Discussions: 45,147 | Messages: 608,636 | Members: 29,908 | Online: 201 | Chatroom: 2
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1095 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
626 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
938 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Photographic Aesthetics and Composition > Street > Street with a tele

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-04-2008, 04:35 PM   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mabman View Post
I can't find a reference to anything by La Presse, but the case I'm thinking of was about photographer Gilles Duclos in the late 1990's. From the Supreme Court's ruling: "The right to one’s image is an element of the right to privacy under s. 5 of the Quebec Charter. If the purpose of the right to privacy is to protect a sphere of individual autonomy, it must include the ability to control the use made of one’s image. There is an infringement of a person’s right to his or her image and, therefore, fault as soon as the image is published without consent and enables the person to be identified."

So, it's the court's opinion (majority decision) that Quebec's law governing the right to privacy includes the right to "control the use made of one's image" in general, no indication of whether harm was done or not.
Humm I didn't knew about this ruling. However, the La Presse affair is much more recent 2001 or 2002 I can't remember. Well, I think that it is a tricky legislation, since it won't be necessarely applied in all cases. Remember the Robert Doisenau affair in the '90 in France. There was a suit, even if legislation was not clear about the fact. I think we should simply continue to take picture of whatever we want and deal with issues later, and I doubt there will be any in most cases. After all, any criminal or suspect having its picture taken in Quebec by photojournalist could sue... and I don't think its happen very often.

Well, thanks for the precision!

Kris
kristopher_lawrence is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-04-2008, 06:58 PM   #22 (permalink)
 
Markok765's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,894
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy K View Post
The best zoom to use for street photography is your feet. I would say that guy uses a 200mm because he doesn't really have the 'nads for real street photography.
Yeah. I want a 17-40 F4 zoom for street. I was shooting street that day with my 35mm.
__________________
Marko Kovacevic
Blog
Youtube
Markok765 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-04-2008, 07:02 PM   #23 (permalink)
 
2F/2F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 944
Default

Well, personally a 135, 200, and 300 f/4 are some of my favorite street and candid photography lenses.

But the guy in the gallery was still full of $hit.
__________________
2F/2F

Last edited by 2F/2F; 08-04-2008 at 07:13 PM.
2F/2F is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-04-2008, 08:07 PM   #24 (permalink)
 
JBrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 3,981
Blog Entries: 8
Default

I went to a gallery in Torontos distillery district today.

Very cool.

I saw some street done with just a tele 200mm lens.

Very interesting.

I spoke to the photographer, and he said that a wide limits you in street photos.

Limits are set by the photographer, not equipment, but I understand what he meant.

He also said that Canon zooms are as good quality as Leica primes.

There is a bridge for sale here.

He also said that digi black and white is the same as film black and white.

I can't believe this.


That's a load of crap. (with frosting, and a cherry)
__________________
--J Brunner, The Prints of Darkness


Developing video:
http://www.jasonbrunner.com/videos.html
JBrunner is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-04-2008, 08:32 PM   #25 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,705
Blog Entries: 4
Default

What Jay said.

You need to start having your own opinion about things, Marco, and not using other people's opinions.
Kevin Caulfield is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 08-04-2008, 09:00 PM   #26 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markok765 View Post
I went to a gallery in Torontos distillery district today. I saw some street done with just a tele 200mm lens. I spoke to the photographer, and he said that a wide limits you in street photos. He also said that Canon zooms are as good quality as Leica primes. He also said that digi black and white is the same as film black and white.

I can't believe this.
Me neither. Question is, how the images were?... did he sell?... 200 mm for street shooting? bull****... As Robert Capa said, if your photos aren't good is because you aren't close enough.
__________________
Jose A. Martinez
Jose A Martinez is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-04-2008, 09:35 PM   #27 (permalink)
 
Markok765's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,894
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Thats what I told him! Apparently he also shoots street with a 100-400 zoom.

__________________
Marko Kovacevic
Blog
Youtube
Markok765 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-04-2008, 10:29 PM   #28 (permalink)
 
Anupam Basu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markok765 View Post
Apparently he also shoots street with a 100-400 zoom.

Apart from the issue of engaging your subject etc, a long lens will affect perspective severely. It might be useful for picking off people from the distance like a sniper but it will result in severely compressed backgrounds. Might be good for candid portraiture but I don't regard that as street photography really. If I shoot portraits on the street I want them to be environmental portraits, people interacting with their surroundings, with each other and, on occasion, with the camera.

This shot I almost consider to be a portrait on the streets - 21mm - I was barely 4feet away:
__________________
My Website and Gallery
Anupam Basu is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-12-2008, 11:53 AM   #29 (permalink)
 
Simplicius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dublin Ireland
Posts: 49
Default

Funny I have been doing all my (attempts at) Street Photography with a 50mm lens and have been pondering moving up to 85mm or 135mm and seeing how that works. I tend to prefer a fixed lens, somehow the zoom gives me too much fiddle time and whatever shot I thought I saw is gone in the flow of the crowd.

I always aim for 5 foot away (with the 50mm lens) from the individual who catchs my eye and I am often caught due to the proximity. (Aside: My height doesn't help either I fear at 6'6'' but that is another thread about leprecauns are the optimum height for Street Photography)

Anyway, I'm hoping being 10- 14 feet away will make those instances of being caught less frequent.

The main thing is though as I stumble blindly on in this journey is getting a good shot is still such a buzz and long may that continue.
__________________
Simplicius

"defying gravity since 1898"

My Flickr Account
Simplicius is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-12-2008, 04:34 PM   #30 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 88
Default

Simplicius, I'm actually going the other way with street photography. I started out with a 50mm, then 35/40mm.. now I'm really craving a 28mm!

We'll see how that works out. I'm also vertically gifted at 6'7" I haven't noticed any problem with that style of shooting so far, though. Maybe I'm just used to people gawking at me!
f/stopblues is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using