Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 73,067   Posts: 1,611,794   Online: 1115
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28
  1. #11
    MikeSeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Prospect (Louisville), KY, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,062
    Quote Originally Posted by BradS View Post
    ...I understand that the WSJ has gone down hill since News corp took it over....
    Are you a regular reader, or perhaps a subscriber? I have been the former for a long time, the latter for a decade. "I understand that..." conveys that you are neither. If you were, then you'd know that News Corp's purchase of the WSJ was not the apocalyptic victory for the VRWC* portrayed by outlets on the short-wavelength end of the ideological spectrum. The paper remains a staunch proponent of the unarguable virtues of freer trade and markets, smaller government, and individual liberty.

    That aside, simple economics explains the crappy quality of residential real-estate photos. There's no perceived value in excellent images, as houses have sold without them just fine (present situation noted). Why pay extra for Julius Shulman when Digicam Realtor can get the job done for free?


    *Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
    Michael Sebastian
    Website | Blog

  2. #12
    jd callow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,999
    Images
    117
    WSJ has great reporters/journalists so good that you can almost always find a news article that contradicts the never ending stream of rightwing nut case editorials. FWIW if the Journal was a proponent of anything in its news coverage (for example Fox News or the NY Post) it wouldn't be a newspaper, but something else altogether.

    It is in my mind one of the three great US newspapers the others being the Washington Post and the NYT.

    *

  3. #13
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,088
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeSeb View Post
    Are you a regular reader, or perhaps a subscriber? I have been the former for a long time, the latter for a decade. "I understand that..." conveys that you are neither. If you were, then you'd know that News Corp's purchase of the WSJ was not the apocalyptic victory for the VRWC* portrayed by outlets on the short-wavelength end of the ideological spectrum. The paper remains a staunch proponent of the unarguable virtues of freer trade and markets, smaller government, and individual liberty.

    *Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
    Mike, I am sorry you took offense to my opionion of the "new" WSJ.
    For the record, the WSJ is delivered to my house every morning and has been for the past year year or so. Yes, I am a subscriber. Prior to becoming a subscriber, I used to pick it up at a news stand about two or three times a week. I regularily read the first section pretty thoroughly and skim the others.

  4. #14
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,088
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by jd callow View Post
    It is in my mind one of the three great US newspapers the others being the Washington Post and the NYT.

    In my opinion, it used to be...but no longer is.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,390
    Images
    84
    I know a guy who does real estate photography as a company employee. They give him a Canon 350D & he goes to a house & blasts away & then uploads the files to the company where their digital employees do the finishing touches. They correct any convergence, stitch images together etc. The photographer is just one cog in the machine, something I'm still coming to terms with. I think most of us are accustomed to think of the photographer as the sole author of their production but that is less and less the case these days. So yes, real estate, architectural & other genres of commercial photography may be looking worse but it's not a simple case of being able to pin it on the photographer anymore. It's the system, man.

  6. #16
    jd callow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,999
    Images
    117
    The guy you know does essentially what my friend does on his own. He uses a QTVR head for 360 pano's and low end DSLR with attention to colour temp/white balance and PS and QTVR (or similar) for finishing. His work falls well shy of LF view camera, but it is intended for use on the internet or postage stamp reproduction and it is head and shoulders better than the p/s work that is the standard. His work is very formulaic which allows him to produce quantity with reasonably good quantity. I haven't talked to him in four years and he works in Metro Detroit so I wonder how he is doing.

    *

  7. #17
    Rick A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    north central Pa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,449
    Images
    34
    Back in the '70s I made some fairly good money photoing homes for real estate brokers--Now days, they take one of those new fangled POS things that somehow make images in their computer, and leave us out in the cold. We should all lobey our congress men to pass a law to only be able to post pix shot by a competent FILM photographer, and putting them in jail, and a fine for owning a d@#@#$% whatever those things are!
    Rick

  8. #18
    AgX
    AgX is online now

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9,390
    But it is not only real estate photography. I see worse images at the annual national buildings heritage days in the brochures that list all the buildings on show at theses days.
    I find it hard to believe that historians can be so negligent.

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,183
    Images
    107
    On the subject of that article, the image conveys the idea of a messy, unfinished real estate project / deal pretty well.

    http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/im...0416214301.jpg
    The universe is a haunted house. -Coil
    .

  10. #20
    A_M_Johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by walter23 View Post
    On the subject of that article, the image conveys the idea of a messy, unfinished real estate project / deal pretty well.

    http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/im...0416214301.jpg

    That would be the City Center, just down the street from me. This project is supposed to be architectural gold in that the designers of each building are at the top of their fields and well regarded.

    I said here that "City Center is impressive in it’s size and to me, an antiseptic look. All that glass and stone is astonishing. It is clean, polished and sharp. City Center is definitely a testament to the talent and creativity of the designers and builders."

    However, I haven't been back. After the initial awe wore off, I went back to shooting buildings with more character, ones with flaws, that I found more interesting.
    Web Site and Blog Follow me on Twitter Mamiya RB67, several 35MM cameras and an old Voigtlander Bessy that I use as a paperweight

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin