Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,899   Posts: 1,521,073   Online: 925
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    mikewhi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Redmond, WA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    808
    Images
    9

    Opinions RE: Ektapan and Plus-X

    Hi:

    I have a lot of experience with Plus-x but not with Ektapan. Can someone with experience with both (or just Ektapan) expound on the virtures on Ektapan and possibly compare to Plus-X?

    I am aware of the state of their production status or lack thereof. I am just asking for technical and aesthetic feedback.

    Thanks.

    -Mike

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,158
    Images
    20
    Ektapan is a really nice portrait film. The tonal range is kind of like Plus-X, but the spectral sensitivity is a little different--maybe more like T-Max. It responds nicely to ABC pyro and prints beautifully on Azo. I've used it in 8x10" and 11x14".
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3
    mikewhi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Redmond, WA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    808
    Images
    9
    Why would it be nice(r) for portraits? Is it not as sharp as Plus-X so maybe it doesn't show show many 'defects'? Is it not as contrasty as Plus-X can be? Do you know how well it responds to plus\minus development? If it prints well on Azo, I'd imagine it is capable of a lot of contrast, no?

    Thanks.

    -Mike

  4. #4
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,158
    Images
    20
    It's hard to describe what makes it such a nice portrait film. I'm using it in large format for contact prints, so it's not really a resolution issue. I think it's a spectral sensitivity issue--skin just looks different with Ektapan. Maybe the gradation in the midtones is also somewhat smoother.

    I didn't find it as satisfactory for landscapes, but maybe I would need to use it more to figure out what situations called for it. Since it's out of production, though, I'll probably keep my remaining sheets for the application I like it for.

    It is capable of expansion and contraction and prints well on Azo, but since I'm using it in the studio almost exclusively, I always process it normally and control contrast with lighting.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin