Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,704   Posts: 1,548,474   Online: 862
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Louisiana, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,325

    Pan F Plus in Microdol-X (vs. Perceptol)

    Is anyone using Microdol-X currently as a substitute for Perceptol when processing Pan F Plus? If so, is there any significant difference in grey tones and grain between using it full strength (and replenished) or diluted 1:1 or 1:3 (for one-shot use)? I mostly use this film in 120 size, very little in 35mm.

    I can't find Perceptol, so I bought some Microdol-X to try with Pan F Plus. I used to process the old Pan F in Perceptol 25-30 years ago and those negatives still produce printw with the smoothest tones I've ever made. I've been using D76 1:1 and 1:3 but the negatives lack that creamy look.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,025
    I may be wrong, but I am under the impression that Microdal X is to perceptol what D76 is to ID11. Essentially the same.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Stanworth
    I may be wrong, but I am under the impression that Microdal X is to perceptol what D76 is to ID11. Essentially the same.
    I hope you're right!!! Perceptol has become very hard to find recently. My local shops, plus my usual mail order shops (B&H and Adorama) are out and don't seem to be getting any more in. I've been using Perceptol exclusively for the last couple of years and am down to my last box.
    Jacob

  4. #4
    djklmnop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    230
    Images
    9
    Didn't you hear? Ilford is discontinuing it. Perceptol is cheaper and gives about the same quality as Microdol-X. I stopped using Microdol shortly after I discovered the price difference and tested the two developers against each other.. Same developing action except Microdol leaves a Pyro-like stain on the negative. They're both great. But if Perceptol is really discontinued, I guess I'll have very little choice but to pay more for Microdol. No big deal

    Check out my gallery, all my portraits are with Pan F+ and Perceptol.
    Money is not the problem. The problem is, I don't have any.

  5. #5
    Helen B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hell's Kitchen, New York, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,557
    Images
    27
    Maybe Perceptol will be undiscontinued...

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by djklmnop
    ...Microdol leaves a Pyro-like stain on the negative.
    Hrm. Having no experience with Pyro, I worry about this stain you mention. Do you figure it would cause problems when used with Multigrade paper?
    Jacob

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,055
    Mic.-X stain causes no problems when printing with VC papers.

  8. #8
    BarryWilkinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Somerset UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    691
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Helen B
    Maybe Perceptol will be undiscontinued...
    Maybe...

    In the meantime, Moersch Chemicals say their EFG Developer is identical to Perceptol. Same dev times/temps etc. I spoke to Retrophotographic in the UK who said they would get some in for me. Maybe if enough are interested, J&C in the USA would do the same?

    Barry



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin