Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,953   Posts: 1,557,986   Online: 1103
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    agphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    638
    Images
    14

    Shot Tri-X @ EI3200 but....

    So I was at a music festival today and shot half a dozen rolls of film. Three of which were rolls of Tri-X in my Hexar AF. One roll, the last one was shot at 3200. In my state of total exhaustion upon arriving home just now I pulled that last roll out of the Hexar and dropped it into the pile with the other rolls before remembering to mark it!

    Now I'm not sure which roll it was of the three . I don't want to risk ruining the other two, so I'm wondering how badly underexposed will that roll be if it is processed at 400? I realize it'll be dark but will it be salvageable? I'm so bummed out as it was a whole roll of Jane's Addiction live this evening and I was right up front.

    I took a guess as to which roll it MIGHT be, but I can't be sure.

    What should I do guys?
    - Abram

    Mamiya 7II / Hasselblad 500CM

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    235
    depending on how important the other two rolls are, i'd just push them all. Or if the other two are more important, process them all normally.

  3. #3
    EASmithV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,877
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images
    123
    clip test the last frame to see which one it is?
    www.EASmithV.com

    "The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera."— Dorothea Lange
    http://www.flickr.com/easmithv/
    RIP Kodachrome

  4. #4
    agphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    638
    Images
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by F/1.4 View Post
    depending on how important the other two rolls are, i'd just push them all. Or if the other two are more important, process them all normally.
    Well this last roll was taking a chance because the light at the stage was rather dim (between 1/60-1/30 @ f/2 ISO 3200) so I probably will have more keepers from the other two rolls. Nothing is for an assignment which is why I shot film, this was just for fun, but I wanted to get the best results I could obviously.

    And in regard to the clip test comment, I'll ask my lab if they'll do that for me, I don't have the provisions at home to process yet but I do have a trustworthy lab.

    Well I learned that lesson MARK YOUR ROLLS FIRST.
    - Abram

    Mamiya 7II / Hasselblad 500CM

  5. #5
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,773
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    I think you should just process all three as you would normally for the other two.

    A 3-stop push may only move the shadow point on the film curve up 2/3 to 1-stop. It can help but it's not a magic bullet.

    If you actually got close to a usable exposure, something inside Tri-X's real physical limits, you will get a reasonable amount of info on film curve even with normal development.

    Pushing is not about getting lots of great shadow detail, it is about making the info you do get when you underexpose (shoot at say 3200), easier to print.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  6. #6
    Rom
    Rom is offline
    Rom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Lyon - France
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    133
    Images
    3
    Which dev are you planning to use ?

    Perhaps using diafine could be a good solution. It has good results from 400 up to 1600.
    All the best,
    Rom
    ___________________
    Blog | G+ | My DeviantArt

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    15
    do them 1 by 1 @ 400. This way the first role will be 1 in 3 chance, the second a 1 in 2... Who knows, you might get lucky.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,562
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    8
    get a dark green safelight filter.
    process the rolls 1 at a time, and
    after each roll being processed
    pull it out of your tank and see if
    your film was processed.
    you will easily see there is something on the film
    and because it is a green filter, you can easily develop by inspection.
    THEN
    when you find the roll that looks like there is nothing on it, stick it back
    in your tank and finish processing it.

    have fun !
    john

    http://www.michaelandpaula.com/mp/devinsp.html
    explains it all ...

  9. #9
    Chris Lange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    764
    Images
    33
    Since your lab is handling it, clip tests are the way to go, hands down.
    See my work at my website CHRISTOPHER LANGE PHOTOGRAPHY

    or my snaps at my blog MINIMUM DENSITY
    --
    If you don't have it, then you don't have it.

  10. #10
    Bill Burk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    3,430
    Images
    46
    I'd say don't develop the 3200 normally, there won't be anything there.

    Check with the lab of course, snip tests may save the day but they may be able to Develop by Inspection and see the roll that needs additional time.

    Or what's the worst can happen if you push them all 2 stops? Some dense contrasty negatives that need Grade 0 to print.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin