Dear ROL, thank you for your compliments and the correction, I did not know that overmatting specifically referred to the widow overlapping a portion of the image—I thought the term described every sort of a window mat placed over the mounted picture. Let me correct the article after I had a chance to review the text you referenced. Many thanks for spotting that.
PS. I've read your own in-depth article. Is it OK if I link to it, and if I mention your comment?
Last edited by Rafal Lukawiecki; 10-06-2012 at 10:56 AM. Click to view previous post history.
Dear ROL, I was looking up the term "overmat", and I think that, perhaps, I did not fully understand your point, in which case, my apologies. I realise that this term is something that may have changed meaning a good few times, and it may be regional, however AA's The Print (2000 printing, page 156) uses the name "overmat" to describe a bevelled-cut window that is placed over the print with a space around the edges of the print—the same approach, indeed, to the one you have described in your excellent article, using just slightly different terminology. 2nd edition of Way Beyond Monochrome (pages 70–71) goes further, to say that the only difference between an "overmat" for a dry-mounted vs corner-mounted print lies in the size of the opening which either does not or does overlap the edges of the print.
Originally Posted by ROL
On the other hand, the verb "to overmat" is not as popular, it seems. WBM, Kistler, and Hyder, all refer to the creation and assembly of the overmat simply as "matting", but Adams still calls it "overmatting". My Shorter Oxford does not list a verb "to overmat" at all, but even its many descriptions of "to mat" only vaguely refer to what we mean by this term... In all cases, I fully respect your use of the term, and I am thankful for your feedback. I will clarify the captions to the photos in my article.
Rafal, read the article by Jon Goodman at this URL: http://www.photogravure.com/resources/texts.html
Imagine someone spending years just to make a few good prints, or even with a developed technique took months just to make the plates for four prints - all for the beauty of the print. The finishing statement is just so profound:
"The question is not about difficulty, but about beauty. For me ink and paper carry an aura and allure that transcend all of the difficulties and frustrations of the journey".
We have it easy making silver gelatin prints these days, perhaps too easy?
"Make good art!"
- Neil Gaiman
"...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera".
- Yousuf Karsh
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit".
Thomas, that you, very much, for sharing the article. It is inspiring to read about the sheer determination driven by a love of an artistic process. It does make up for the moments when I wonder why I keep on pursuing an increasingly old-fashioned, and a somewhat impractical process. However, I have to agree, that in the end it is all about that finished tangible item. It does have an aura, even if my route to it is so much easier than Jon Goodman's. I bet he's a perfectionist...
great article !
fun to read too
looking forward to the next one -
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
Yes, AA uses the term "overmatting" to describe both types of window treatments, only in the sense that he doesn't specifically mention other print mounting techniques other than dry mounting (on the page you reference). I would only suggest that the term may have undergone some degree of evolution, and that using one or the other is only important insofar as those who are interested in your work are able to distinguish how your prints are actually presented.
For me, overmatting speaks specifically to the window covering the actual printing paper, a method which normally accompanies hinge or other non permanent mounting schemes. The physical attribute of such is that the window overmat assists in holding (the edges of) the otherwise loose print to its back or mount board. Many photographers do this successfully on relatively small (<=20"x24") papers. By printing with an adequate margin, the print may be signed right on the (white) paper margin with room to be reasonably held down by the overmat.
Dry mounting (as you know) is a mostly permanent mounting technique, decidedly not appreciated by all, which results in a smooth professional look, when done well. The print does not need to be held down and so may be separated entirely from its window as in a portfolio, without fear of catching a corner or side of a loosely attached print. The print may be "floated" (the other term) within and entirely separate from the its window.
The aesthetic and artistic value of floating a window over a suitable dry mount, as opposed to overmatting, so defined, is that the artist decides the ultimate frame of the printed photograph, not a framer or curator, who must cover the margins of a print with a window to display it once the window (if it ever existed) becomes separated from it. There is an unfortunate trend among museum curators (who prefer "loose" prints) to overmat vintage photographs into the image area, which does not honor the vision of the artist. I see this all the time at the Getty (LA), where some way of presenting loose historic prints must be devised. But last year I also observed it on a dry mounted Adams print, cutting into the actual image area. I don't believe the artist would have been at all pleased with the treatment of his work of art.
Of course you may link to my site.
Last edited by ROL; 10-12-2012 at 09:29 PM. Click to view previous post history.