Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 64,090   Posts: 1,347,776   Online: 895
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11
    tomalophicon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT.
    Shooter
    Sub 35mm
    Posts
    1,561
    Images
    24
    Check out Christpher Broadbent's page. I believe he use 120mm-135mm on 4x5.
    He is the greatest still-life photographer in history, in my opinion.
    http://www.christopherbroadbent.pro/...lio/index.html

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,914
    Images
    82
    210 would be my choice.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    714
    yeesh.....now that's a question GUARANTEED to get you every possible answer....

    what you want to do is figure out what magnification you're working with and what distance you want to be when working at that magnification...that will determine the focal length.

    for example--if you need like 5' to get enought distance to put in lights...and you need say 1/4 lifesized, then you want (1+1/(1/4))f = 5' or f=1' = 12" = 305mm. but this will require a bellows draw of (1+1/4)*1' = 1.25' = 15" = 381mm. If you have the bellows draw then go for the 12" lens, if you don't, then you have to do some compromising such as have to work at 4' distance or something like that.

    just use the formulas (1 + 1/M)*f = working distance and (1 + M)*f = bellows draw.

    note--you MAY want to us a shorter lens for more depth of field or a longer lens for less depth of field also--there are a million ways to pick'em.

    just figure out what's important to you looks wise or setupwise, etc....and see what that gets you.

  4. #14
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,080
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by johnielvis View Post
    yeesh.....now that's a question GUARANTEED to get you every possible answer....
    hehe yeah, which is why I listed the full range of focal lengths in my possession
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    57
    135mm and 180mm f/5.6 Nikkor-W. If I ever find the right subject, I'll give the 120mm Nikkor-AM a try.

  6. #16
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,080
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    The 120 AMED is very nice but sometimes it's hard to bring light in with such a short focal length. That said, sometimes I even use the 120 with a diopter.
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,224
    Images
    9
    For me it all depends on what I am looking for in the final image. I generally use a 210, but the 180, 150, and 300 have been used.
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

  8. #18
    JohnArs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Switzerland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,063
    Images
    38
    1. 210mm
    2. 240mm
    3.120mm Macro
    Good light and nice shadows!

    www.artfoto.ch

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:


 
                          

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin