Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,050   Posts: 1,561,124   Online: 751
      
Page 11 of 32 FirstFirst ... 56789101112131415161721 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 315
  1. #101
    Christopher Nisperos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by jstraw View Post
    There is no subject that is iherently excluded from being depicted in art.
    Thus, this classic painting on display at the Musée d'Orsay in Paris:

    http://www.museesdefrance.com/_photo...IA720005_l.jpg

  2. #102
    blansky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Wine country in Northern California
    Posts
    5,029
    What could be more appropriate.

    The origin of life. What wars have been fought over. And a damn good time.

    I spent 9 months there once and enjoyed every minute of it and try to return as often as I can.

    Bravo.



    Michael
    I couldn't think of anything witty to say so I left this blank.

  3. #103
    Christopher Nisperos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by JBrunner View Post
    Utah is a little behind the midwest. In illustration, most recently an Auguste Rodin exhibit was allowed, but the work was draped. I find that attitude far more revolting than pornography.
    I'm speechless. Why bother showing the statues at all? What do they think: Jesus died with a suit on? He was buck-naked on the cross, in spite of all the romanticised paintings.

    And what about respect for the artist's intention (ok, I know that this is the subject of another thread). I mean, we —as photographers— might expect to find our creations someday, somehow manipulated by some evil Photoshopist. If it were done against our will and/or without our knowledge, it would be wrong. But a sculptor —a darned scultor— would surely never expect his work to be shown, "partially covered". It's shameful scandal which reveals a really infantile mentality. "Bleaping" classic sculpture. I'm just amazed.

    Sorry to flame, but it happens whenever I get hot. Back to the subject at hand.

    .
    Last edited by Christopher Nisperos; 11-04-2006 at 12:22 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  4. #104
    Bromo33333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    669
    Quote Originally Posted by Christopher Nisperos View Post
    I'm speechless. Why bother showing the statues at all? What do they think: Jesus died with a suit on? He was buck-naked on the cross, in spite of all the romanticised paintings.
    That means when time travel reaches Utah, the people observing the crucifixion will avert their eyes, not because they are overcome with suffering, but because they are so stunned at the privates hanging there. Or prove all of us wrong, and he DID actually die in his suit.

    And what about respect for the artist's intention (ok, I know that this is the subject of another thread).
    I would say it is more respect for the artist - it would be better to not exhibit it at all.

    But covering it is not good for the museum. The controversy generated would inject a lot of cash in the museum coffers. I would fire the curator and museum director for not generating the required controversy and therefore the traffic, memberships and so on! :rolleyes:

    I think THIS is the incident.
    B & D
    Rochester, NY
    ========================
    Quiquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur

  5. #105
    Bromo33333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    669
    Quote Originally Posted by Bromo33333 View Post
    I think THIS is the incident.
    Well, a little more Googling and THIS is the thing in question.

    The museum is owned by the Church. And apparently they tried to remove 5 statues, and ended up restoring 1 (th Thinker), and John the Baptists had to be covered ...

    Kind of sad, but if it is a LDS Church owned museum, WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? I mean if you are going to exhibit something, you should do it properly.
    B & D
    Rochester, NY
    ========================
    Quiquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur

  6. #106
    Christopher Nisperos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter De Smidt View Post
    How about this: A representation is pornographic if and only if it's main purpose is to cause sexual arousal. A representation is successfully pornographic if and only if it's pornographic, and it succeeds in causing arousal.
    Peter, you have many good points in your post. Just a comment on the above quote. Today's pornography sometimes becomes tomorrow's comedy fodder:

    Like many on this thread, I tend to agree that "pornography" is subjective —not only relative to the individual, but to the times and particular culture.
    For example, in the 1880's the sight of a woman's ankle might have caused sexual arousal. Even today —if I understand correctly— one reason the Muslim
    religion requires their women followers to veil their heads and faces is to prevent arousal in men, too.

    Therefore, what while it's perhaps true that in 1880 a photo of a woman showing her bare ankle might've gotten some gentleman-dandy hot under the collar, obviously by today's mores this kind of "porno" would have little effect, save for foot fetishists. As for Muslim women, I sincerely don't know what effect a "full head portrait" of a woman has on a Muslim guy, but I doubt that Muslims consider such photos as pornographic either. Heresy, perhaps!

    Anyway, your definition has some merit.

    .
    Last edited by Christopher Nisperos; 11-04-2006 at 01:22 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  7. #107
    bjorke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    SF & Surrounding Planet
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,032
    Images
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by JBrunner View Post
    Utah...an Auguste Rodin exhibit was allowed, but the work was draped. I find that attitude far more revolting than pornography.
    BWaaaahahahaha

    I hope someone came by with a wee digital camera and made a couple of "upskirt" shots of it

    "What Would Zeus Do?"
    KBPhotoRantPhotoPermitAPUG flickr Robot

  8. #108
    Aggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    So. Utah
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,925
    Images
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Claire Senft View Post
    I am conflicted by Aggies statement about where a camera should never be put. One reason for this is it conflicts with the advice I have given a couple of digital photographers..a second reason is who is Aggie to tell someone that a camera and axle grease should never be used for recreation?
    Having gone through it twice, you never know if you have a person manning the camera, that knows how to make the correct turns internally. A wrong turn or incomplete turn just makes for a fuzzy image as you want to tap dance on the camera operators head for that mishap.

    The controversy at BYU after reading the above link, seems so ridiculous. I remember (having attended that place) seeing nudes hanging on the walls in the art department in the 70's. Something has changed and not for the good. Granted they were not in anyway considered explicit, but they were nudes. That and the only photograph of a nude at BYU that is shown every single semester is that damn picture taken of me. Seems ironic somehow.
    Non Digital Diva

  9. #109
    Christopher Nisperos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    384
    Re: the classic painting of the vagina by Courbet at the Musée d'Orsay in Paris, Michael Blansky wrote:
    I spent 9 months there once and enjoyed every minute of it and try to return as often as I can.
    Michael
    Michael,

    You spent 9 months at the Musée d'Orsay? Wow. ... OK, just kidding. I get it. In fact —to share a personal note with you—, your comment reminds me of what my mother would sometimes angrily tell her six kids when we misbehaved or joked-around too much: "Sometimes I wish I could just put you kids right back where you came from!". Which would just stoke our stupid humor and bring dumb retorts such as, "Gee, mom, then to eat, we'd have to call for 'womb' service".

    OK, I apologize (especially to mom).

    .
    Last edited by Christopher Nisperos; 11-04-2006 at 03:38 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  10. #110
    Bromo33333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    669
    Quote Originally Posted by bjorke View Post
    BWaaaahahahaha

    I hope someone came by with a wee digital camera and made a couple of "upskirt" shots of it
    Now, now. Perhaps the statue was kilted - and they were trying to elicit the question of what is under a Scotsman's kilt? The digicam would only remove the eternal mystery....
    B & D
    Rochester, NY
    ========================
    Quiquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin