Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,224   Posts: 1,532,610   Online: 894
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    grommi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    100

    Phenidon-Ascorbate developer high base fog?

    I read Pat Gainers articles on phenidon/ascobate developers and tried to mix my own simple one shot developer. That's what I mixed:

    4 g/l sodium carbonate anhydrous
    4 g/l ascorbic acid (pure)
    0.5 g/l pot. bromide
    0.1 g/l phenidone

    Added in given order. I use stock solutions of phenidone in glycol and bromide in a. dest.

    pH is about 9.5

    I used Pats recommended relation of ascorbic acid / phenidone = 40/1. Negs are of low contrast and underdeveloped, but base fog is very high: 0.68 with HP5+. See graph below, red curve, exposed as Iso 800, real speed about Iso 200 with low gamma, all densities above base fog = 0.68.

    Developed 10 minutes 20 °C, agitation first minute cont., then 3x every 60 sec. If I would increase development time I will get even more base fog. What's wrong here? Is this developer prone to exessive base fog? Any suggestions?

    Best - Reinhold

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	test.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	69.2 KB 
ID:	64129

  2. #2
    georgegrosu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    155
    I am not familiar with graphs of this type.
    I use diagram density - log H. Probably is a error from write.
    Fog density of 0.68 seems a bit high and not shown on the graph.

    George

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southern USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,769
    Quote Originally Posted by grommi View Post
    I read Pat Gainers articles on phenidon/ascobate developers and tried to mix my own simple one shot developer.
    Creating a useful and reliable developer is a very complex endeavor requiring among other thinks a good knowledge of photochemistry. It is not just dumping a bunch of chemicals into water. A point that I agued with PG over and over again. I doubt he ever really got the point of the argument. Check the current thread "Progress on XTOL-concentrate." to see just how difficult the problem is. The thread is now at 48 pages and still very active.
    A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man contemplates it, bearing within him the image of a cathedral.

    ~Antoine de Saint-Exupery

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,609
    Not only the chemistry knowledge, but the ability and equipment required to do proper testing of the formula on films - which is very, very far beyond the means of anyone on APUG past or present. Which is why in all honesty using any formula that has not come out of Kodak or Ilford at this point is mostly guesswork with results based on anectodal evidence at best. By the way that includes Crawley, current staining formulas, and anything else anyone has come up with.

    This won't be a popular opinion of course.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Escondido, California, USA
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    654
    Quote Originally Posted by grommi View Post
    I read Pat Gainers articles on phenidon/ascobate developers and tried to mix my own simple one shot developer. (...)
    Reinhold,

    Here's a simple one-shot developer I discovered last year. It uses only three chemicals, and gives quality near-XTOL:
    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum37/9...l-quality.html

    As Jerry and Michael R have pointed out, much testing is needed to qualify a developer. I am the person doing the work in the "Progress of XTOL-concentrate" thread. I've restricted myself to using only these chemicals: sodium sulfite, sodium metaborate, ascorbic acid, phenidone/dimezone. All except sulfite are dissolved in propylene glycol. That's a simple developer. But even after experimenting with it for a year, I'm still getting surprises. You should expect surprises. High fog was your first surprise. I assure you there are more. But I encourage you to experiment. I have made several new discoveries (at least, they are not in the literature). Perhaps you will make a discovery...

    Mark Overton

  6. #6
    grommi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    100
    Thanks a lot, Mark. To be honest, the "Progress on XTOL-concentrate"-thread makes me dizzy and I appreciate your simple PC-Sulfite formula.

    I like simple formulas for a one-shot devloper that I can mix myself. P, C, and S are easily available, many other agents aren't like metaborate and borax or TEA, that are very resticted to buy for private persons where I live. BTW, I have the same P as you with CAS-# 92-43-3. I will try your PCS recipe, if I shouldn't be satisfied I still have my Caffenols I will report.

    Thanks a lot everybody here at Apug. Best - Reinhold
    Last edited by grommi; 02-15-2013 at 01:56 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Escondido, California, USA
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    654
    Quote Originally Posted by grommi View Post
    Thanks a lot, Mark. To be honest, the "Progress on XTOL-concentrate"-thread makes me dizzy and I appreciate your simple PC-Sulfite formula.

    I like simple formulas for a one-shot devloper that I can mix myself. P, C, and S are easily available, many other agents aren't like metaborate and borax or TEA, that are very resticted to buy for private persons where I live. BTW, I have the same P as you with CAS-# 92-43-3. I will try your PCS recipe, if I shouldn't be satisfied I still have my Caffenols I will report.
    Reinhold, I have learned more in the year since I discovered PC-Sulfite. If you decide to mix it, I suggest reducing the Phenidone to 0.10 g/litre. If you try it, could you post a response to that "PC-Sulfite" thread?

    Good luck,

    Mark

  8. #8
    grommi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    100
    "If you try it, could you post a response to that "PC-Sulfite" thread?"

    Yes, I'll do.

  9. #9
    Patrick Robert James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    252
    Images
    35
    I have been using a Phenidone/AA paper developer off and on for years and I have noticed that it needs a lot of restrainer to keep the whites clean on some papers. I stick with it though because it is easy to make.

    I do seem to recall from my research a few years ago that it is better to use an organic restrainer with Phenidone so I use Benzotriazole not KBr for what that is worth to you. I am not an expert though so maybe someone who is can comment on that.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,132
    In this thread are curves for PC-TEA pH~9 and PC-Glycol (pH~10.5,my guess) ,there is nothing unusual about them, not much fog.

    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum37/1...veloper-5.html

    One might expect the developer used by Reinhold, pH~9.5 to give a similar result.
    One very simple question, the film was properly fixed?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin