Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,289   Posts: 1,535,371   Online: 798
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    jp498's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Owls Head ME
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,467
    Images
    74

    polaroid numbers

    I'm going to surmise the numbering scheme polaroid used was so obscure, most people didn't know what they sold.

    I started photography in the 1980's and only messed a tiny bit with polaroid because a family member had one or two. I really like the pull-apart images, but preferred a camera "system" and wasn't into LF at the time. I likened their numbering to printer ink cartridges today. You go into a store and instead of looking for a "669" box, you get a "J201" box or something like that. I really don't shop for printer ink though.

    It's not marketing. It's obfuscating the product. I'm sure there are many reasons for their failure, but I'm pretty certain this was at least a contributor.

    I wish I'd know more about their offerings when it was available.

  2. #2
    ann
    ann is offline

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,870
    Images
    26
    we never had any issues with finding the "correct product". there failure is spelled DIGITAL, then of course selling the company to a fellow who wanted the brand name for his tv's.
    http://www.aclancyphotography.com

  3. #3
    jcoldslabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    173
    I may be missing the nature of your complaint, but how was Polaroid's product numbering scheme of Type 51, 52, 53, 55, 664, 665, 669, etc. any more or less obfuscating than, say, Kodak's 110, 116, 120, 122, 124, 126, 135, 620....?

    Jonathan

  4. #4
    ann
    ann is offline

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,870
    Images
    26
    I am saying, it wasn't a problem for me, as I knew exactly what film type i was using went with which number.

    It seems I don't understand your complaint about the system.
    http://www.aclancyphotography.com

  5. #5
    one90guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Texas Gulf Coast
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    297
    I bought my 1st Polaroid in the late 60's, do not remember which model but do not recall ever having a problem on which and where to get the film. I even carried mine to Vietnam and still used it into the 70's. A few years ago started using them again, sadly less film choices now.

    David
    “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron.”
    ― Dwight D. Eisenhower

  6. #6
    xya
    xya is offline

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    195
    in case of doubt http://www.rwhirled.com/landlist/landhome.htm a wonderful page where you can find what you are looking for. I don't think that they cared about a consistent numbering system. the just continued inventing every week. yes, they reused some numbers even several times, but where is the real problem?

  7. #7
    wiltw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    742
    Not much confusion...the right-most number:

    x5 = instant B&W print and neg
    x8 = instant color print
    x9 = extended range instant color print

    The left-most digits
    5x = 4x5"
    55x = 4x5" film packs
    66x = 3-1/4 x 4-1/4
    77x = 3-1/4 x 4-1/4 pro emulsion of 600 films

  8. #8
    jp498's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Owls Head ME
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,467
    Images
    74
    Thanks guys/gals. The Internet is great for this!

  9. #9
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,525
    Quote Originally Posted by wiltw View Post
    Not much confusion...the right-most number:

    x5 = instant B&W print and neg
    x8 = instant color print
    x9 = extended range instant color print

    The left-most digits
    5x = 4x5"
    55x = 4x5" film packs
    66x = 3-1/4 x 4-1/4
    77x = 3-1/4 x 4-1/4 pro emulsion of 600 films

    It is not as simple as the above:

    The last two ciphers in combination indicated the emulsion.
    The first cipher (including its absence) indicated the format.

    Though, to realize that I needed a flip-chart type prospectus that Polaroid once published. Thus: it was complicated (as with the competitors), but logical.

    However this systematic had been added as well in the sheet as in the spooled film range by types given a name.

    (I refer to the mid-90's Situation.)
    Last edited by AgX; 03-19-2013 at 01:22 PM. Click to view previous post history.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin