Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,296   Posts: 1,535,723   Online: 870
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    6

    Lomo LCA - weird negative - what's going on here?

    Hi,


    First post here - be kind!


    I have a fair amount of experience with quirky cameras and developing my own stuff - I keep and use a fairly sizable collection (they should all be in the signature - if I can remember them all!), and I have a fair bit of developing experience - but I can't quite work out what's going on with this negative.

    It comes from a roll shot on my Lomo LCA..

    Several frames from the roll worked out fine, however, a large portion of the film came out blank (unexposed, not overexposed), save for "light leak" looking patches at intervals. In a few of these patches you can occasionally see ghosts of an image.

    I'm going to try and attach a scan of an affected portion of the negative here... note the slight ghosting of an image in one of the "light leak" patches:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Scan524.jpg 
Views:	94 
Size:	39.7 KB 
ID:	63948


    I've had sticking shutter problems on this camera before, but that doesn't explain the partial images - or does it?

    The shutter seems to work fine when operated with the back open and no film loaded.

    The frames that worked weren't all together on the roll - there were half a dozen frames that shot fine - followed by a portion of film like the attached, followed by another few correct fames, then a further portion of blankness.

    I don't suppose it helps, but for sake of giving all the information, the roll was Kentmere 400, and was developed in FD10 1+14 at 20 degrees for 18 mins.

    The numbers in the edges of the film developed correctly throughout - this, together with the successful frames leads me to diagnose the problem occurring in the camera, not with the development.

    Any ideas?!

    Cheers!
    Digital: Canon EOS 450d, Pentax 750z Medium Format: Yashica Mat 124, Rolleicord II, Zeiss Ikon 515/2, Holga 120TLR, Kodak No. 1 Autographic Jr, Voigtlander Bessa, Houghton & Butler JB "Ensign", Lubitel 166b 35mm: Pentax ME Super, Chinon CE4, Olympus OM10, Zorki-4K (Jupiter 8), Fed 2 (Industar), Lomo LC-A, Lomokino, Voigtlander Vito B 127: Zeiss Ikon Baby Ikonta Instant: Polaroid SX70, Polaroid 450, Polaroid Spectra, Shackman Multi-Shot

  2. #2
    EASmithV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,874
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images
    122
    That appears to be light leaking. Check the foam seals on the back of the camera door, are they still there?
    www.EASmithV.com

    "The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera."— Dorothea Lange
    http://www.flickr.com/easmithv/
    RIP Kodachrome

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    6
    Hi, cheers for the reply. The seals are a bit degraded, but not bad - I've seen worse! The thing is that the frames that turned out fine show no evidence of light leaking... ???!
    Digital: Canon EOS 450d, Pentax 750z Medium Format: Yashica Mat 124, Rolleicord II, Zeiss Ikon 515/2, Holga 120TLR, Kodak No. 1 Autographic Jr, Voigtlander Bessa, Houghton & Butler JB "Ensign", Lubitel 166b 35mm: Pentax ME Super, Chinon CE4, Olympus OM10, Zorki-4K (Jupiter 8), Fed 2 (Industar), Lomo LC-A, Lomokino, Voigtlander Vito B 127: Zeiss Ikon Baby Ikonta Instant: Polaroid SX70, Polaroid 450, Polaroid Spectra, Shackman Multi-Shot

  4. #4
    winger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Page County, IA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,405
    Images
    47
    If the frames that are fine were only in the position for exposure for a short time, then they might not have been affected by a light leak. If, for instance, you shot three in a row fairly quickly, the middle one may not have been in the spot where it would have been leaked on for as long as the other two frames.
    The frames you attached do look like a leak to me and one that could be from the side seal of the back rather than the middle or top/bottom somewhere.
    The light leaks could be a different issue than the unexposed frames. Were the frames that came out in the same amount of light as the ones that didn't?

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    6
    Potentially not - the film has been in the camera for a fairly long period of time - and I have a feeling a lot of the frames that didn't come out were shot on a summer camping trip - meaning the camera could have been in bright sunlight more at that time than at the time of the successful frames. It just seems odd to me the potential shutter issue and the potential light leak issue should only affect the same portions of the film.

    Also, seeing a small portion of image in the light leaked area wouldn't happen if the shutter wasn't firing - the only thing i can think of there is that perhaps the camera was massively underexposing for those frames, and the leaked light brought affected areas of the film to an acceptable exposure level for the development - but being 400 speed film shot in pretty bright sunlight, if it were underexposing it would have to be firing the shutter at speeds I don't think the LCA is capable of!

    The only other possible explanation I can think of would be that if by pure chance the light leak was forming a pinhole and the camera was left in one place for a while in bright light, then the result could be an image rendered onto the film in the leaked area?
    Digital: Canon EOS 450d, Pentax 750z Medium Format: Yashica Mat 124, Rolleicord II, Zeiss Ikon 515/2, Holga 120TLR, Kodak No. 1 Autographic Jr, Voigtlander Bessa, Houghton & Butler JB "Ensign", Lubitel 166b 35mm: Pentax ME Super, Chinon CE4, Olympus OM10, Zorki-4K (Jupiter 8), Fed 2 (Industar), Lomo LC-A, Lomokino, Voigtlander Vito B 127: Zeiss Ikon Baby Ikonta Instant: Polaroid SX70, Polaroid 450, Polaroid Spectra, Shackman Multi-Shot

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,931
    My commiserations and short of a full examination of it you may not get to the bottom of it.Even then it might be difficult to identify the exact problem

    The conclusion I'd draw is that unless a clearly fixable fault is identified the camera is only fit for the bin but that's just me. You may like the uncertainty and never knowing which future frames will be totally defective and no, I am not trying to be sarcastic. It seems to me that anything Lomo has that attraction of uncertainty for those who enjoy that

    It won't come as any surprise that I won't be joining that club any time soon

    pentaxuser

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    6
    Agreed that part of the appeal of lomo is unpredictable results - but there's a line somewhere between a few light leaks and fuzzy lens-effects and having 70% of a roll of film not come out at all!

    I'll work the shutter a bit without a film in and then put another roll through it and see what happens... if it doesn't work after that i'll not bin it, I'll sell it (with the caveat that I don't know whether it works properly)! LC-As are going for £80 on ebay now, and the "new" one made by lomography is £200 - why anyone would pay that amount of money for a cheap point-and-shoot with a plastic lens, I don't know - but there you go.

    I'll not spend too much time and effort on it - I have other old but "decent quality" cameras that need some TLC from time to time but the results are much more rewarding when they do work...

    Just had the shutter in bits on my old Zeiss Ikon 515/2 after seizing it by changing speeds after cocking the shutter (stupid non-thinking mistake) - took a few hours to free the shutter and then a decent amount of time on top of that to get the front lens screwed on in the right position to focus correctly. Time well spent as it's now working again and it produces seriously lovely results... just shows 70 year old German engineering beats 30 year old Russian engineering!
    Digital: Canon EOS 450d, Pentax 750z Medium Format: Yashica Mat 124, Rolleicord II, Zeiss Ikon 515/2, Holga 120TLR, Kodak No. 1 Autographic Jr, Voigtlander Bessa, Houghton & Butler JB "Ensign", Lubitel 166b 35mm: Pentax ME Super, Chinon CE4, Olympus OM10, Zorki-4K (Jupiter 8), Fed 2 (Industar), Lomo LC-A, Lomokino, Voigtlander Vito B 127: Zeiss Ikon Baby Ikonta Instant: Polaroid SX70, Polaroid 450, Polaroid Spectra, Shackman Multi-Shot

  8. #8
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,821
    Images
    108
    I used 3 LCA until today and first one was magnificient. I hope you did not spend that 200-300 dollars to that camera. Its 35 dollars here in Istanbul and nobody wants them.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    6
    No, I picked it up for about £30 - but if it keeps eating film without good results then the money spent on it is rapidly increasing! I have seen great results from them and I like the fact that they have all the quirkiness combined with an automatic exposure, so you can be more spontaneous than with a manual camera - but as it's something I bought for a bit of fun it's not something I'm necessarily bothered about persevering with if it's going to be a great effort. I'll probably get rid, but if I see another one at a non-silly price then I might give 'em another go...
    Digital: Canon EOS 450d, Pentax 750z Medium Format: Yashica Mat 124, Rolleicord II, Zeiss Ikon 515/2, Holga 120TLR, Kodak No. 1 Autographic Jr, Voigtlander Bessa, Houghton & Butler JB "Ensign", Lubitel 166b 35mm: Pentax ME Super, Chinon CE4, Olympus OM10, Zorki-4K (Jupiter 8), Fed 2 (Industar), Lomo LC-A, Lomokino, Voigtlander Vito B 127: Zeiss Ikon Baby Ikonta Instant: Polaroid SX70, Polaroid 450, Polaroid Spectra, Shackman Multi-Shot

  10. #10
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,821
    Images
    108
    Newer the LCA , worse the lens. Now they produce them in China. If you have not a good camera and money , its a great camera. I advise you to waste film money in to your Ikonta, Ikon or Rolleicord. There is nohing special at LCA , it does what the others do. You will go mad when the zinc connectors oxide in the battery department to be needed to carved out with a lock key everytime you want to take picture. LOMO is great at cinema optics even matchless if you have 400 to 25000 dollars but not the cameras are great. Some Kievs , Some Feds , East German stuff were competitors.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin