Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,921   Posts: 1,584,902   Online: 1115
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    cmo
    cmo is offline
    cmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    1,457
    Images
    57

    A short note about film quality....

    A while ago there were rumours that a company named Maco had sold 120 slide films that had been cut too small: 60mm instead of 61,5mm width. That does make a difference in most cameras, I think. So, there was a product recall.

    The former Maco director just confirmed that the films were purchased by Lomo for a bargain price - and they sold the faulty films to their customers - this link is only in german language:

    http://www.aphog.de/forum/viewtopic....206979#p206979

    I wonder whether the customers that bought these films got some hugs and kisses from Maco and Lomo - most people prefer to be kissed before they get f*****...
    The future belongs to the few of us still willing to get our hands smell like fixing bath.

  2. #2
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,435
    Images
    148
    That doesn't surprise many of us.

    Ian

  3. #3
    Slixtiesix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    803
    Images
    21
    That would have been my question too. Would Lomo users care anyway?

  4. #4
    Diapositivo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,844
    This is perfectly in line with the Lomo aesthetic of "unpredictable" results, the magic flair of randomness

    Brilliant move!

    It can actually work with any batch problem.
    Fabrizio Ruggeri fine art photography site: http://fabrizio-ruggeri.artistwebsites.com
    Stock images at Imagebroker: http://www.imagebroker.com/#/search/ib_fbr

  5. #5
    bsdunek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,156
    Images
    211
    Agree. Would a Diana or Holga know the difference? They don't have much in the way of film guides anyway. As Diapositivo says, "This is perfectly in line with the Lomo aesthetic of "unpredictable" results, the magic flair of randomness"
    Bruce

    Moma don't take my Kodachrome away!
    Oops, Kodak just did!
    For all practical purposes, they've taken Kodak away.


    BruceCSdunekPhotography.zenfolio.com

  6. #6
    cmo
    cmo is offline
    cmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    1,457
    Images
    57
    If you buy a Lomo you know what you get and that you pay a high price for a plastic camera. No secrets about it. It's your decision whether you want it.

    But selling faulty products as normal products without telling people that they are faulty, that's a different thing. There are very ugly words to describe this kind of business conduct.
    The future belongs to the few of us still willing to get our hands smell like fixing bath.

  7. #7
    Rudeofus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,825
    Images
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by cmo View Post
    But selling faulty products as normal products without telling people that they are faulty, that's a different thing. There are very ugly words to describe this kind of business conduct.
    The post you linked to specifically mentions that Lomo honestly told their customers that their film stock was too small. Maybe Hartmuth added this later in his posting, but it is there for all to see, so the situation is not as bad as you make it seem. What surprises me more is that in the 21st century confectioning companies make such screw ups, it's not like 120 roll film is a new product line ...
    Trying to be the best of whatever I am, even if what I am is no good.

  8. #8
    AndreasT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Berlin
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    355
    Talking about film quality, I few years ago, 2-3 years ago. I enlarged a photo from slow speed film from one of the alternative manufactures.
    Meaning not Ilford or Kodak. This film had "holes" in the emulsion. The coating was not even orsomething and there were white spots on the photo. Meaning there were dark spots on the negative. It was made from a 35mm film (x-pan camera I think it was) and enlarged to about 80cm on the short side.
    The manufacturer/distributor was informed and knew about this problems as far as I recall, but they kept it quiet because they had a large batch and many were sold already. However on normal sized prints nothing could really be seen.

  9. #9
    piu58's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Leipzig, Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    605
    > Meaning there were dark spots on the negative

    I had similar problems with maybe the same product (RR Tonal). I gave up to use such films. We can try to use budget-piced paper but not film. Negatives cannot be replace by a better version.
    ---
    Uwe Pilz



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin