Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,736   Posts: 1,670,426   Online: 825
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    cliveh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,189
    Images
    347
    What a strange thread. Surely the pedantics of developer usage, diluted or otherwise are of no importance when processing what you shot into a printable negative?

    “The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”

    Francis Bacon

  2. #12
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,939
    Images
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by cliveh View Post
    What a strange thread. Surely the pedantics of developer usage, diluted or otherwise are of no importance when processing what you shot into a printable negative?
    We could say what a strange reply.

    In practice it's actually extremely important to have your processing under your full control to get good consistent results.

    In the late 1960's I used the technique of increasing dev times in unreplenished developer, I soon switched to replenishment as it made sense and results where totally predictable.

    There's various development options but which ever is chosen it's important to learn to get it right that way you can concentrate on making images with confidence.

    Ian

  3. #13
    tony lockerbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bega N.S.W. Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,337
    Images
    411
    Or use the DD method....dilute and discard....works for me!

  4. #14
    cliveh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,189
    Images
    347
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    In practice it's actually extremely important to have your processing under your full control to get good consistent results.Ian
    I agree and that is exactly why I wonder why the OP is questioning dilution/or not and quantaties of developer.

    “The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”

    Francis Bacon

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Dunedin,New Zealand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    272
    It seems counter-intuitive to me to re-use a single batch of Xtol until it runs out of oomph.
    If you stopped after a few films,depending on your developer volume,you will have a "seasoned"batch of developer,which you can keep at a stable level of activity by replenishment.
    Xtol,being its own replenisher,makes it more amenable to this than D76.
    I first learnt about this on this forum - I'll never go back.
    Thanks folks

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, England
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    In the late 1960's I used the technique of increasing dev times in unreplenished developer, I soon switched to replenishment as it made sense and results where totally predictable.
    Ian
    I've tended to steer away from replenishment but maybe will try it with Xtol as it sounds rather simple, since the replenisher is the developer. However, doesn't your replenisher get stale as you decant it into the developer i.e. as the air gap at the top of the bottle of replenisher increases?

    Lawrence

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin