Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,333   Posts: 1,537,451   Online: 1083
      
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    223
    Quote Originally Posted by perkeleellinen View Post
    Let us know how you get on.

    Just to clarify, my version (US) is very thick like syrup or runny honey. It's sticky and difficult to get off stuff it touches. Is your version like that or more liquid?
    It's more liquid, it's not slimy more like diluted honey and I can easily suck it up with a syringe and easily clean it off without much effort. So I guess that answers why all the websites list ratios different from mine. Also you mentioned 15 minutes, why 15? shouldn't it be ten minute? May I also know your agitation method? mine is

    1. For the first minutes use the screw thingy to turn the film (I'm using paterson tanks).
    2. Then use inversion every 30 seconds until development time finishes.

    I use this same method for stop bath and fixer.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Oxfordshire, UK.
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,193
    Quote Originally Posted by dreamingartemis View Post
    why 15? shouldn't it be ten minute?
    Yes, it should be ten for a normal neg. I develop longer because that produces the sort of negative I like to print with. Just personal taste - I did a bit of testing before settling on this time. I agitate continuously for the first minute and then ten seconds every subsequent minute - probably three inversions.
    Steve.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN US
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,254
    Images
    4
    Good info on HC-110 (dilutions, etc) here: http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/hc110/ though note the disclaimer that it's no longer being updated. Unfortunately, no data for Neopan.
    "Far more critical than what we know or do not know is what we do not want to know." - Eric Hoffer

  4. #14
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,253
    Images
    297
    If you didn't get enough shadow detail, you did not expose enough.

    If contrast was 'out of control' (I interpret this to mean that contrast is much too high), you developed for too long.

    Cure: Expose more. Develop less, which is hard to do at Dilution B, which is where Dilution H comes in handy, which is twice the dilution of Dilution B. Similarly, a decent starting point is to double the time of Dilution B, but since you said you have too much contrast, I would reduce that from 10 minutes to 8 minutes, and see if those negatives print better.

    Please remember: Developing times on the chemistry boxes are recommendations, not cast in stone and impossible to change. You adjust the exposure and development time to get what prints well in your darkroom, and that is something that every photographer has to learn.




    Quote Originally Posted by dreamingartemis View Post
    I know this has been asked but usually the thread devolves into Rodinal, Xtol and some other brand. I've used HCC-110 for HP5+ and it looks okay but when I tried it with Neopan 400 at 5 minutes with Dilution B, it looks like total crap (and this was after I developed 8 rolls with ). Contrast is wildy out of control and the sharpness looks bad along with shadow details.

    Though it could be due to my scanner when I prescan to get a feel what the negs would look if I printed them.

    Here is a run down of what I used and done

    1. Development using HCC-110 at Dilution B (1:7) at 5 minutes 20 celcius
    2. Stop bath with distilled vinegar at 1:9 for one minutes at 20 celcius (cannot find any stop bath indicator here so I improvided)
    3. Ilford rapid fixer at 1:4 for 5 minutes as well, all same temp.

    Am I doing something wrong? The negs come out looking rather thick. I have heaps of this film which I managed to buy cheap (because they were on sale and no where near their expiry date yet). I only have HCC-110 for now since I first tried it with my HP5+ and Pan F which works well but I've seen some incredible results by other people with neopan and thought I give it a go...
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    New York City
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12
    Neopan 400 in HC110 has been one of my favorite combinations for many years. I usually rate the film at an EI of 320 and develop in the 1:63 dilution -- so-called Dilution H -- of "syrup" to New York City tap water for 10-11 minutes at 70 degrees. That works out to 1/2 ounce of syrup in 32 oz. of water for a 4-reel Nikor stainless steel tank. While other factors may affect your results (local water, agitation, method of pouring developer in/out of tank, for example) you should be in the right general ball park with this procedure. The rest of your processing steps seem fine.
    Good luck, Paul

    QUOTE=dreamingartemis;1298973]I know this has been asked but usually the thread devolves into Rodinal, Xtol and some other brand. I've used HCC-110 for HP5+ and it looks okay but when I tried it with Neopan 400 at 5 minutes with Dilution B, it looks like total crap (and this was after I developed 8 rolls with ). Contrast is wildy out of control and the sharpness looks bad along with shadow details.

    Though it could be due to my scanner when I prescan to get a feel what the negs would look if I printed them.

    Here is a run down of what I used and done

    1. Development using HCC-110 at Dilution B (1:7) at 5 minutes 20 celcius
    2. Stop bath with distilled vinegar at 1:9 for one minutes at 20 celcius (cannot find any stop bath indicator here so I improvided)
    3. Ilford rapid fixer at 1:4 for 5 minutes as well, all same temp.

    Am I doing something wrong? The negs come out looking rather thick. I have heaps of this film which I managed to buy cheap (because they were on sale and no where near their expiry date yet). I only have HCC-110 for now since I first tried it with my HP5+ and Pan F which works well but I've seen some incredible results by other people with neopan and thought I give it a go...[/QUOTE]

  6. #16
    ParkerSmithPhoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    808
    Images
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by dreamingartemis View Post
    Am I doing something wrong? The negs come out looking rather thick.
    The best negative for scanning is on the thin side, which is totally opposite of what you need for silver printing. Diafine is great if you area using a scan and print workflow.
    Parker Smith Photography, Inc.
    Atlanta, GA

    Commercial & Fine Art Photography
    Portrait Photography

  7. #17
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,300
    Images
    60
    I have a feeling that we have a problem with communication here.

    To the OP, does your bottle look something like the one pictured here.

    In particular, does it indicate that it is to make 2 US Gallons.

    If so, then I would be willing to bet that you overlooked the instruction to make a stock solution first, before diluting that stock solution 1 +7 (for dilution B). The stock solution is made up by dumping the entire 16 ounce HC110 bottle into a larger, 64 ounce container and then filling the container with water. That results in an initial dilution of 1 + 3.

    If you do the math, it turns out that if you dilute the stock solution 1 + 7, what you end up with is a working solution of 1 + 31, or expressed differently, in 32 parts of working solution, you have one part concentrate, and 31 parts water.

    The stock solution method has some advantages (ease of handling, accuracy of measurement), but it only really make sense if you process fairly high volumes of film. Otherwise, the stock solution tends to go bad before you use it up (whereas the concentrate that comes from the manufacturer seems to last forever).

    So, as a result, most of us here tend to work straight from the concentrate. We mix a small (around 6-10 ml) of concentrate with the required amount of water, and work from there. We add 31 parts of water to each part of concentrate, and end up with dilution B. As an example, to make 320 ml of working solution, we add 10 ml of concentrate to 310 ml of water.

    If you mixed concentrate with water 1 + 7, then:

    1) your developer was 4 times regular strength (no wonder your negatives were dense!); and
    2) instead of being reasonable, your per roll cost of using HC110 is very expensive .

    Hope this helps!

    PS, in case you were wondering where the ratios come from, think of the US system where each quart of liquid is also 32 ounces
    PPS, HC110 dilution H is 1 part concentrate plus 63 parts water.
    PPPS, you have to be very careful with dilution H if you use small tanks - you need a certain minimum amount of concentrate in the tank no matter what the dilution - Kodak's capacity information works out to about 6 ml per roll, although others work with less
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails hc110.jpg  
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  8. #18
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,253
    Images
    297
    Matt,

    This is from the Covington Innovations web site for HC-110 developer:

    "Note: In Europe, HC-110 is also sold in 500-mL bottles as a less concentrated syrup which you dilute 1:9 to make dilution B. If you are using that product (Kodak CAT 500 1466), follow the instructions for the European concentrate, not those for the syrup. Although the European type of HC-110 is sold in England, there does not seem to be an English data sheet for it. Full-strength syrup is also sold in Europe so make sure you know which one you have."
    Source: http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/hc110/index.html

    If the OP has the HC-110 of Europe and mixed it 1:7 as opposed to 1:9, the contrast 'out of control' is explained by the higher concentration of developer in the mix.

    - Thomas
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  9. #19
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,300
    Images
    60
    Hi Thomas:

    That is why I included the picture .

    I also think that the OP's reference to "1:7" on the bottle means that it is the US version.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2
    This is my first post and thought I would throw in my 2 cents worth. I'm fairly new to developing, but Ive been using HC-110 and mix it to (1+49). For Neopan 400, my development time is 7 min and 15 sec.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin