Discussions: 45,145 | Messages: 608,620 | Members: 29,907 | Online: 252 | Chatroom: 2
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1091 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
626 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
938 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Photographic Aesthetics and Composition > Landscape > The square & the landscape!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2005, 05:40 PM   #21 (permalink)
 
harveyje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 166
Default

Square, vertical, horizontal, panoramic - doesn't it all depend on you, the subject, and/or what you want the image to be in its final form.
__________________
John Harvey
Colorado Springs, CO
harveyje@usa.net
harveyje is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-19-2005, 05:55 PM   #22 (permalink)
 
bobfowler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey, Land of the Living Dead
Posts: 1,438
Default

I can go either way on the crop/no-crop issue. If I see something in the viewfinder and like the composition square, I'll shoot with the intent of a square print. If I see some extra on the top/bottom/sides that really doesn't need to be there, I'll crop. I love working square though, it's so much more comfortable than tilting a big-assed camera on its side.
__________________
Bob Fowler
fowler@verizon.net
Some people are like Slinkies. They're really good for nothing, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
bobfowler is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-19-2005, 09:55 PM   #23 (permalink)
 
blansky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wine country in Northern California
Posts: 3,288
Default

I've shot 6x6 professionally for 30 years and have probably printed no more than 2 or 3 square prints.

Michael
__________________
I couldn't think of anything witty to say so I left this blank.
blansky is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-19-2005, 10:50 PM   #24 (permalink)
 
mikewhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 808
Default

Personally, I bought a 6x6 so I could shoot square. I'd rather buy a square camera than crop a rectangle. I think the square format really is a challenge compositionally, especially the landscape. I have always thought of the viewfinder as a space to fill until I have this intuitive reaction that it's 'right'. Which is why I like to print full-frame and in the format of the camera. I concentrate on utilizing the available space in the viewfinder - I don't ignore it - I emphasize it. For 6x6, my eyes were really opened by Harry Callahans' book "Waters Edge" - really masterful use of the 6x6 in the 'landscape'.

-Mike
mikewhi is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-20-2005, 02:49 AM   #25 (permalink)
 
Leon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 1,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harveyje
Square, vertical, horizontal, panoramic - doesn't it all depend on you, the subject, and/or what you want the image to be in its final form.

that's exactly the point John. There is no right or wrong, just what makes sense to you.
__________________
Leon
My Pictures
Podcast
Arena Photographers
Leon is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 04-20-2005, 04:53 AM   #26 (permalink)
 
Baxter Bradford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lymington, South Coast, UK
Posts: 721
Default

I endorse having a look at how well Charlie Waite (www.charliewaite.com) has done with his square landscapes. Primarily working in colour, he also uses B+W. Having bought an SQA on impulse 5 years ago, discovering his books helped me enormously with landscape and in the use of the square format.
My SQA doesn't get out much now, but I do still appreciate good square images. Think of them as a happy halfway house between Portrait and Landscape format!
__________________
Baxter

baxterbradford.com
Baxter Bradford is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-20-2005, 06:43 AM   #27 (permalink)
 
mikeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baxter Bradford
I endorse having a look at how well Charlie Waite (www.charliewaite.com) has done with his square landscapes. Primarily working in colour, he also uses B+W. Having bought an SQA on impulse 5 years ago, discovering his books helped me enormously with landscape and in the use of the square format.
I bought his two landscape books a year or two ago and I've been going back over them recently. Partly because I've been finding the 35mm landscape format too rectangular! I know you don't have tell me -- I'm weird I find I'm often cropping the sides off my negs during enlarging. It's this reason, and the fact that I'd like a bigger neg, that I've just bought a C220. We'll see how I get on over the next few months!

One thing that Charlie Waite seems to advocate a lot in his work is the use of a step ladder to gain some height. Seems like he takes one on many of his shoots. I must admit, I can't see me hiking across the South Shropshire Hills with a step ladder strapped to my back, my tripod is bad enough, plus this new C220 is no featherweight

Mike
mikeg is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-20-2005, 01:29 PM   #28 (permalink)
 
david b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: new mexico
Posts: 3,462
Default

http://www.apug.org/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=6931

A great example....
__________________
.my blog.
david b is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-20-2005, 01:42 PM   #29 (permalink)
 
eagleowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 127
Default I've always admired...

...the photos of Charlie Waite-and having just visited his website,I admire him even more!
I tried to get one of his books a while back,but (just my luck!)it had been deleted!!!
__________________
A common mistake people made when designing something completely foolproof was to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

Computers are incredibly stupid,but they are capable of being incredibly stupid many millions of times a second.

Both said by Doug Adams

Only put off until tomorrow that which you are prepared to die having not done-Pablo Picasso
eagleowl is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-20-2005, 03:06 PM   #30 (permalink)
 
mikeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleowl
...the photos of Charlie Waite-and having just visited his website,I admire him even more!
I tried to get one of his books a while back,but (just my luck!)it had been deleted!!!
The two that I've got are his "The making of landscape photographs" and "Seeing landscapes". The first one was published 1992 and the second 1999. Both seem to still be available on Amazon UK at GBP 9. They're both good books, the second is slightly more modern, better paper etc. They both deal with his thinking behind his photos for example, why he often uses 6x6. Sometimes he has several versions of the same photo taken at different times, slightly different angles etc, and he explains why one "worked" and the other didn't. Also, he's not afraid to crop if he feels the image needs it. Both recommended.

Mike
mikeg is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using