Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,551   Posts: 1,573,120   Online: 744
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684

    Diafine - Substitute Formula

    This formula is from Patrick Dignan's book Classic B&W Formulas.

    Solution A
    Sodium Sulfite, 35 grams - Hydroquinone, 6 grams
    Phenidone, 0.2 grams - Sodium Bisulfite, 6 grams
    Water to make, 1 liter

    Solution B
    Sodium Sulfite, 65 grams - Sodium Metaborate, 20 grams
    Or, Borax 20 grams, for results "like that of D76"
    Water to make, 1 liter

    Mr. R. W. Anderson who wrote the article, claims a true
    one stop speed boost plus "the advantages ... of
    a two bath".

    Have any experience with Diafine or the Homebrew
    version? Is it realy as long lived as some say? Dan

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    Yes, this recipe works fine and has a good shelf life. This recipe has been posted several times before on APUG.
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    Three chemicals with regenerative properties and, I'd think, a
    somewhat high ph, account for it's short processing time. Also
    the amount of phenidone, even at a 1:9 dilution, is higher
    than some.

    I've read that today's thin emulsion films are not candidates
    for a Diafine like two-bath type of processing. Diafine though is
    not the only A-B developer on the market. I wonder if there really
    are any film/A-B mismatches?

  4. #4
    Dean Williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Northern Idaho
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    212
    Images
    5
    I haven't used Diafine with a lot of different films, but have had good results with the films I've tried in it. Speed wise, it makes Tri-X go fast, though not the 1600 that Diafine claims, IMO.
    There are a couple of films that actually loose speed in Diafine, according to the makers.
    I'd say the keeping qualities are amazing for a solution that is mixed from a powder, used and poured back into the bottles over and over again, and stored for indeterminate weeks before being used again. My current batch is over a year and a half old, and shows no sign of weakness.
    [COLOR=Sienna][FONT=Arial]Some days are diamonds. Some days a tree crashes through your roof.[/FONT][/COLOR]

  5. #5
    gainer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    3,726
    Images
    2
    I wonder if some claims of speed enhancement are not the result of times when the ASA spec was used. It had a considerably higher safety factor for metering than the ISO. Acufine and Diafine first came out when we still had ASA on the box. Nowadays, we see numerous photographers who set their meters a stop or so slower for best shadows. Just a thought.
    Gadget Gainer

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    Quote Originally Posted by gainer
    I wonder if some claims of speed enhancement are not
    the result of times when the ASA spec was used. It had
    a considerably higher safety factor for metering than the
    ISO. Acufine and Diafine first came out when we still had
    ASA on the box. Nowadays, we see numerous
    photographers who set their meters a stop or
    so slower for best shadows. Just a thought.
    Plus X and Tri X were 125 and 400 ASA and are now the same
    ISO. It is my understanding that the International standard and
    the USA's ASA are equivalent. Perhaps you are thinking of the
    earlier Weston standard. Dan

  7. #7
    fhovie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Port Hueneme, California - USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,247
    Images
    92
    I mixed the above formula and it gave me a lot of fog - it was really a flop - I would reconsider usining it but wonder if I should add some benzotriazole.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Phoeinx Arizona
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,343
    I have used Dinafine over the years, and just assumed that a thick emlusion soaked up more part A than newer thin emlusions so you cannot push TAX 400 as much as you can Tri X.

    Regards

    Paul

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    I put a couple of rolls through Diafine a few years ago and
    did not like the fog levels it gave and it's turning brown.

    The less vigorous borax version, or even a bicarbonate version,
    may clear everything up and give near same results. Dan

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    192
    An interesting / old thread.

    Another thing to try......



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin