Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,500   Posts: 1,543,293   Online: 968
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    brian steinberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    2,331
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    100
    I've used both and HP5 is by far my favorite. I went through a phase where I thought Delta was better, but then found myself missing HP5. HP5 has better tonality, nicer grain (though more grain), and sharper. Plus, it pushes better. I think Delta 100 is a closer rival to FP4 than Delta 400 is to HP5.

  2. #12
    EASmithV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,874
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images
    122
    I actually prefer Delta 400 over HP5+

    Why? Because HP5+ is so close to Tri-X, that I'd rather use Tri-X for those things.

    However, as Delta 400 is significantly different than either, I like it better than the HP5+ i'd rather use tri-x for.

    I do like the look...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6790863965_fca240d033_z.jpg 
Views:	105 
Size:	164.0 KB 
ID:	47837

    Delta 400 in Rodinal 1:100 on Ilford MGIV RC
    www.EASmithV.com

    "The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera."— Dorothea Lange
    http://www.flickr.com/easmithv/
    RIP Kodachrome

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6
    Simon R Galley,

    I received the package in the mail today with the reading. Thank you very very much. I really appreciate you going above and beyond to teach me the ropes. I think I've learned a lot more about film from the information your provided.

    I decided when making prints out of my first Delta Professional roll that HP5+ suits my taste better. I brought the other two rolls back to the local store I bought them from and exchanged them for HP5+.

    Thanks again everyone! I think I'm going to like this forum.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Horsham, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    751
    I understand that HP5 is probably the better choice right now, but don't discount Delta 400. I'm not sure what developing time you used, but if you used the same time as for HP5, your negative would have come out underdeveloped, which results in a loss of contrast and shadow detail. When you decide to develop on your own, try Delta again, and develop for the proper time.

    You may not like it, but I think you should at least give the film a fair shake.
    "Panic not my child, the Great Yellow Father has your hand"--Larry Dressler

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Wilmington, Delaware
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    49
    T-grain films, such as Delta and Tmax, when used in conjunction with developers like Tmax developer, have much shorter developing times then HP5 or TriX. A developing time of 7 - 8 minutes makes it much easier to finish a roll of film in a single class period. With many developers HP5 and the like can take 13 -15 minutes. This is one of the major reasons high school photo teachers favor Delta and Tmax.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin