Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,557   Posts: 1,545,213   Online: 924
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    984

    Can leaving out bromide give a bit more speed with ID-68?

    I notice on the web site

    http://www.lostlabours.co.uk/photogr...rs/devID68.htm

    the formula for ID-68 contains no bromide although the replenisher does. Other sites show some KBr. I have used Pyrocat-HD without bromide (as suggested for some uses by Sandy King who invented it) which is supposed to give marginally more speed at the expense of a little fog. Is the bromide essential for the ID-68?

  2. #2
    Athiril's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,535
    Images
    28
    Link is broken.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    290
    Hello,
    some developer substances give more fog and some less. Phenidone has a certain tendency to give more fog and Phenidone developers need more KBr or even Benzotriazole. D-76 (a hydroquinone-metol developer) does not contain KBr as it works clear without too much fog. If you leave out some KBr, you'll get more fog, the useable sensitivity will increase a little bit. I'm wondering why the replenisher does contain KBr and the developer not as the developer is enriched with KBr with every roll of film which was developed in the solution. Therefore I would not put in KBr in a replenisher.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    984

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Plymouth. UK.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,401
    Images
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by john_s View Post
    I notice on the web site

    http://www.lostlabours.co.uk/photogr...rs/devID68.htm

    the formula for ID-68 contains no bromide although the replenisher does. Other sites show some KBr. I have used Pyrocat-HD without bromide (as suggested for some uses by Sandy King who invented it) which is supposed to give marginally more speed at the expense of a little fog. Is the bromide essential for the ID-68?
    The link shows that the developer does contain potassium bromide.

    It is the replenisher that doesn't have it.

    IDK how much more noticeable the base fog will be if you omit the restrainer in the developer.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,752
    Hi John,

    ID-68 is a balanced formula. If leaving out the restrainer was a net improvement (ie more speed without unfavourable impacts on other image characteristics outweighing the speed increase), Ilford's chemists probably would have left out the restrainer.

    Why would you want to do this though? What real benefit is there to a small speed increase? It's not the type of thing that will make the difference between say needing a tripod or not. Suppose you got an extra 1/3 stop? So what? Why not just give more exposure?

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Escondido, California, USA
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    655
    John, I suggest that you mix 1/4 litre of ID-68 with *no* bromide in it. And develop a test-strip.
    Now add 0.5/4 (0.125) grams of bromide to the soup. Dev a 2nd test-strip.
    And add 0.125 more grams of bromide. Dev a 3rd test-strip.

    Now you have strips showing the effects of 0, 0.5 and 1.0 g/L of bromide.
    Select the one you like most.

    Mark Overton

  8. #8
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,032
    Images
    65
    Neither D76 nor D76R have bromide in my Kodak formula book. The same is true of the reference cited above.

    PE

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    984
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael R 1974 View Post
    Hi John,

    ID-68 is a balanced formula. If leaving out the restrainer was a net improvement (ie more speed without unfavourable impacts on other image characteristics outweighing the speed increase), Ilford's chemists probably would have left out the restrainer.

    Why would you want to do this though? What real benefit is there to a small speed increase? It's not the type of thing that will make the difference between say needing a tripod or not. Suppose you got an extra 1/3 stop? So what? Why not just give more exposure?
    I didn't ever think that the difference would be gigantic. All formulas are compromises. I think that newer films show less fog than the older ones. ID-68 is an old formula. If I were using a tripod then I probably wouldn't be using a speed-increasing formula like ID-68 or Microphen.

    However the main reason I thought about cutting the bromide is that Ian Grant's website shows the formula for ID-68 without bromide. Either it's an inadvertent omission, or he knows something that I don't know.

    I will try Mark's suggestion as soon as I have time.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,752
    Interesting. Usually Ian Grant is a stickler for referencing correct formulae, so I'd be surprised if it was an inadvertant ommission.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin