Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,556   Posts: 1,545,099   Online: 1026
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    rhmimac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    227
    Images
    11

    SFX 200 developing question

    I don't seem to find any data on developing SFX 200 shot @ EI 100 in DDX or ilfosol 3.

    Which of both dev's will suit this exposure best?

    No filter used, just used it as a plain B&W film.

    Could anyone give me a hint?

    Thanks?

    rhmimac

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Peak District, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    55
    I use same dev times as FP4. Works fine for me. I expose for IR but can't see why same logic wouldn't work using it as downrated normal film. Dave

  3. #3
    rhmimac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    227
    Images
    11
    Thanks Dave, I get 4 min's for 1+9 ilfosol3 100ASA and 7 min's for 1+14 at 20°C

    rhmimac

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Peak District, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    55
    That's great. I thought it should work. Personally, I would avoid the 1+14 dilution unless you want grain like golf balls. It will be quite an extreme effect with SFX! Dave

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    50
    SFX 200 in Ilford ID11 stock, (10 min, agit.20-30 sec. in start).Just great results
    Franol



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin