Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,546   Posts: 1,572,968   Online: 1028
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Akki14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,873
    Images
    210

    Problem print - help please

    Hello all,

    I'm having problems liking this photograph and I don't know why. I can't retake it because the baby in the picture is now about 5 or 6 years old (it's my niece/niece-in-law - I'm a bad auntie for not remembering exactly how old she is now :rolleyes: )
    So I have a scan of a print i did of this image about 5 years ago. I probably wasn't so good at printing then. However I do like the lighter baby head in the older print because then you don't get the icky baby rash showing up on her head.
    So basically what I did for this recent print is print a grade darker (grade 3 on ilford multigrade VC RC) and burn in that top left corner because I thought it was too distractingly bright (and I'm kind of surprised there's that much information in the film from the burning in too, I thought that was what's known as a blown highlight).
    I keep flipping between them and trying to decide if I like the darker print I did today or not.

    PS yes I know there's a white dot on the arm i don't know what it is, I'm just going to use my spotone to carefully spot it out. I'm more concentrating on the printing bit at the moment.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails abby.jpg   abby-fixedcorner1.jpg  
    ~Heather
    oooh shiny!
    http://www.stargazy.org/

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    587
    You could try completely removing the distracting highlight in the top corner by using a snoot on the end of a pen torch. This would allow you to play the torchlight on this area to take it completely black.
    The lighter version seems better to me, but have you tried to print it a little lighter but use a G2 or 2.5? But ensure you keep a full black somewhere.
    Regards,
    John.

  3. #3
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,440
    Images
    20
    I prefer the darker version, and the rash doesn't bother me (but then again, I don't have the rash.

    If you wanted to keep the baby light, you print it lighter and go up half a grade to keep the blacks where they are.

    I'm not a big fan of diffusion under the enlarging lens, but if the rash really bothers you (not that I'm implying that you have the rash), you could try a slight amount of diffusion to smooth that out.

    About that top corner, you could also crop it out. I think it would look good with a tighter crop, maybe as a square, as long as the image can tolerate it at whatever enlargement factor you have planned.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  4. #4
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,784
    Here's a suggestion you would only find on Apug. It may work pretty well with this negative, so if you are up for a bit of an adventure, read on.

    Print a full sheet striped by 1/2 stop increment test exposure using your Grade 5 filter, and a piece of opaque mat board. Never mind the lack of highlights, just find the exposure that puts your blackest blacks where you want them..

    Expose a full sheet at that exposure. Then without moving the paper make another striped test print using your 00. Somewhere in this print the baby will be perfect.

    Make a print, exposing the paper with the exposures you have determined using both filter grades.
    (you will be exposing the paper twice, once with the 5 and once with the 00). Burn in the corner when you print the soft exposure. Dry it down, check it out, and alter future exposures to taste.
    Last edited by JBrunner; 11-09-2007 at 01:56 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: Tryng to be less cryptic.

  5. #5
    Akki14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,873
    Images
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb View Post
    I prefer the darker version, and the rash doesn't bother me (but then again, I don't have the rash.

    If you wanted to keep the baby light, you print it lighter and go up half a grade to keep the blacks where they are.

    I'm not a big fan of diffusion under the enlarging lens, but if the rash really bothers you (not that I'm implying that you have the rash), you could try a slight amount of diffusion to smooth that out.

    About that top corner, you could also crop it out. I think it would look good with a tighter crop, maybe as a square, as long as the image can tolerate it at whatever enlargement factor you have planned.
    I love APUG, one reply says they like the lighter one, the other the dark and the third says something I don't understand

    I was considering cropping or *gasp* vignetting (black) (oh no! babies and vignetting! I'll be doing Sears portrait studio photography next!) but then someone's hand is in the left bottom corner which makes cropping a little difficult without having a strange, mysterious finger in shot :rolleyes: I might play with cropping a bit more before I go the coward's route of vignetting. I think the babyheadrash is more visible in the actual print but I guess that's probably something parents would go Aw cute at (and the kid would go EW!).
    I might try fresher developer too, I think my working solution might be finally going off after umpteen prints and a few sheet films

    Thanks for the ideas. Back to the darkroom...
    ~Heather
    oooh shiny!
    http://www.stargazy.org/

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,512
    Images
    4
    Lots of good suggestions already. I think you do need crop out most of the area above the head. About 3/4ths of that area cropped out makes for a much stonger composition IMHO.
    "Fundamentally I think we need to rediscover a non-ironic world"
    Robert Adams

  7. #7
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,412
    Why not crop the left side, removing both the hand and the white light. That would improve the composition and make printing easier.

    Steve
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  8. #8
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,784
    Quote Originally Posted by Akki14 View Post
    I was considering cropping or *gasp* vignetting (black) (oh no! babies and vignetting! I'll be doing Sears portrait studio photography next!)
    I like the composition, the coochie coochie hand says allot. I think it would be a shame to crop it.

    Nothing wrong with a good vignette. It is B&W after all, I don't think it will scream portrait mill.

  9. #9
    Akki14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,873
    Images
    210
    New crop, took longer to wait for it to dry than to make it. Fresh chemicals, just raised the enlarger head a bit and got husband to give opinion and shifted it around until it was more "rule of thirds" and all. And still kept the hand.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails abby-newcrop1.jpg  
    ~Heather
    oooh shiny!
    http://www.stargazy.org/

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    587
    Well done !
    I think we all assumed, probably wrongly, that you were using fresh materials.
    Keep at it.
    Regards,
    John.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin