Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,933   Posts: 1,585,563   Online: 743
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    mhainz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    melbourne, australia
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    49
    Images
    5

    FP4+ versus Plus X

    What are people's thoughts on these films. How do they compare / differ as far as resolution, contrast, exposure latitude, ease of use.

    I believe emulsion characteristics can differ between sheet film and roll so please comment on which format your experiences are.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Århus, Denmark
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,102
    Images
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by mhainz
    What are people's thoughts on these films. How do they compare / differ as far as resolution, contrast, exposure latitude, ease of use.

    I believe emulsion characteristics can differ between sheet film and roll so please comment on which format your experiences are.
    Both are great for my work (mostly portraits) and I think they're pretty similar (like Tri-X vs. HP5+). Both films are classic emulsions and work very well with Rodinal (I have to that when I am the High Priest in the Church Of Rodinal) )
    I have only shot the films in 35 mm (FP4 in MF, too...but not Plus-X)

    Greetings Morten

  3. #3
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,084
    Images
    1
    I used to shoot a lot of Plus-X -- began using FP4+ when Plus-X got to be hard to find. No regrets. Is it just me or, is the FP4 a little more prone to scratch in the developing tray? (sheet film)

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    2
    It's not just you. The Ilford sheet films are prone to scratches during tray development. That is why I prefer Kodak sheet film over Ilford.

  5. #5
    dr bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Annapolis, Md
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    871
    Images
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by GaussianNoise
    I used to shoot a lot of Plus-X -- began using FP4+ when Plus-X got to be hard to find. No regrets. Is it just me or, is the FP4 a little more prone to scratch in the developing tray? (sheet film)
    That seems to be the case here. Also, the emulsions are not the same. In addition, the emulsion on PXP roll film is quite differrent from that used on the sheet film. Kodak's designation did indicate a difference, but the term "PX-" still sounded like they should/would be identuical - they weren't. AFAIK, Kodak no longer makes the sheet film. A great loss to me personally.
    I love the smell of fixer in the morning. It smells like...creativity!
    Truly, dr bob.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    229
    Images
    3
    I have found Plus X a bit more contrasty than FP4+. This seems to give it a faster effective speed. I find that I get the best results out of Plus X if I meter it at 125, while FP4+ works better if I meter at about 80. This is for 135 format, developed in D76 1+1.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin