Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,266   Posts: 1,534,322   Online: 800
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Linköping, Sweden
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    74
    Images
    7

    Experiences with RPX400?

    I'm simply curious on your experiences with RPX400.

    I've tried it at ISO200 (after determing my effective film speed) in HC110 dil. B, but it was lacking midtone contrast (maybe I incorrectly performed my effective film speed test) while the negatives exposed after ISO320 does look a lot better in midtone contrast.

    I usually scan my negatives, but sometimes I find the time for some proper darkroom printing. Haven't printed any RPX400 yet but any day now...

    Your impressions? Has anyone tried it in R09? Or the special purpose RPX-D developer?

  2. #2
    Kevin Caulfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,098
    Blog Entries
    5
    Images
    52
    Is this a Rollei version of Agfa APX400? If so, I believe it would be from the Agfa master rolls, and therefore should be APX400. If so, it should be fine in R09, as R09 is virtually the same as Rodinal, and APX400 and Rodinal play well together. From memory Rodinal 1+25 for about 8 minutes should work.

  3. #3
    wildbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Grand Rapids
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,386
    Images
    140
    after your thread on top, there are several regarding this film: http://www.apug.org/forums/google.ph...f=&ss=21j441j2
    www.vinnywalsh.com

    I know what I want but I just don't know how to go about gettin' it.-Hendrix

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Paris, France
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14
    Hello, I have just finished ten rolls of this RPX400 in 120 version and souped in rodinal stand 1:100. Attached is a direct scan from a session. Can't give much exposure settings because i just winged it sunny 16 for the entire shoot and my rolls turned out fine for printing. Will give it a go under enlarger this weekend.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails apug-4.jpg  

  5. #5

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Linköping, Sweden
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    74
    Images
    7
    I've already read most threads on RPX400, and I've read a lot of dev.charts. from the manufacturer, I'm mostly interested in other peoples experiences with the film, in different developers.

  7. #7
    hmzimelka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Cape Town
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    29
    I too would like to know more about this film.
    All I can say that I find it looks positively ugly in Rodinal; Flat, dull, poor tonal separation.

    It's much nicer in Studional (Rodinal Spezial), but not amazing.

    So far, the best results I have gotten with this film are using Diafine rated at ASA 800 to 1600.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6389310925_c85493bc13_o.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	373.4 KB 
ID:	57792

    I tried to develop a roll through Rodinal 1:25, but base fog was high. Once scanned and curves were tweaked, results were OK. In my opinion, a last resort combination.
    Bellow is RPX 400 developed in Rodinal 1:25 for 5:33min at 19,5ºC.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	7949302994_9c25656c6f_o.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	620.3 KB 
ID:	57789
    Last edited by hmzimelka; 09-28-2012 at 01:22 AM. Click to view previous post history.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin