Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,712   Posts: 1,482,997   Online: 859
      
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 56
  1. #41
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,140
    Images
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Schrager View Post
    nathan...ilford does the film run once a year in ANY size even one box!!
    This is wrong, they have minimum orders of 20+ orders and if that isn't met they don't do that size. But at least they give the option.


    ~Stone | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller

  2. #42
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,140
    Images
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by polyglot View Post
    Are you planning on cutting any to 70mm? If I could get it at about the same price as Macodirect is selling the Rollei then that would be great.
    I second this question, 70mm? Double Perforated and NON-perforated? also, 127 format with spools and backing paper?

    Any of that possible?


    ~Stone | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller

  3. #43
    ADOX Fotoimpex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Berlin
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    361
    127 format with spools and backing paper?
    If we had spools we would make 127 film :-(

    70mm: not planned.

  4. #44
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,140
    Images
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by ADOX Fotoimpex View Post
    If we had spools we would make 127 film :-(

    70mm: not planned.
    What about making uncut 46mm spools like Ilford does? We can hand roll.

    OR better would be to roll it WITH backing paper as a continuous roll of paper but the emulsion spaced out with notches in the paper where we cut in the dark and can hand roll onto spools without worrying about being off with the emulsion placement and numbers? Possible?

    Like this...



    ~Stone | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller

  5. #45
    polyglot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,953
    Images
    12
    Was it a single coating run on a single thickness? Is that the reason that 120 will be coming later; are you planning a second batch on a thinner support?

    If it was a single thickness base, how thick is it? About 0.007" would be nice, but if it's 0.004" or thinner like the Rollei IR sheets, they're incredibly annoying to handle.

  6. #46
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,446
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post
    What about making uncut 46mm spools like Ilford does? We can hand roll.

    OR better would be to roll it WITH backing paper as a continuous roll of paper but the emulsion spaced out with notches in the paper where we cut in the dark and can hand roll onto spools without worrying about being off with the emulsion placement and numbers?
    That would need new machinery.


    Another alternative would be cutting 46mm film rolls and 46mm backing paper and selling both rolls as a set.

  7. #47
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,140
    Images
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by AgX View Post
    That would need new machinery.


    Another alternative would be cutting 46mm film rolls and 46mm backing paper and selling both rolls as a set.
    That would be totally awesome!!!


    ~Stone | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller

  8. #48

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    114
    Any pricing info yet?

    Looking forward to try some in 8x10.

  9. #49
    Curt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,510
    Images
    15
    & 11x14!
    Everytime I find a film or paper that I like, they discontinue it. - Paul Strand - Aperture monograph on Strand

  10. #50
    ADOX Fotoimpex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Berlin
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    361
    So many questions...

    OK, sheet flm is on 170 micron support so no flimsyness here.
    35mm and 120 are on 100 micron PET (just like CHS 100 I was).
    The reason for the 120 delay is caused by our large slitter needing to be converted to 61,5mm. Takes some time.
    The small slitter is not fit for film anymore. We only use this for backing paper now.
    46mm would be another adventure. We have no backing paper with the correct numbers printed on.

    Mirko

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin