Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,524   Posts: 1,543,818   Online: 787
      
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    33
    Images
    30

    DD-X: what is the minimum amount per film?

    The fact sheet for DD-X gives the following information: "Used at 1+4 for one shot processing DD-X will develop 16 135/36 films." Does this mean that a minimum of 62.5 ml of DD-X is required to develop one roll of film, regardless of the dilution used? (1000 ml divided by 16 rolls yields 62.5 ml)

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,301
    See page 8 and 9 for extending tank times for dilution of 1+4, http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/...7124733149.pdf
    Bob

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    33
    Images
    30
    Pages 8-9 concern re-using DD-X rather than using it as a one-shot developer. I want to use DD-X as a one-shot.

    I used to believe that D-76 at 1:1 meant that you could develop two rolls of 35 mm film in a 16-oz tank using 8 oz of stock solution diluted in 8 oz of water. This is not the case, according to the fact sheet for D-76: "You can develop one 135-3 roll (80 square inches) in 473 mL (16 ounces) or two rolls together in 946 mL (one quart) of diluted developer."

    A minimum of 8 oz of D-76 stock solution is required to develop a roll of film, whether you use D-76 straight or diluted 1:1.

    Could this also be the case with DD-X, since the fact sheet clearly states that a litre will develop 16 rolls?

  4. #4
    6x7
    6x7 is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    United States
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    10
    The minimum amount of developer depends on your tank and the number of rolls being developed. In my Paterson Universal, it is roughly 60mL of developer (tank capacity is 290mL per roll of 35mm, but I round up to 300mL for easier measuring) to 240mL of water (1:4) for a single roll of 35mm.

    Doing it this way, I can indeed develop 16 rolls of 35mm from a 1L bottle of DD-X.
    Last edited by 6x7; 03-09-2012 at 10:29 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,088
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Ridyard View Post
    The fact sheet for DD-X gives the following information: "Used at 1+4 for one shot processing DD-X will develop 16 135/36 films." Does this mean that a minimum of 62.5 ml of DD-X is required to develop one roll of film, regardless of the dilution used? (1000 ml divided by 16 rolls yields 62.5 ml)
    Yes, for one-shot use, that's the correct minimum quantity of concentrate per 80 square inches of film.

    There are many who will report that they use less and doing so "works fine." If you too wish to gamble, follow their example. Only by using the minimum quantity of concentrate can you absolutely count on repeatable results regardless of what the scenes you photograph exhibit in terms of average brightness. Using less developer means that, depending on scene makeup, you might under develop or you might not.

    Some other developers' minimums (concentrate or, for powder developers, stock solution) are:

    Xtol - 100 ml

    D-76 / ID-11 / Perceptol: 250 ml

    Rodinal - 10 ml

    HC-110 / Ilfotec HC - 6 ml

    Shoot craps or be confident; the choice is yours.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,301
    Even if there is enough "developer" in 30 ml of stock solution, diluting it to weaker than 1+4 reduces the activity of the solution. So you have to use enough stock to make a 1+4 mix to cover the reel in the tank. The pages I mentioned indicate there is an excess of developer as extending the times for multiple rolls indicates. The one shot use is for optimum image quality and consistency as the document indicates. BTW, active developing agent consumption during processing depends on the amount of exposed silver in the roll. A roll of film exposed to room light will likely exhaust a tank full, an unexposed roll not so much.
    Bob

  7. #7
    Aron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Hungary
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    251
    A die-hard Rodinal user would never say 10 ml. I've got a 500 ml bottle in front of me (AgfaPhoto Rodinal) and on the box it says:

    "Working capacity: For 30 to 80 rolls of 35 mm films with 36 exposures depending on dilution."

    500/80=6,25 ml. Usually they state 7 ml is the official, but 5 ml works just fine.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    33
    Images
    30
    I used to use 5 ml of Rodinal at 1:50 to process one roll of Tri-X and it worked fine.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,088
    Quote Originally Posted by Sal Santamaura View Post
    ...There are many who will report that they use less and doing so "works fine." If you too wish to gamble, follow their example....Shoot craps or be confident; the choice is yours.
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Ridyard View Post
    I used to use 5 ml of Rodinal at 1:50 to process one roll of Tri-X and it worked fine.
    OK, follow "their" (your own) advice, shoot craps and be happy.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,962
    There are users who claim good consistent results at 1+9. It requires longer times of course and Harman doesn't list 1+9 times. Do a search here and you'll find info. Try the Massive Development Chart. It lists 1+9 times if I recall but of course they are simply user times and not "official manufacturer times

    pentaxuser

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin