Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,745   Posts: 1,515,653   Online: 757
      
Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 56789101112 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 114
  1. #101
    smieglitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,863
    Images
    97
    Svend,

    I was fortunate to see several Rembrandts last summer at the National Gallery in Washington and share your reverence.

    Thanks for expressing the sentiment so very well.

    Joe

  2. #102
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by bjorke View Post
    I'd give credit for that to R. Mutt.
    I wouldn't, and for this reason - although Duchamp obviously opened the door to the exhibition of ready-made objects as art, his use of the "R. Mutt" signature left in a sense a loophole for people to dismiss his "work" as a joke if they felt so inclined. Furthermore, Duchamp's work has had the serious consequence (possibly unintended) of inviting consideration of industrial products as art (cars by Bugatti, Harvey Earl, Lamborghini, etc., countless other products, the list is endless), whereas Warhol was straight-ahead 100% shamelessly and unflinchingly in the trash business!

    Regards,

    David
    Last edited by David H. Bebbington; 06-11-2007 at 02:20 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  3. #103
    jstraw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Topeka, Kansas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,703
    Images
    42
    Harley Earl.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. In velit arcu, consequat at, interdum sit amet, consequat in, quam.

  4. #104
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,159
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    432
    And while Harley Earl was the chief of GM's Art and Color department (he actually coined the department name), he had no formal art or design training himself - most of the designs he was credited with were more a result of his being able to communicate (read yell at until they got it right) a concept to the designers who worked for him - most famously "longer, lower, wider". Great car designers from the classic age included Gordon Beuhrig, Raymond Loewy, and later at GM, Bill Mitchell, who actually did pen designs himself.

  5. #105
    gr82bart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Culver City, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,224
    Images
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by copake_ham View Post
    Now, Art, I'll try to remember your real Avatar name if you remember to put the "n" in "munch"!
    Damn auto-spell check! More slippery than the buttery yellow liquid they pour over the popcorn. Anyway, 98k posts to go and this site will hit the big leagues.

    Regards, Art.
    Visit my website at www.ArtLiem.com
    or my online portfolios at APUG and ModelMayhem

  6. #106
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by jstraw View Post
    Harley Earl.
    Ok, now we've sorted the typo out, any feelings about Warhol, Duchamp, or the world in general?

  7. #107
    jstraw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Topeka, Kansas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,703
    Images
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by David H. Bebbington View Post
    Ok, now we've sorted the typo out, any feelings about Warhol, Duchamp, or the world in general?
    Nope.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. In velit arcu, consequat at, interdum sit amet, consequat in, quam.

  8. #108
    CPorter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    West KY
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,662
    Images
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by Donald Miller View Post
    What about photography for that matter is it truly artistic? Is most of what I produce and observe in photography simply illustration? Is the illustrative output of any value to either myself or to a prospective viewer? What defines artistic output?
    This reminds me of how there are such different approaches to photography, such as with AA vs. Minor White. They both firmly believed in photography as an art form and that they were truly being "artistic" in their own practice of it, but there could not have been a greater difference in there own approaches to the image on the ground glass and thus to the image on the paper.

    "What defines artistic output"

    *To white, I think the answer was found in the "thoughts, feelings, and reactions of the artist to his subject and his image." (quote: AA, autobiography)

    *In contrast to Adams, "When a photograph is made, I consider it an accomplished fact. Then, I go on with the next creative effort. To brood over something irrevocably done is a waste of time"..............."If something moves me, I do not question what it is or why; I am content to be moved."

    IMO, Donald, your photographs are what you believe them to be (I've seen some damn nice ones). Ilustration or Art? I just don't think words can answer that question, but we all probably agree that the photograph itself is supposed to.

    But I do think that the effort in itself is so entirely a personal effort, that the question is clearly aswered, at least in our minds, when you look at that dried print in the room light and it sings to you (I wish this happened more for me ). At that point, at least for me, the question of "artistic output" becomes moot, or of no practical consequence. It is what I want it to be and others can make up there own mind.

    Just my thoughts.

    Chuck

  9. #109
    Maris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Noosa, Queensland, Australia.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    706
    If someone is sufficiently in control of a picture making medium, photography say, so that the picture comes out the way they want then the picture is a map of those wants; a mind map; thought made visible. To look at such a picture is to be in the presence of art.

    Because modern technology enables pictures to be generated by people who don't care very much, don't try very hard, don't have a particular end point in mind, but hope maybe something will eventuate, just looking at a picture is not enough. One has to study the putative artist as well.

    Should it turn out that the "artist" didn't bother putting the picture through their own mind I won't bother putting it through mine either.
    Photography, the word itself, invented and defined by its author Sir John.F.W.Herschel, 14 March 1839 at the Royal Society, Somerset House, London. Quote "...Photography or the application of the Chemical rays of light to the purpose of pictorial representation,..". unquote.

  10. #110
    darinwc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,037
    Images
    157
    "Because modern technology enables pictures to be generated by people who don't care very much, don't try very hard, don't have a particular end point in mind, but hope maybe something will eventuate, just looking at a picture is not enough. One has to study the putative artist as well."

    And how would one know the difference as a viewer of said photographs? How would the viewer know if the composition was meticulously composed or just a randomly timed event?

Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 56789101112 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin