Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,674   Posts: 1,481,898   Online: 1144
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,985
    Images
    279

    Kertesz and Composition

    I had the opportunity to view a fair amount of Andre Kertesz prints in the flesh the other day, and I was astounded by all of them. There are compositional elements that are shared between prints, and that after some comparisons and study looked as if they were obvious to me. Note, I am not an expert by any means, and I could well have seen what I wanted to see.

    However, one of the prints, which I'm sure a lot of you have seen, 'The Tulip', has an optical illusion baked into it. I was wondering if either of you had any information on how this was actually done. I believe he used distorting mirrors, and I know there are at least two exposures because there is a 'shadow' of the blossom in the actual print, don't know if it's visible in the attachment or not.

    Thankful for some thoughts and insight on this.

    - Thomas
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails kertesz_tulip.jpg  

  2. #2
    Ian Leake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,355
    Images
    48
    Unfortunately I don't have a print of this photo in a book so I have to go on the attachment. I'm not sure, but think I can see a shadow of the flower just above it.

    Assuming this is correct (not just my dodgy eyes), I would guess that this is a photo taken of a distorting mirror (so we're seeing a reflection), and that it was a long exposure during which the tulip sagged a bit (so we see a bit of before, but mostly after). A better print may disprove this theory though.

  3. #3
    tony lockerbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bega N.S.W. Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,254
    Images
    366
    Kertesz used mirrors a lot for his distortion photos, all started with the underwater swimmer, probably the first photo taken with the subject being distorted. Of course this wasn't a mirror, just the natural affect of the water. I always assumed that "Tulips" was a reflection in a mirror.
    Tony

  4. #4
    SuzanneR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,715
    Images
    135
    Yes... I think it's a reflection in a distorted mirror. Didn't he also use the distorted mirror for several nude figure studies as well?

    This example is lovely, btw, thanks for reminding me!

  5. #5
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,985
    Images
    279
    Thanks for chiming in. I can say that having seen the real prints they are absolutely stunning. This one just shines. I never thought about it being a super long exposure, therefore the flower 'sagging' making it look like a multiple exposure. Good point!
    Suzanne, he did do some figure studies using this technique as well, unfortunately the MIA didn't have any of those prints, however.
    As an aside, the museum just received a large gift (400 prints) from a collector in North Dakota, some of which are going up on exhibit in July.
    Check out http://www.artsmia.org if you live in the area. The exhibit is free.
    - Thomas

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    174
    Didn't he also use the distorted mirror for several nude figure studies as well?

    Yes. In the late 20s or 30s. Caught quite a lot of flack for it too, if I remember correctly. "Pornographic," I think.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin