Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,693   Posts: 1,482,441   Online: 902
      
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,130
    Images
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by bsdunek View Post
    While it is heavy on the Pentax 110, scroll to the bottom and there is info on the speed setting tab.
    http://cameraquest.com/pentx110.htm
    I enjoy my 110 cameras with Lomography Orca B&W and Color Tiger. I, being a good AUPG'r, process the B&W myself. It's a pretty nice film with a real speed of 100. The Color Tiger is 200, and also does very well. I tried some Lobster red scale and found it interesting. Made an 11X14 print and was surprised how good it looked. People don't believe it was done with 110.
    While I do most of my work with 35mm and 6X7, I sure have fun with 110 and my Minox.
    Thanks for the info that's great to hear, question your 11 x 14 print was that optically printed or scanning the negative and then printing that separately?

    I know that lomography had a black-and-white film at least one, and I know they also make a C-41 version that is also black and white I believe, as well as the color ones, and the red scale which is just the film with the emulsion side in instead of out I believe...

    I was hoping to find a 400 speed black-and-white film if possible, anyone know who sells that, new?
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller

  2. #32
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,130
    Images
    210
    I did it, I bought a few Lomo rolls of the 110 film. Still looking for 400 speed stuff.
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller

  3. #33
    bsdunek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,058
    Images
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post
    Thanks for the info that's great to hear, question your 11 x 14 print was that optically printed or scanning the negative and then printing that separately?

    I know that lomography had a black-and-white film at least one, and I know they also make a C-41 version that is also black and white I believe, as well as the color ones, and the red scale which is just the film with the emulsion side in instead of out I believe...

    I was hoping to find a 400 speed black-and-white film if possible, anyone know who sells that, new?
    I should have clarified, that the 11X14 print from 110 redscale was commercially done. I don't print color, Just B&W. In that case, yes, it was a digital print from scanned film.
    w
    As for 400 speed B&W, there was a brand called Fukkatsu around last year. They must have made just one run each of 100 & 400 B&W and color films. I bought a bunch, but no one seems to have it any more. The last was at Ultrafine On Line: http://www.ultrafineonline.com/fu110foco400.html But their out now too.

    You can reload: http://www.subclub.org/darkroom/roll110.htm or http://www.geocities.com/markhahn2000/110_reload.htm or http://www.subclub.org/darkroom/splitter.htm

    Enjoy!
    Bruce

    Moma don't take my Kodachrome away!
    Oops, Kodak just did!


    BruceCSdunekPhotography.zenfolio.com

  4. #34
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,130
    Images
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by bsdunek View Post
    I should have clarified, that the 11X14 print from 110 redscale was commercially done. I don't print color, Just B&W. In that case, yes, it was a digital print from scanned film.
    w
    As for 400 speed B&W, there was a brand called Fukkatsu around last year. They must have made just one run each of 100 & 400 B&W and color films. I bought a bunch, but no one seems to have it any more. The last was at Ultrafine On Line: http://www.ultrafineonline.com/fu110foco400.html But their out now too.

    You can reload: http://www.subclub.org/darkroom/roll110.htm or http://www.geocities.com/markhahn2000/110_reload.htm or http://www.subclub.org/darkroom/splitter.htm

    Enjoy!
    Thanks, I'll keep an eye out for some 400 speed film anyway, and I'll Google that company I'm sure some of it might be on eBay.

    It's just not worth bothering to reload for me, doing all that cutting and splitting etc., I really wish Kodak hadn't done what they did and instead made it so that regular old 16mm film you know movie film that is could be used, I thought about it possibly where you would be able to take a small piece of tape and cover over the exact amount of holes until you got to the next perforation that would pull that switch to tell the camera to be ready to shoot, but it all just seems like about a lot of work, The most unwilling to do is to reroll some 127 with backing paper but that's about it... After having done lots and lots of re-rolling of other film types, I'm convinced it's just not worth the time and effort for me...

    But thanks for the links they are of course helpful to anyone else looking to do this sort of thing and I'm sure that someone will come across this thread and find those links very useful.

    This place is awesome! Always in all of just how much great APUG knowledge there is out there.
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller

  5. #35
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California & Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,635
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    There are no adjustment to be made on that camera.
    I do not remember whether or not it compensated for film speed. I always thought it was a simple box camera that took sharp photographs. Prints might be hard to make on your own because the film was exposed curved and needed to be printed curved.
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  6. #36
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,130
    Images
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    I do not remember whether or not it compensated for film speed. I always thought it was a simple box camera that took sharp photographs. Prints might be hard to make on your own because the film was exposed curved and needed to be printed curved.
    Don't worry, I'll be using a scanner
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin