Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,047   Posts: 1,560,999   Online: 1070
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Andover Ma
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    25
    Images
    1

    DK-50 and it's use

    I have been given about a dozen hermetically sealed packets of DK-50 powder. Has anyone used this for Tmax100. I've been using hc110, but with all this developer, I would hate to chuck it. Still soft in the packs. Any ideas??
    Bart

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by $modelman$
    I have been given about a dozen hermetically sealed packets of DK-50 powder. Has anyone used this for Tmax100. I've been using hc110, but with all this developer, I would hate to chuck it. Still soft in the packs. Any ideas??
    Bart
    Kodak DK-50 is a general purpose MQ film developer. I just posted the formulation in the APUG Chemistry Recipes.

    Mix some up and try it. I would try it both undiluted and diluted 1:1 and compare the results to HC110.

    You could also try adding a smidgen (.1 to .2 grams/liter) of Ascorbic acid.
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Andover Ma
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    25
    Images
    1
    What kind of times at 68 degreas?
    bart

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Louisiana, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,325
    The newspaper where I once worked used DK-50. It was affectionately called "DK-grain" by the other photographers. Fresh and full strength it was about 2 1/2 minutes for Tri-X shot normally. When processing time extended to 5 minutes, it was tossed out. Thirty-five mm negatives were nasty--big mushy grain balls and lots of contrast. The only reason it was used at the paper was because it was fast and fast was more important than good (which is why newspapers use digital today). Later everyone switched to FG7.

  5. #5
    bobfowler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New Jersey, Land of the Living Dead
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,440
    Images
    19

    Here's a starting point

    I tried it years ago with Tmax 100. I wasn't crazy about the results, but I'm not crazy about Tmax anyway. I got my best results diluted 1:1 for 6 minutes @68F (that was 35mm film in a small tank, 3 inversions per minute).
    Bob Fowler
    fowler@verizon.net
    Some people are like Slinkies. They're really good for nothing, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Andover Ma
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    25
    Images
    1
    Thanks, I'll try that
    Bart

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,603
    Images
    9
    i used to process boxes and boxes of 5x7 sheet film deep tank in hangers in undiluted dk50. the 4x5 was my film, the 5x7 was for a portrait photographer. i would normally enlarge her split and full 5x7 negatives, sometimes to 16x20 or 20x24, we never had any problem with grain. ( she shot all tri-x and tri-x ortho ). we used dk 50r ( replenisher ) and never had straight/new/fresh developer --- we "mellowed" the fresh tank with about 1/3 the spent developer - maybe that is why we never had harsh contrast or grain issues. it was about 16 years ago, but from what i remember i usually processed @ 68º for about 6-7 minutes ...

    john

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by $modelman$
    What kind of times at 68 degreas?
    bart
    I posted ballpark development times (5 to 10 minutes at 68F) and suggested dilutions (straight and 1:1) with the formula. You would need to determine the actuals by testing.

    Diluted - maybe with a smidgen of ascorbic acid added, it might work pretty well with films like TMax 100.

    A "smidgen" of ascorbic acid would be something like 0.1 to 0.2 grams per liter.

    I get my ascorbic acid (food grade) at Trader Joe's Market.
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  9. #9
    glbeas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Roswell, Ga. USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,307
    Images
    109
    Would the stuff do for print developer? I have a couple of cans sitting around but have no desire to submit my film to its abuse.
    Gary Beasley

  10. #10
    Charles Webb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Colorfull, Canon City Colorado
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,723
    Methinks someone is a bit confused about DK 50. We used it for years at the Denver Post for use with 4x5 on fast breaking news and it was/is excellent.

    DK 50 was never intended to be used with 35mm, or medium format for that matter. Sheet film was it's forte. For quick 35mm development that gave grain as described by some one else was developed in straight Dektol. I have used Dk50 for more years than I can count, it is vertually grainless with TriX, Plue X, most of the old Geavert films and last but not least works very well with T Max.

    Sorry, but DK 50 is a darn good developer, if the gentleman that has about a dozen packages (one gallon I suppose) wants to cut me a deal on about six gallons, I'll buy it from him.

    Respectfully,
    Charles Webb

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin