TriX vs HP5+

[dasBlute]

1/2 step test strip, works other values as well...


08|08|04|04|02|02|04 <- incremental exposure L-to-R
------------------------------
32|24|16|12|08|06|04 <- resultant exposures

[Jerevan]

I don't know about you - I find the progression from f/stops on the camera to the f/stop timer much more easy. Or, if you want to make it cheaper, the f/stop table.

And I think you can bend Tri-X or HP5+ to whatever you want it to be (within reason - of course you can't make Delta 100 or Tmax 100!). The negative is just a start.

[MattKing]

I've spent a whole chunk of my life using the 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22, 32 progression on my camera (s).

I guess it just gives me comfort .

[Thomas Bertilsson]

I've spent a whole chunk of my life using the 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22, 32 progression on my camera (s).

I guess it just gives me comfort .

Comfort is good. I just want something I can keep track of with a metronome. Even seconds work best for me.

[ChristopherCoy]

Thanks for all the great info, whether on topic or not! I've learned a few things that I hope to try soon.