adox Borax MQ which I used commercially for a number of years and also used to supply to 2 coomercial studio's.
Crawley adds Carbonate & Metabisulphite in some of his formulae, this forms a Carbonate/Bicarbonate buffer according to Henn.
Ian | Yes, which is why I included it in my M.Q one-shot developer for consistency.
I prefer using developers one-shot. It is similar to D-76/ID-11 diluted 1+1, but with a bit more `bite`.  |
| |
06-24-2009, 12:22 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: King's Lynn, Norfolk, England
Posts: 497
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Tapscott. I have seen this published before, but the only name I have seen for this formula is "Buffered Borax".
I like the original D-76 (ID-11) formula, DK-76, Adox M.Q-Borax and an M.Q developer that I recently designed for one-shot use which is diluted 1+4 from stock and uses carbonate + bicarbonate instead of borates. | I use the carbonate / bicarbonate version as my standard developer. It gives similar tonality to standard ID11/D76 but a bit more sharpness that accentuates grain a little, which I like.
Try it with HP5+ (if you haven't already!)
What would be the 'real life' benefits of the boric acid buffered version?
Rob |
| | Sponsored Ad. ( Subscribers to APUG
have the option to remove this ad.) | | |
06-24-2009, 12:39 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 9,381
| The Buffered Borax version will gives better stability, Kodak published a number of variations. The commercial version of D76 is thought to be D76d which uses 8g Borax + 8g Boric acid as the buffer. A higher level of buffering will help maintain the pH particularly in replenished developer and also when used at 1+1 & 1+3.
,.
Ian |
| |
06-24-2009, 04:48 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: California
Posts: 3,070
| Ian, is there any evidence that the Borax-Boric acid buffering in D-76d has an effect on shelf life or maintaining a more stable level of activity with respect to storage duration?
__________________ I'd rather laugh with the sinners
Than cry with the saints
The sinners are much more fun |
| |
06-24-2009, 06:33 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 9,381
| I doubt it Brad  but that doesn't mean it might not help.
D76 & D76d were designed for heavy use initially as cine developers. the buffering will make it more stable in any use., but will have little effect on it's shelf life.
Ian |
| |
06-24-2009, 10:09 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: California
Posts: 3,070
| Thanks Ian. I've always kinda wondered about that...but, not enough to actually devise and conduct an experiment.
__________________ I'd rather laugh with the sinners
Than cry with the saints
The sinners are much more fun |
| |
06-27-2009, 07:01 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Plymouth. UK.
Posts: 1,105
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Archer I use the carbonate / bicarbonate version as my standard developer. It gives similar tonality to standard ID11/D76 but a bit more sharpness that accentuates grain a little, which I like.
Try it with HP5+ (if you haven't already!)
What would be the 'real life' benefits of the boric acid buffered version?
Rob | I`m glad that you`re getting getting good results with it Rob.
I am finding that it works well with all the B&W films I have used so far, from ISO 50 up to the ISO 400 speed group. I haven`t tried it yet with any films faster than ISO 400.
The development times as a guide are those for D-76/ID-11 when they are diluted 1+1, then adjust the times for the desired contrast if necessary. I see that you are getting results that you like with the development times extended around 10% longer than Ilford provide for ID-11 diluted 1+1.
The developer is already buffered and stores well. 
Last edited by Keith Tapscott.; 06-27-2009 at 07:08 AM..
|
| | | Article Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | |