Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,769   Posts: 1,516,500   Online: 778
      
Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 96
  1. #31
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,883
    Images
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by Q.G. View Post
    And i.

    Looks a lot like they didn't get there yet, but just had to show something to appease a money lender.
    Not good enough to attract new/more money lenders.
    They seem to be bringing in a lot of money through sales of this product!

    As for the fade to black, it is probably a rejected Polaroid product that was there in a master roll. Or, it may have been packed or they tested the packaging equipment. In any case, it was most likely a reject!

    PE

  2. #32

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    They seem to be bringing in a lot of money through sales of this product!
    Or not, given that not everyone shares in the enthusiasm about what the film turned out to be.

  3. #33

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,525
    I confess that I hadn't followed the "Project" in any detail and I suppose I was just expecting that it was, effectively, the "old" polaroid films or equivalents being brought back into production.

    I can see that this new film has real possibilities in the hands of enthusiastic analogue photographers, but, given the price, the apparently tricky or critical handling, and the finished results, it's surely not going to persuade the average snapshotter to dig out his old Polaroid camera from the attic?

    Not being deliberately negative, but if I were an investor, I'd be worried that there would be sufficient ongoing sales volume from the more specialist "enthusiast" users for the project to be viable?

  4. #34
    clayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, CA | Kuching, MY | Jakarta, ID
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,838
    Images
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by railwayman3 View Post
    I can see that this new film has real possibilities in the hands of enthusiastic analogue photographers, but, given the price, the apparently tricky or critical handling, and the finished results, it's surely not going to persuade the average snapshotter to dig out his old Polaroid camera from the attic?
    Too late - they're already digging them out to dump on eBay.
    Stop worrying about grain, resolution, sharpness, and everything else that doesn't have a damn thing to do with substance.

    http://www.flickr.com/kediwah

  5. #35

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,525
    Quote Originally Posted by clayne View Post
    Too late - they're already digging them out to dump on eBay.
    True enough...there's certainly an enthusiast/cult demand, but I was thinking of the tens of millions who just want quick-and-easy instant family snaps and have swapped to d****** of one sort or another, they're not going to come back to Polaroid.

  6. #36

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    44
    I'm on the fence about this. I really want to try this new film and give it a chance, but I'm very disappointed with everything I've been seeing and reading about it. Some of the pictures I've seen look interesting, but most of them are just...yuck. Total crap. True, there is an interesting "dreamy" quality to them...but that novelty is going to wear off fast. Especially considering how expensive the film is and apparently how hard it is to use. Some people are saying you just have to be more patient and take more time with your shots...well, I already do that with medium format film. What's the point of putting all that work into composing your pictures but then you never know how they're going to turn out...especially when you only get 8 pictures per cartridge!

    I probably will look around for an SX-70 and I will try at least one cartridge just out of curiosity. But I don't know...I'm really on the fence about this.

    I also don't like how Impossible Project is trying to market themselves as if they're the ONLY ones left who are making any kind of instant film. Fuji makes very nice instant peel-apart film which works great with antique Polaroid Land cameras. The results are consistent, giving very nice pictures with beautiful colors...and their film is cheap. I especially like Fuji's black and white instant film, FP-3000. It captures absolutely beautiful pictures.

    Impossible Project needs to remember that. They act as if they're the saviours of instant film and they're trying to cater too much to the lomography fad. I'm not into lomography. I'm into film photography.

    But I will give it a chance. I've been following the Impossible Project for a while. Right now, I'm short on money and I'm also going through some rough times in my personal life. I'll look for an SX-70 and give it a try though. I just hope the Impossible Project improves the film and realizes that not everyone who likes instant film is into lomography.

  7. #37
    skyrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Arlington, TX
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    305
    Images
    1
    Glad I didn't buy any of this first batch. I've had better results w/3 yr old 600 from eBay.

  8. #38
    Ektagraphic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southeastern Massachusetts
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,694
    Images
    23
    Talk to the Impossible USA. The woman there is so awesome. She has explaned to me that there are much better things to come and to keep my hopes up especially for the 600 film.
    Helping to save analog photography one exposure at a time

  9. #39
    Chazzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    South Bend, IN, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,838
    Images
    5
    I must say, some photographers have learned how to treat this film and are getting interesting results. Have a look at what our own Akki14 has done, or look at the work on Flickr.
    Charles Hohenstein

  10. #40
    Ken Nadvornick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Monroe, WA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,050
    Images
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Ektagraphic View Post
    Talk to the Impossible USA. The woman there is so awesome. She has explaned to me that there are much better things to come and to keep my hopes up especially for the 600 film.
    Yes, patience is a virtue - albeit not one often in evidence.

    I suspect things will improve dramatically over time. These guys had to show something. And given the enormity of their task - and their noteworthy willingness to take it on - what they showed seems to demonstrate promise. They just didn't have the luxury of working out all of the problems behind closed doors while waiting to unveil the perfect final results.

    It is indeed a new world in analog Photography. And Impossible's efforts are part of that new world.

    I agree with Chazzy. Take a look at Akki14's initial efforts. They're very good. At least I think so.

    We have on APUG an entire group who regularly post tonally-soft, dreamy landscapes and portraits created using more traditional materials usually associated with razor-sharp, significant-contrast images. These efforts are consistently praised for their minimalist vision and beauty.

    At the moment, the Impossible films fall into a similar rendition category. Let's be patient and see how they evolve down the road.

    Ken
    "Hate is an adolescent term used to stop discussion with people you disagree with. You can do better than that."
    —'blanksy', December 13, 2013



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin