Color Dye-Transfer Prints for the Modern Hobbyist - *Imbibition for For the People!*
HISTORY of the PROCESS
In 1994 Kodak discontinued the "Kodak Dye-Transfer Process". Since that time, only those who have hoarded those materials or have been enterprising enough to manufacture their own silver-halide matrix films (Jim Browning) have been able to make dye-transfer prints.
However, this is a curious & unfortunate state of affairs! The earliest dye-transfer (or dye imbibition) prints were made by exploiting the same mechanism that modern day carbon & gum printers use; the ability of potassium or ammonium dichromate to harden gelatin upon exposure to UV light.
The 2 most common ways to a make a dye-imbibition print both rely upon a gelatin matrix.
In recent times (Kodak) the preferred method was with a silver-halide emulsion on a clear base. A negative is exposed through the base and developed in a tanning developer which hardens the gelatin in situ with the developed silver. This is then "etched" in hot water, which removes the gelatin that remains untanned (soluble) to reveal a relief image that clings to the base. This gelatin relief consists of varying depths that correspond directly the shadow density in the photograph.
The other method is very similar, but instead of using a silver-halide emulsion, a gelatin layer is sensitized with dichromates and exposed (again, through the base) under a negative and etched in hot water. It is this variable gelatin relief that absorbs dye to varying degrees, thus continuous tone is possible.
An obvious difference between these 2 methods is that the silver-halide emulsion can be exposed under an enlarger whereas the DCG (dichromated gelatin) requires an enlarged negative for contact printing. This is one important reason for the success of the silver-halide method.
However, the use of DCG matrices has many precedents, most notably the Pinatype process; outlined here in this British Journal of Photography article from 1907. However, the first application of this property that gelatin will imbibe & transfer a dye was disclosed by Charles Cros, a Frenchman, who called it the Hydrotype process in the late 1800's. Another process was Jos Pe. It should be noted that the Pinatype uses a slightly different type of matrix (one that is not etched = planographic, as opposed to relief) and correspondingly uses a different class of dyes and is exposed under positives, interestingly enough. No need to go into this in depth at the moment however....
So, to make a dye-transfer print, a relief matrix is soaked in a bath of an acid-dye, the dye imbibes (or migrates) into the gelatin relief image and this is then rolled into contact with a sheet of receiving paper. The dye transfers from the matrix to the receiving paper.
If 3 matrices are prepared from color separation negatives, and dyed in the appropriate secondary dye colors (CMY), and finally transferred in register to the receiving paper, a full color image is formed. This is the process in a nutshell.
Although my work on this technique is far from complete, I want to at least disclose and compile all the information so far gathered, so that other people who are interested may join the effort.
- PREPARING THE MATRICES
First, the modern worker needs a suitable clear support. This is found in Photo Formulary's Estar Melinex (mispelled on their website as 'melenex'). This is a thin, clear support that is subbed to accept emulsions. This subbing cannot imbibe any dye itself, which is ideal becaue otherwise you will get stained highlights. Although I have not tested any other materials, I'm curious what else might be suitable. Overhead transparency paper perhaps? Whatever the substrate is, it must be treated so that it "grabs" the gelatin, otherwise it will easily peel off. Search "corona discharge" for more on this, or APUG member hrst's work with substrates. Fortunately, there is an existing product at the moment.
The melinex scratches easily, and care should be taken to keep it as unblemished as possible. Vaseline or some kind silicon oil (PE) might be able to hide the scratches when it comes time for exposure (remember, we're exposing through the base).
As a side note, another option would be to do a "carbon transfer" of the clear relief image (or pigmented relief image for that matter) and this could become the matrix. This would eliminate the need for exposing through the base and a special substrate for the matrix.
2nd, you must coat the melinex with a gelatin layer. This is effectively no different than pouring carbon tissues (sans pigment). I have chosen 6% gelatin with 1% sorbitol, though there is nothing yet to suggest that this is superior to any other concentration, and not enough testing has been done to see what effect the gelatin composition will have upon the matrix characteristics. This gelatin solution pours nicely and makes a thin coating; this has been my only criteria so far. Each worker will probaly find their preferred way to achieve this, just like in carbon pouring.
3rd, the matrix blank must be sensitized. Having very little experience with this personally, I can only say that it will be necessary to have the back surface clean of any splotches before exposure, and also the deepest layers of the gelatin must be sensitized. It has been suggested (Vaughn) that this is not really a concern.
Fortunately, the rigid densitometric requirements of traditional dye-transfer printing can likely be thrown out the window when using DCG matrices. Traditional AgX matrix films had but one contrast grade, necessitating strict control of contrast in the sep negs. Thanks to the contrast control available from dichromate sensitization, considerable leaway should be had.
Chalk one up for DCG-imbibition!
4th, UV exposure under negatives. The ins & outs of making color separations are best left alone in this discussion, but tri-color gum printers will probably find their negatives excellent for preliminary testing. I am exploring the route of making enlarged negatives on mammography x-ray film (with an intermediate panchromatic step), which so far has proved promising.
5th, etching in hot (120░F) water, just like carbon. Due to the nature of the hardening by dichromates, control should be exercised to ensure consistency. This difficulty is eloquently (if not somewhat discouragingly) described in this post.
6th, at this point, one should probably clear (sodium sulfite?) the matrices and perhaps harden them. However, I can't recommend anything at the moment. Some hardeners, like chrome alum, might act unfavorably as mordants in the matrix, where we don't want them. Will advise.
As it stands now, obtaining appropriate dyes is the single biggest roadblock. Recently, a couple boxes of Kodak dyes came through eBay and sold for over $100 a pop. Not a sustainable solution.
Jim Browning has listed the following dyes in his PDF for Dye Transfer Materials: Acid Blue 45 (or 25; bluer and transfers slower), Acid Red 80 (or 289*), Acid Yellow 11 (or 23*) [*brighter colors at the expense of light-fastness].
J.S. Friedman, author of the monumental "History of Color Photography", lists a number of textile dyes that may be suitable for the process and I would encourage people to explore that route. Although the color demands might not be perfectly met, textile dyes are easily obtainable and might be perfectly satisfactory for the imaginative printer. These textile dyes, known as "Acid Fast", will likely work and are available very cheaply. I suspect that their light-fastness is good if they are well regarded by textile folks.
Many sellers on eBay have large quantities of dyes, usually being liquidated from old labs, etc. All dyes have multiple names, so consult a book like Sigma-Aldrich's Handbook of Stains, Dyes & Indicators (easily available from most University libraries) to find out alternate names, chemical information, lightfastness and color quality.
The best option might be to find a manufacturer that offers samples of their dyes. A sample is likely to be sufficient for many, many prints, or alternatively, you might wish to see what their minimum quantity is.
When all is said and done, availability of dyes will be the key to truly making modern-day dye-transfer a reality. I am fortunate to have a wide variety of old dyes given to me by a chemist who researches dye-transfer, in addition to synthesizing his own dyes. So, perhaps there is hope that in the future we can provide better options in this regard. In the meantime, I will use these dyes to test my materials and will be simultaneously exploring alternative dye options, such as textile dyes.
A word about dyes: acid dyes happen to have an affinity for gelatin, that is, they will stain it. This affinity is increased with lower pH (more acid), and thus the receiving paper is soaked in an acid solution to encourage the dyes to leave the matrix and transfer more completely. Logically enough, to clear the matrix after transferring, a dilute ammonia solution will liberate the dye from the gelatin. A matrix can be reused many times, another reason why this process was so successful (ultimately superceding carbro in the industry).
There have been other methods to make prints with different classes of dyes like Pinatype above, which used "Pina" dyes... a.k.a. a proprietary dye (though Friedman lists the probable candidates). Also, there have been methods to use basic dyes, which are exceptionally brilliant & pure, but are very quick to fade. Since these dyes react differently with gelatin, different materials & methods are required. See Friedman if interesetd.
But acid dyes are the preferred class because they are quite good in color, and are the most permament of dyes. Other dyes that will act in the same manner as acid dyes are "direct" and "reactive" dyes, though I am far from an expert on these matters.
For an excellent paper on the requirements & testing of dyes, please follow these links -> Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, to Dyes For Imbibition Printing by Colton & Thronson.
Any information on dye-transfer printing, such as that given by Jim Browning, or Ctein, or Kodak's publication E-80 will give you a solid idea of what is necessary for transferring the print, as this function is independant of the kind of matrix used. At the moment, this is my least studied area of the process so I'd hate to give misinformation. It is however, pretty straight forward.
Basically you soak the matrices in their respective dye baths until they reach equilibrium (that is, the time it takes to absorb all the dye that they can hold). Then, you transfer them to a dilute acetic acid bath of about 2%. This rinses the excess dye off. At this point, in the acid bath, the dye will not exit the relief, and if the 3 matrices are not registered yet, they can be visually aligned in this bath and punched. The color image will be visible at this point.
Each matrix is then rolled onto the receiving paper, one after the other. The time that it takes for the dye to exit the matrix and migrate to the receiver paper will be a function of the dye, and will likely vary (as it did in the Kodak process). Standard practice is to transfer each color twice.
Another important aspect is the receiving paper itself and the pre-treatment bath. Kodak supplied a pre-bath for the receiving paper, but at the moment I couldn't tell you exactly what is in it. It stands to reason that it would be an acidic bath, and indeed, a sloshing of vinegar (not very scientific, nor ideally probably) helped a down & dirty test succeed while testing with a food dye. See here.
So as you can see, considerable room for experimentation is present. For initial testing, fixed out photo paper will be more than sufficient and actually the hardeners present in the emulsion, or from some fixers, will act as mordants in their own right.
An idealized receiving paper will have a dedicated mordant. F.E. Ives first suggested this method in U.S. patent #1,121,187, 'Photographic Printing Process', from December 15th, 1914. Basically, the mordant increases the paper's affinity to hold onto the dye (from the French word mordere, "to bite").
F.E. Ives has many earlier patents describing the use of DCG matrices for imbibition printing. Friedman doesn't spend much ink in discussing dye-transfer matrices of this type, instead simply saying that F.E. Ive's patents on the subject can be considered the authoritative text. Indeed, I would recommend anyone interested to seek them out, and I'll be more than happy to include the patent #'s. (p.s. They are listed in Friedman, and that book is available on Google books).
So as you can see, the work is just beginning. But all the information is out there and nothing is beyond the scope of the hobbyist. It just isn't formalized as of yet, so there is a lot of original & novel work that must be done before we can start "spreading the gospel" and telling people exactly how to do it.
I hope this will encourage a few people to give it a go, and remember that if tri-color seems daunting, there's certainly nothing wrong with monochrome prints. That would greatly expand the list of possible dyes for the process.
More to come in the future...
- Chris Holmquist, holmburgers, 2011 -
Last edited by holmburgers; 05-25-2011 at 04:20 PM. Click to view previous post history.
Thanks Jim, your commendation is very encouraging & nice to hear.
Is this the M1 mordant post you're referring to? -> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/d...r/message/3526
Thanks also for the note on the conditioner. I tend to post in haste (post haste? haha) and often make erroneous claims only to learn otherwise down the road! It has been recommended that a dilute sodium acetate solution will act as a paper conditioner; given that I don't have any of the "official stuff".
Ultimately I'd like to hand-coat receiving paper, but having the M1 mordant formula might come in handy. In fact, I wonder if a plain gelatin coated paper, such as final-transfer papers in carbon, would work if mordanted in M1. I'm intrigued by the fact that these papers don't keep well. I guess I would have figured that these chemicals were fairly inert and would keep indefinitely. Does the M1 mordant have any hardening charactersitics?
The dye-imbibition system sure is a complicated beast. It's probably not any more complex than b&w silver-halide systems, but the fact that so few people practice it makes it much less prevalent in the "collective knowledge-base".
If you are the big tree, we are the small axe
Paper Prep for DT
>Is this the M1 mordant post you're referring to? -> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/d...r/message/3526
Yes, that is the posting, follow the instructions there and you will get good results.
>It has been recommended that a dilute sodium acetate solution will act as a paper conditioner; given that I don't have any of the "official stuff".
There are formulas both for Kodak's version (which requires Formalin), and Bob Pace's formula which is simply a buffer solution of Trieth and AA, IIRC. If you have a pH meter (necessity), you will use it to titrate the buffer to the proper pH.
>Ultimately I'd like to hand-coat receiving paper, but having the M1 mordant formula might come in handy. In fact, I wonder if a plain gelatin coated paper, such as final-transfer papers in carbon, would work if mordanted in M1. I'm intrigued by the fact that these papers don't keep well. I guess I would have figured that these chemicals were fairly inert and would keep indefinitely. Does the M1 mordant have any hardening charactersitics?
A Baryta base paper coated with a thick gelatin coating will serve well. It needs to be hardened, but not overly hardened. If you can't incorporate a mordant when coating the paper, use the M1 mordant to post mordant it. You are right, the life of an aluminum mordant is only a few weeks. I think that it continues to harden the gelatin until it won't accept the dyes readily, or it won't conform to the the undulations in the the matrix, causing bleeding, particularly out of the image area into the borders.
Regards - Jim
There are several patents with alternate mordants that I have here somewhere. I'll try to post the numbers if I can find them. The chemicals are compatible with gelatin. The M1 mordant is NOT compatible with gelatin or emulsions which are to be coated.
Does this arise from the fact that it will harden it, resulting in a big blob of insoluble gelatin?
Originally Posted by PE
One patent that I know of is U.S.P. 2,952,566, assigned to Louis Condax (EK), Mordanted Photographic Imbibtion Dye Printing Blank.
Haven't actually read it yet..
If you are the big tree, we are the small axe
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
The Louie Condax patent is probably one of them. But yes, the Alum in the gelatin is a good hardener. So, you must apply it or activate it after coating.
just wanted to pass along this link to David Doubley's archive of Dye-Transfer documents. It's pretty well excellent... http://daviddoubley.com/DyeTransfer.htm
If you are the big tree, we are the small axe
I'm one of those folks hoarding matrix film, which I hope will stay good in the freezer a few more years until I retire and have enough time to seriously dye transfer print. In the meantime I've acquired all the necessary supplies and equipment, have mastered separations and masks using analog dkrm techniques exclusively, and have worked out the protocol for wash-off relief technique, which seems a little more straightforward than tanning development. This is a process which has tactile appeal (especially if you make your living using a computer and are damn sick of it); but is also capable of rendering hues with a
vivacity very difficult or impossible to achieve with inkjet or other digital color printing techniques.
Amen to the part about being sick of computers. That's what I always think... I spend all day on one, and when I get home I do everything in my power not to sit in front of another.
When you say wash-off relief technique, are you referring to dichromate bleaching as in Kodak's older "Wash-Off Relief" process? Are you using that with matrix films or something else? That's very intriguing, and is a 3rd technique for the formation of a relief matrix that I don't think has been mentioned in this thread yet.
Thanks for joining the conversation, and welcome to APUG!
If you are the big tree, we are the small axe
Hi. Having tested the alternatives and the fussiness of them, I wanted a slower-acting matrice developer which I could potentially use in drums and that was easy to mix. I settled on a tweak of HC-110 with post hardening. No dichromate involved. A few minutes slower than tanning developer but much simpler and seems to give comparable results when printing. I happen to be using the newer Efke matrix film, but the older Kodak film should work similarly. Dyes are no problem. I have Kodak dyes as well as a set of Pylam dyes. There are also a variety of mordants which can be used, but uranyl nitrate is a good choice. The trick with the paper is allegedly to find one which contains pig gelatin. I have been fixing out an EMaks paper and getting sharper images than with some of the others. But I'm still in the early stages of this myself, with not much time either, since I'm also involved in Ciba, Type C, and silver gelatin printing.
Hi Drew, you should try using the M1 mordant with the Emaks. That gives very good sharpness (much better than simply fixing out). The sharpness is comparable to the Kodak DT paper. I find that you do have to scrub the surface of the paper with a paper towel and a photo-flo solution to remove any residual mordant which remains on the surface. If you don't, you can get some blotches, and some mordanting of dye back in the matrix. I like to clean the matrices with matrix cleaner on every transfer when using the M1 mordanted paper, you will get more consistant results this way. Once nice thing about the Aluminum mordant is that the cyans (and greens and blues) render much better than with the Kodak paper. This increases the color gamut in that region. Note that the Cyan hue conversion only happens after drying (I'm not sure if it needs to be a hot drying. I haven't tested warm air drying to see if the conversion happens at low temperature). I like the high-gloss quality of the Emaks, and the brighter white compared to the Kodak paper. But mainly, I like the idea of not having to worry about running out of a hoarded supply. The Emaks paper is still available from Freestyle, and it is pretty inexpensive.
Another way of increasing color gamut is to display the print under LED lighting. I was trepidatious about the demise of Tungsten lighting, but now I think that LED lighting will actually be superior to Tungsten or Tungsten Halogen for viewing DT prints. I have been using an Ecosmart Bright White A19 40 W equivilent light in a Luxo-Lamp for viewing prints. While I make my final decisions based on a Tungsten Halogen light since that is still predominant in galleries, I use the LED bulb for most viewing. This bulb is rated as 3000 deg. K with an 85 CRI. I find that the effective CRI is actually higher than that since the color error is not in hue, but in chroma (saturation). The bulb doesn't disturb the hues, but it does increase the saturation, and the gamut. My only complaint is that it needs to be brighter for exhibiting prints, to get the necessary 650 lux it has to be about 2 feet away. I'll continue to look for LED lighting which is brighter than this but which has the same qualities.
- Jim Browning