Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,524   Posts: 1,543,856   Online: 864
      
Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 96
  1. #51
    Akki14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,873
    Images
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Ektagraphic View Post
    Have you even shot the film?
    That's the problem with 90% of the people complaining on this thread. Their puffed up chests and posturing say... oh it's not good enough for me.

    But look at all the other alternative processes people do out there. Look at all the different specialist films! Let's complain about ortho litho film, it's slow and its tonal range is horribly restricted! Pan50 is soo slow, I can't take pictures of my friends at night with it! Alternative hand-coated processes are so grainy due to the paper swelling and drying and the texture of the paper! and, dear lord, if I see another Lonely Tree In A Field or On A Hill shot, I'll hurt myself :rolleyes:

    You know what? I can perfectly describe the film. Instant lith printing. An absolutely pain in the butt, perfectionist process that still results in not-quite-100%-predictable results which a few have been able to tame into beautiful photographs.

    And yes they were starting from scratch, so there will be problems to work out. Newbies to emulsion making don't pour perfect plates or make perfect film the first time around either (or within the first few tries, they've not quite had a full year to sort out the full R&D and machinery). And yes, the cynic in me thinks this is the perfect way to raise capital but then that can only be a good thing as they'll now have something to improve upon.
    ~Heather
    oooh shiny!
    http://www.stargazy.org/

  2. #52

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by Akki14 View Post
    That's the problem with 90% of the people complaining on this thread. Their puffed up chests and posturing say... oh it's not good enough for me.
    And you and your sample images are to blame.

    Quote Originally Posted by Akki14 View Post
    But look at all the other alternative processes people do out there. Look at all the different specialist films! [...]
    We could. But doesn't that force the conclusion upon us that the IP did an exceptionally bad job managing expectations?
    I never heard them say they were going to create a new "alternative process". Instead, they said they were going to recreate Polaroid.

  3. #53

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by Ektagraphic View Post
    They haven't delivered? They are still working on [...]
    There you go: they set a date, and haven't delivered.
    Yet? Who knows?

  4. #54
    Ken Nadvornick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Monroe, WA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,286
    Images
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Q.G. View Post
    Instead, they said they were going to recreate Polaroid.
    That is, unfortunately, a demonstrably incorrect assertion. And perhaps part of the reason for your unhappiness with Impossible's initial offering?

    From their Mission Statement:

    "The Impossible mission is NOT to re-build Polaroid Integral film but (with the help of strategic partners) to develop a new product with new characteristics, consisting of new optimised components, produced with a streamlined modern setup. An innovative and fresh analog material, sold under a new brand name that perfectly will match the global re-positioning of Integral Films."

    (Upper case emphasis is part of the original statement.)

    Ken
    Last edited by Ken Nadvornick; 04-14-2010 at 01:56 AM. Click to view previous post history.
    "They are the proof that something was there and no longer is. Like a stain. And the stillness of them is boggling. You can turn away but when you come back they’ll still be there looking at you."

    — Diane Arbus, March 15, 1971, in response to a request for a brief statement about photographs

  5. #55

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,544
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Nadvornick View Post
    That is, unfortunately, a demonstrably incorrect assertion. And perhaps part of the reason for your unhappiness with Impossible's initial offering?

    From their Mission Statement:

    "The Impossible mission is NOT to re-build Polaroid Integral film but (with the help of strategic partners) to develop a new product with new characteristics, consisting of new optimised components, produced with a streamlined modern setup. An innovative and fresh analog material, sold under a new brand name that perfectly will match the global re-positioning of Integral Films."

    Ken
    That was a part I, also, hadn't read (my omission, but I've not previously had any
    particular interest in using Polaroid).

    I guess anyone expecting a replica or replacement film just to resurrect their old "instant snapshot" cameras from the attic is likely to be disappointed, but I can see now that, as Akki infers above, that this may hopefully progress successfully as a new "alternative process" of interest mainly to enthusiasts.
    Last edited by railwayman3; 04-14-2010 at 03:26 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  6. #56
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,599
    Not aiming at recreating Polaroid does not neccessarily mean technical inferiority. Yes, I admit it is hard in this case to establish the scale to measure technical grade.

    But, they stated to "change the world of photography" with their new film. And this CAN be discussed.

  7. #57

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    44
    I do have to cut Impossible Project some slack about one thing...they have said from the very beginning that the film would NOT be the same as Polaroid films. They said it would be different. They said they would make films that were compatible with SX-70 and Polaroid 600 but it wouldn't be the same.

    I really do want to give them a chance and I want to try the film. When they come out with a 600 film, I definitely will buy a couple of cartridges just out of curiosity. It's just that I'm having doubts, and I have to be honest that it seems like it's just too expensive. Especially considering how finicky everyone is saying the film is. I mean really, if you only get 8 pictures per cartridge, with a film that is very finicky and inconsistent, and each cartridge costs over $20 each...I just don't know what to think about that.

    I also can't really say I like IP's marketing scheme. No offense to anyone here, but one of my pet peeves is how they feel like they have to insert the catchy hipster "analog" term every chance they get...as in how they have "analog instant film" all over their website. What, as opposed to "digital film" ?? And really, since when do we have to call film "analog", anyway? What's wrong with just saying FILM?

    I mean, like I said...Fuji still makes great instant peel-apart film and you sure don't see them plastering "analog instant film" all over their products.

    I'm just saying.
    Last edited by gatewaycityca; 04-14-2010 at 05:57 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  8. #58
    Akki14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,873
    Images
    210
    I think it has changed the world of instant photography. This is a totally different product. And obviously it's pissing off quite a bit of people and any publicity is good publicity. And quite frankly it mostly seems to piss off those who would never and have never shot polaroid anyway, so what's the problem? It's like going into a minox forum and bitching about massively huge grain on huge enlargements. Why don't you all shoot large format, huh?

    For the record, my keeper rate out of a pack of 8 is 6-7 shots, usually one or two is down to slight exposure adjustments, nothing else.

    Appropriately for the "analog film" rant, I see below my reply box an APUG advert for some place saying... JustFilm. All Analog ... All The Time. Are they hipsters then? Maybe we should go ask them.
    ~Heather
    oooh shiny!
    http://www.stargazy.org/

  9. #59
    kraker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands (south)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,183
    Images
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Akki14 View Post
    I think it has changed the world of instant photography. (...)
    Very well said, Heather. All of it.

    I still have some 6(?) packs of Polaroid 600 left, and there, the world of instant photography is also changing. Time and temperature have their influence, and it's always a surprise to see how the colours turn out in the next pack.

    I really appreciate what Impossible is doing, and it's great to see this happening. I'm sure they're still making changes to the products, and I think it is just great that we can give them a try already. We don't have to wait until it's all 100% (and even then, when is it 100%? If it is exactly the same as the Polaroid product? Now, THAT is boring!) This is the perfect time to experiment.

    When their 600 film comes out, I'll be sure to buy a few packs, even if I still have Polaroid 600 in stock.

    shuttr.net
    -- A sinister little midget with a bucket and a mop / Where the blood goes down the drain --

  10. #60
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,015
    Images
    65
    It still reminds me of the old child's tale "The Emperors New Clothes"!

    PE



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin