Discussions: 45,157 | Messages: 608,938 | Members: 29,916 | Online: 390 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1102 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
635 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
950 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > Recipes > Film Developers - Staining > 510-Pyro

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-14-2008, 09:35 AM   #51 (permalink)
 
Snapshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterB View Post
In the absence of any replies to my question, I might re-phrase it....

Can people who are using or have used 510-Pyro let me know if you are happy with the shadow detail in your prints ?

regards
Peter
I've been reasonably satisfied with my shadow detail. For references sake, my main film is APX 100 and Tri-X 400 in 35mm format.
__________________
"The secret to life is to keep your mind full and your bowels empty. Unfortunately, the converse is true for most people."
Snapshot is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-14-2008, 09:45 AM   #52 (permalink)
 
David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 12,553
Default

Shadow detail is usually more of an exposure issue than a developer issue (not that either is irrelevant). I'm not a 510-pyro user, but if I were having shadow problems with any developer, I'd test with the same film rated at a lower speed before giving up on the developer.
__________________
Photography-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb/photo
Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb
David A. Goldfarb is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-15-2008, 01:30 PM   #53 (permalink)
 
juan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jacksonville Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,395
Default

I've used 510 Pyro, although not extensively. When Jay was online, we swapped some information, and I usually tested lower ISO than he did - thus, I needed more exposure to get shadow detail that I was satisfied with.

I have an opinion that could be right or wrong. Looking at Jay's prints on his site, he took portraits in which he seems to be interested in the higher values (skin tones.) He seems to let the shadows in the background fall away. I think for this reason, he didn't value the shadow detail as much as I did, and thus was able to use shorter exposures.

When I use more exposure, I've been happy with the shadow detail. I've used mainly Efke PL100 and Forte 400 with this developer.
juan
__________________
http://johnesimmons.com
juan is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-15-2008, 10:53 PM   #54 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: south central Missouri
Posts: 804
Default

I used Fred Pickers film speed test and shoot 120 tri-x 400 at it's rated speed. I actually had more of a problem getting the development time down (long enough for good contrast)for my color head.

Shadows have been fine.

Mike
mikebarger is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-16-2008, 06:09 AM   #55 (permalink)
 
PeterB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebarger View Post
I used Fred Pickers film speed test and shoot 120 tri-x 400 at it's rated speed. I actually had more of a problem getting the development time down (long enough for good contrast)for my color head.

Shadows have been fine.

Mike
Thanks everybody for your answers.

My main reason for enquiring about the shadows was to see if other folks had experienced similar problems to those detailed by Craig, where his shadows were so dead and empty and his (ED) curve showed a long, flat toe.
Because I have never made up my own dev. before, I didn't want to go to the trouble of buying the chemicals, mixing it up and using 510-Pyro if it had inherent flaws.

regards
Peter

Last edited by PeterB; 04-16-2008 at 06:15 AM. Reason: fixed up links
PeterB is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 04-16-2008, 02:33 PM   #56 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterB View Post
Can people who are using or have used 510-Pyro let me know if you are happy with the shadow detail in your prints ?

regards
Peter
Very happy.
c6h6o3 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-13-2008, 11:35 PM   #57 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Bernardino, CA
Posts: 82
Default

So, where can one find the recipe? Google search showed nada.
The first post in this thread reads like the recipe is their, but the author forgot to include it.
Bill
wildbillbugman is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-14-2008, 12:06 AM   #58 (permalink)
 
PeterB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildbillbugman View Post
So, where can one find the recipe? Google search showed nada.
The first post in this thread reads like the recipe is their, but the author forgot to include it.
Bill
I can point you to half of the recipe (i.e. just the ingredients) here. The method/instructions for mixing and using those ingredients are probably so intuitive that Jay left them off from that page.

BTW, despite Jay's personal tragedy preventing him from practicing photography again, he appears to have been very active on photo.net for the past 5 months.

regards
Peter
PeterB is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-14-2008, 05:06 PM   #59 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Bernardino, CA
Posts: 82
Default

Thank you Peter.
I am new to the Recipe section of APUG. There is alot here to be learned.
I am currently focusing my efforts on in-camera B&W emulsion making. And the right developer for the emulsion is critical. So I will become a reguler here.
I do not know who Jay is, but my heart is with him.
Regards,
Bill
wildbillbugman is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-16-2008, 09:55 PM   #60 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: south central Missouri
Posts: 804
Default

I guess I didn't realize the format of the articles section had changed. The formula used to be in a little box to the side

TEA 75ml
Ascorbic acid 5g
Pyrogallol 10g
Phenidone .25g
TEA to make 100ml

Dilution 1+100
mikebarger is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using