Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,299   Posts: 1,535,792   Online: 684
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Pushing Acros

  1. #1
    BetterSense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,862

    Pushing Acros

    I just got back from vacation to find that my XA was loaded with Acros 100 instead of Tri-X 400 like I thought.

    Does anyone have any times/temps for pushing Acros? I have Xtol, HC110, Diafine, and Dektol.
    f/22 and be there.

  2. #2
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,911
    Images
    1
    Nope, won't work. Gotta go back on vacation and shoot it all again! ;-)
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  3. #3
    Klainmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,493
    Images
    30
    For Xtol, I've done 1+1 @ 13 for lower contrast and the same @ 16 for higher. Worked well.

    I made the same mistake whence I though I had Neopan 400 in there instead. It should be fine.
    K.S. Klain

  4. #4
    Gim
    Gim is offline

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    399
    If I remember right Thomas Bertilsson likes to uses Acros 100 at EI 400 for portraits. If he doesn't jump in here...PM him. Thomas uses X-tol also and his numbers may match above. If so, you're going to be in good company.

    Jim

  5. #5
    brian steinberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    2,331
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    100
    I've had luck pushing Across to EI 200 and developing in Xtol 1:1 for 14 minutes. This was in overcast lighting and is the most I would consider pushing the film without extreme developing techniques. I couldn't imagine the shadow detail i would lose in contrasty lighting. But for flat lighting it was great! Here's an example...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails boats, laurel lake 5-13-11.jpg  

  6. #6
    K-G
    K-G is offline
    K-G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Göteborg , Sweden
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    301
    As Gim mentioned, the subject has been up for discussion before. I enclose a link to the descriptions given by Thomas Bertilsson . Good luck !

    Karl-Gustaf

    http://www.apug.org/forums/viewpost.php?p=1150481
    Karl-Gustaf Hellqvist

    www.heliochroma.com

  7. #7
    BetterSense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,862
    Thanks all. I think I will try Xtol 1+1 for 15 minutes.
    f/22 and be there.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,629
    If you can spare the extra roll or two, and the time, it would be worth trying it on some test rolls before you do your vacation photos.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    743
    Images
    28
    Based on admittedly limited experience, Diafine should also do a reasonable job for you. I've shot Acros at 250 and 320 and developed in Diafine, and the results weren't too bad at all. Diafine should help keep the contrast manageable.

    As Michael said though, a test roll (under similar lighting if possible) is the safest bet.

  10. #10
    BetterSense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,862
    I went ahead with 16 minutes, agitation every 5 minutes. The roll is junk, and development had nothing to do with it. I thought there was Tri-X in there, and I'm not averse to underexposing that by a stop if I need to, so Acros didn't stand a chance. There may be one or two salvageable images.

    Moral: Don't underexpose your film by 2 stops+ stops.
    f/22 and be there.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin