Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,931   Posts: 1,585,435   Online: 1056
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    andrew.roos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    486
    Images
    12
    I quite often shoot D100 at ISO 50. It works fine, you just develop normally.

    D100 has a straight-line region that extends from about 3 stops below nominal exposure for ISO 100, to about 7 stops above. So if you shoot it at ISO 50 you gain a stop on the low side and lose a stop on the high side, giving you a straight-line region from about 4 stops below nominal (at ISO 50) to 6 stops above. This gives you more protection against blocked shadows, provided you don't have any extreme highlights to worry about.

    My only concern would be if you have bright highlights or over-expose, you might find the negative density exceeds the Dmax of your scanner. I have no practical experience of this as I print in the darkroom.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,820
    Really depends on your developer. But the way I do it, Delta 100 has quite a long toe, and I like most
    of the exposure on the relatively straight line part of the curve; so I rate it at 50. TMX on the other hand
    has quite a bit of contrast not only overall, but way down into the shadows, with relatively little toes;
    and it's a film that can block up in the highlights under extreme brightness range, so I expose it at 100,
    just as mfg rated. These two films might have similarites in grain, but not in curve shape. They are very
    different animals in that respect.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hawaii
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    720
    If you're planning on shooting in Bright Light, don't overlook Microdol-X 1:0, if you don't mind a slight softening of grain. It has a nice effect on strong highlights for Tmax 100, like Panatomic-X IMO.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    11
    Thanks all, some great info in here. I should have mentioned that I'm shooting with a Leica IIIf using a 5cm Elmar. The options for using a filter are rather slim and expensive, so I've ruled that out for now. I do have a CV 35 as well, so maybe I should just find a 35mm viewfinder so I can use that with filters. I may have to research Microdol-X/Perceptol...etc. I do plan on shooting a few rolls this weekend as we are expecting about 2 feet of snow Friday night, so come Saturday afternoon when the suns out, my scenes will be more than bright!

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,108
    Forget about Microdol(-X), Perceptol etc with TMax 100 or Delta 100. You'll gain nothing there. Use what you're using, or use a general purpose developer like D-76 or XTOL, Ilford DDX etc.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin